Two-stage anaerobic digestion for reduced hydrogen sulphide production

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 1055-1062

  Moestedt, Jan ^a,b   Nordell, Erik ^a   Hallin, Sara ^a   Schnürer, Anna ^b  

^a Tekniska Verken   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Homoacetogenesis; OFMSW; Sulphate reduction; Thin stillage; Two stage

Indexed keywords

LOADING; METHANE; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

FULL-SCALE APPLICATIONS; HOMOACETOGENESIS; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; OFMSW; SPECIFIC METHANE PRODUCTION; SULPHATE REDUCTION; THIN STILLAGE; TWO-STAGE ANAEROBIC DIGESTIONS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

HYDROGEN SULFIDE; METHANE; SULFATE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; HYDROLYSIS; METHANOGENESIS; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; PH; REDUCTION;

EID: 84960796945     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4682     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Weiland P, Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:849-860 (2010).
2. Rabus R, Hansen TA and Widdel F, Dissimilatory sulfate- and sulfur-reducing prokaryotes, in The Prokaryotes. Springer, Singapore, pp. 659-768 (2006).
3. Moestedt J, Nilsson Påledal S and Schnürer A, The effect of substrate and operational parameters on the abundance of sulphate-reducing bacteria in industrial anaerobic biogas digesters. Bioresource Technol 132:327-332 (2013).
4. Jansen S, Gonzalez-Gil G and van Leeuwen HP, The impact of Co and Ni speciation on methanogenesis in sulfidic media - biouptake versus metal dissolution. Enzyme Microbial Technol 40:823-830 (2007).
5. Gustavsson J, Yekta SS, Karlsson A, Skyllberg U and Svensson BH, Potential bioavailability and chemical forms of Co and Ni in the biogas process - an evaluation based on sequential and acid volatile sulfide extractions. Eng Life Sci 13:572-579 (2013).
6. van der Veen A, Fermoso FG and Lens PNL, Bonding form of metals and sulfur fractionation in methanol-grown anaerobic granular sludge. Eng Life Sci 7:480-489 (2007).
7. Angelidaki I, Karakashev D, Batstone DJ, Plugge CM and Stams AJM, Biomethanation and its potential, in Methods in Enzymology: Methods in Methane Metabolism, ed. by Rosenzweig AC and Ragsdale SW. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 327-351 (2011).
8. Thauer RK, Jungermann K and Decker K, Energy-conservation in chemotropic anaerobic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 41:100-180 (1977).
9. Kristjansson JK, Schönheit P and Thauer RK, Different Ks values for hydrogen of methanogenic bacteria and sulfate reducing bacteria: an explanation for the apperent inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate. Arch Microbiol 131:278-282 (1982).
10. Stams AJM, Oude Elferink SJWH and Westermann P, Metabolic interactions between methanogenic consortia and anaerobic respiring bacteria. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 81:31-56 (2003).
11. Plugge CM, Zhang W, Scholten JCM and Stams AJM, Metabolic flexibility of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Front Microbiol 2(81):1-8 (2011).
12. Moestedt J, Nordell E and Schnurer A, Comparison of operating strategies for increased biogas production from thin stillage. J Biotechnol 175:22-30 (2014).
13. Jing ZQ, Hu Y, Niu QG, Liu YY, Li YY and Wang XCC, UASB performance and electron competition between methane-producing archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria in treating sulfate-rich wastewater containing ethanol and acetate. Bioresource Technol 137:349-357 (2013).
14. Dar SA, Kleerebezem R, Stams AJM, Kuenen JG and Muyzer G, Competition and coexistence of sulfate-reducing bacteria, acetogens and methanogens in a lab-scale anaerobic bioreactor as affected by changing substrate to sulfate ratio. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 78(6):1045-1055 (2008).
