Fuzzy-based HAZOP study for process industry

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 317, Issue , 2016, Pages 303-311

  Ahn, Junkeon ^a   Chang, Daejun ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Fuzzy HAZOP; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy risk matrix; Process industry; Risk analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; COMPUTER CIRCUITS; FUZZY SETS; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS; RECONFIGURABLE HARDWARE; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ANALYZING PROCESS; CENTER OF GRAVITY METHOD; FUZZY HAZOP; FUZZY RISK; MEMBERSHIP DEGREES; PROCESS INDUSTRIES; PROCESS PARAMETERS; TRAPEZOIDAL FUZZY NUMBERS;

FUZZY LOGIC;

LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS;

CRYOGENIC FLUID; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GRAVITY SURVEY; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ACCIDENT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; FUZZY LOGIC; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HAZARDOUS OPERABILITY; INDUSTRY; PROCESS DESIGN; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK REDUCTION;

EID: 84974721051     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.096     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Vinnem J.E. Offshore Risk Assessment: Principles, Modelling and Appilcations of QRA Studies 2007, Springer, Verlag, Berlin. second ed.
2. Chang K., Chang D. Offshore Plant Process and Safety Design 2013, Dong Myeong Publishers, Seoul.
3. DNV Marine risk assessment - offshore, health and safety executive, London. Technology Report 2001/063 2002.
4. IMO Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment for Use in the IMO Rule-Making Process 2002, International Maritime Organization, London.
5. Chang D. Risk-Based Design for Ships and Offshore Installations 2005, 113-126. Special Issue of the Society of Naval Architect of Korea.
6. Aven T., Vinnem J.E. Risk Management with Applications from the Offshore Petroleum Industry 2007, Springer Verlag, London.
7. USNRC Guidance of the Treatment of Uncertainties Associated with PRAs in Risk-Informed Decisionmaking, NUREG-1855 2013, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C.
8. Dubois D. Representation, propagation, and decision issues in risk analysis under incomplete probabilistic information. Risk Anal. 2010, 30:361-368. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01359.x.
9. Zio E., Aven T. Industrial disasters: extreme events, extremely rare Some reflections on the treatment of uncertainties in the assessment of the associated risks. Proc. Saf. Environ. Protect. 2013, 91:31-45. 10.1016/j.psep.2012.01.004.
10. Kiureghian A.D., Ditlevsen O. Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter?. Struct. Saf. 2009, 31:105-112. 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020.
11. Chang K., Kim S., Chang D., Ahn J., Zio E. Uncertainty analysis for target SIL determination in the offshore industry. J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind. 2015, 34:151-162. 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.01.030.
12. Komal D., Chang D., Lee S. Fuzzy reliability analysis of dual-fuel steam turbine propulsion system in LNG carriers considering data uncertainty. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 23:148-164. 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.01.030.
13. Knezevic J., Odoom E.R. Reliability modelling of repairable systems using Petri nets and fuzzy Lambda-Tau methodology. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2001, 73:1-17. 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00017-5.
14. Markowski A.S., Mannan M.S. Fuzzy risk matrix. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 159:152-157. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.055.
15. Markowski A.S., Mannan M.S. Fuzzy logic for piping risk assessment (pfLOPA). J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind. 2009, 22:921-927. 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.06.011.
16. Markowski A.S. exLOPA for explosion risks assessment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 142:669-676. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.070.
17. Markowski A.S., Kotynia A. Bow-tie model in layer of protection analysis. Proc. Saf. Environ. Protect. 2011, 89:205-213. 10.1016/j.psep.2011.04.005.
18. Khalil M., Abdou M.A., Mansour M.S., Farag H.A., Ossman M.E. A cascaded fuzzy-LOPA risk assessment model applied in natural gas industry. J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind. 2012, 25:877-882. 10.1016/j.jlp.2012.04.010.
19. Nait-Said R., Zidani F., Ouzraoui N. Modified risk graph method using fuzzy rule-based approach. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164:651-658. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.086.
20. Nait-Said R., Zidani F., Ouzraoui N. Fuzzy risk graph model for determining safety integrity Level. Int. J. Qual. Stat. Reliab. 2008, 263895. 10.1155/2008/263895.
21. Ouazraoui N., Bourareche M., Nait-Said R. Fuzzy modelling of uncertain data in the layers of protection analysis. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 2015, 1-6.
22. Abul-Haggag O.Y., Barakat W. Application of fuzzy logic for the determination of safety integrity in light of iec. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 2013, 3:41-48.
23. Sallak M., Simon C., Aubry J.-F. A fuzzy probabilistic approach for determining safety integrity Level. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2008, 16:239-248. 10.1109/TFUZZ.2007.903328.
24. Ahn J., Noh Y.Y., Lee Y., Chang D. Evaluation of SIL for cryogenic pump test facility, in: annuals Spring and Fall Conference. Kor. Soc. Mech. Eng. 2012, 1423-1428.
25. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Contr. 1965, 8:338-353. 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
26. Dubois D., Prade H. Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets 2000, Springer, Verlag Science Berlin.
27. Ross T.J. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications 2010, Wiley, New York. third ed.
28. Dubois D., Prade H. The mean value of a fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1987, 24:279-300. 10.1016/0165-0114(87)90028-5.
29. N.T.N.U SINTEF Offshore and Onshore Reliability Data, OREDA Handbook 2015, DNV, Oslo. sixth ed.
30. CCPS Guidelines for Initiating Events and Independent Protection Layers in Layer of Protection Analysis 2015, Wiley, New York.
31. Lassen C.A. Layer of Protection Analysis for Determination of Safety Integrity Level 2008, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
32. International Association of Oil and Gas Producers OGP Risk Assessment Data Directory 2010, International Association of Oil and Gas Producers, London, report 434-1.