15. McCartney DM and Oleszkiewicz JA, Competition between methanogens and sulfate reducers: effect of COD:sulfate ratio and acclimation. Water Environ Res 65:655-664 (1993).
16. O'Reilly C and Colleran E, Effect of influent COD/SO42-ratios on mesophilic anaerobic reactor biomass populations: physio-chemical and microbiological properties. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 56(1):141-153 (2006).
17. Hwang JH, Choi JA, Abou-Shanab RAI, Bhatnagar A, Min B, Song H et al., Effect of pH and sulfate concentration on hydrogen production using anaerobic mixed microflora. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:9702-9710 (2009).
18. Mizuno O, Li YY and Noike T, The behavior of sulfate-reducing bacteria in acidogenic phase of anaerobic digestion. Water Res 32:1626-1634 (1998).
19. Lin CY and Chen HP, Sulfate effect on fermentative hydrogen production using anaerobic mixed microflora. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31:953-960 (2006).
20. Yilmaz V and Demirer GN, Enhancing the performance of anaerobic digestion of dairy manure through phase-separation. Clean - Soil Air Water 36:760-766 (2008).
21. Li J, Wang J, Luan ZK, Ji ZG and Yu L, Biological sulfate removal from acrylic fiber manufacturing wastewater using a two-stage UASB reactor. J Environ Sci 24:343-350 (2012).
22. Kongjan P, O-Thong S and Angelidaki I, Hydrogen and methane production from desugared molasses using a two-stage thermophilic anaerobic process. Eng Life Sci 13:118-125 (2013).
23. Moestedt J, Nilsson Påledal S, Schnürer A and Nordell E, Biogas production from thin stillage on an industrial scale - experience and optimization. Energies 6:5642-5655 (2013).
24. Dareioti MA and Kornaros M, Effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT) on the anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes in a two-stage CSTR system. Bioresource Technol 167:407-415 (2014).
25. Liu DW, Liu DP, Zeng RJ and Angelidaki I, Hydrogen and methane production from household solid waste in the two-stage fermentation process. Water Res 40:2230-2236 (2006).
26. Chu CF, Li YY, Xu KQ, Ebie Y, Inamori Y and Kong HN, A pH- and temperature-phased two-stage process for hydrogen and methane production from food waste. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:4739-4746 (2008).
27. Zhang B and He PJ, Performance assessment of two-stage anaerobic digestion of kitchen wastes. Environ Technol 35:1277-1285 (2014).
28. Luo G, Xie L, Zhou Q and Angelidaki I, Enhancement of bioenergy production from organic wastes by two-stage anaerobic hydrogen and methane production process. Bioresource Technol 102:8700-8706 (2011).
29. Kapdan IK and Kargi F, Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials. Enzyme Microbial Technol 38:569-582 (2006).
30. Hwang MH, Jang NJ, Hyun SH and Kim IS, Anaerobic bio-hydrogen production from ethanol fermentation: the role of pH. J Biotechnol 111:297-309 (2004).
31. Saady NMC, Homoacetogenesis during hydrogen production by mixed cultures dark fermentation: unresolved challenge. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:13172-13191 (2013).
32. Sánchez-Andrea I, Sanz JL, Bijmans MFM and Stams AJM, Sulfate reduction at low pH to remediate mine drainage. J Hazard Mater 269:98-109 (2014).
33. Gustavsson J, Svensson BH and Karlsson A, The feasibility of trace element supplementation for stable operation of wheat stillage-fed biogas tank reactors. Water Sci Technol 64:320-325 (2011).
34. Schonberg M and Linke B, The influence of the temperature regime on the formation of methane in a two-phase anaerobic digestion process. Eng Life Sci 12:279-286 (2012).
35. Lin YQ, Wu SB and Wang DH, Hydrogen-methane production from pulp and paper sludge and food waste by mesophilic-thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:15055-15062 (2013).
36. Wilkie AC, Riedesel KJ and Owens JM, Stillage characterization and anaerobic treatment of ethanol stillage from conventional and cellulosic feedstock. Biomass Bioenergy 19:63-102 (2000).