Grand Views of Evolution

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 324-334

  de Vladar, Harold P ^a,b   Santos, Mauro ^c   Szathmáry, Eörs ^a,b,d,e  

^a PARMENIDES FOUNDATION   (Germany)

^b Institute for Advanced Studies Koszeg IASK   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^d EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^e MTA CENTRE FOR ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FITNESS; HERITABILITY; NICHE; PHENOTYPE;

ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; PHENOTYPE;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOLOGY; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 85013811814     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.01.008     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. 1 Darwin, C., The Origin of Species. 1859, John Murray.
2. 2 Nordbotten, J.M., Stenseth, N.C., Asymmetric ecological conditions favor Red-Queen type of continued evolution over stasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113 (2016), 1847–1852.
3. 3 Day, T., Computability, Gödel's incompleteness theorem, and an inherent limit on the predictability of evolution. J. Roy. Soc. Interface 9 (2011), 624–639.
4. 4 Maynard Smith, J., The Problems of Biology. 1986, Oxford University Press.
5. 5 Van Valen, L., A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theory 1 (1973), 1–30.
6. 6 Stenseth, N.C., Maynard Smith, J., Coevolution in ecosystems: Red Queen evolution or stasis?. Evolution 38 (1984), 870–880.
7. 7 Finnegan, S., et al. The Red Queen revisited: reevaluating the age selectivity of Phanerozoic marine genus extinctions. Paleobiology 34 (2008), 318–341.
8. 8 Benton, M.J., The Red Queen and the Court Jester: species diversity and the role of biotic and abiotic factors through time. Science 323 (2009), 728–732.
9. 9 Voje, K.L., Tempo does not correlate with mode in the fossil record. Evolution 70 (2016), 2678–2689.
10. 10 Hodgson, E.E., Otto, S.P., The Red Queen coupled with directional selection favours the evolution of sex. J. Evol. Biol. 25 (2012), 797–802.
11. 11 Wright, S., Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16 (1931), 97–159.
12. 12 Simpson, G.G., Tempo and Mode in Evolution. 1944, Columbia University Press.
13. 13 Arnold, S., et al. The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro and macroevolution. Genetica 112–113 (2001), 9–32.
14. 14 Calsbeek, R., et al. Fluctuating selection and dynamics adaptive landscapes. Svensson, E.I., Calsbeek, R., (eds.) The Adaptive Landscape in Evolutionary Biology, 2012, Oxford University Press, 89–109.
15. 15 Lande, R., Expected relative fitness and the adaptive topography of fluctuating selection. Evolution 61 (2007), 1835–1846.
16. 16 Chevin, L.M., Genetic constraints on adaptation to a changing environment. Evolution 67 (2013), 708–721.
17. 17 Grant, P.R., Grant, B.R., 40 Years of Evolution: Darwin's Finches on Daphne Major Island. 2014, Princeton University Press.
18. 18 Lande, R., The dynamics of peak shifts and the pattern of morphological evolution. Paleobiology 12 (1986), 343–354.
19. 19 Barricelli, N.A., Symbiogenetic evolution processes realized by artificial methods. Methodos 9 (1957), 35–36.
20. 20 Barricelli, N.A., Numerical testing of evolution theories. Part I. Theoretical introduction and basic tests. Acta Biotheor. 16 (1962), 69–98.
21. 21 Barricelli, N.A., Numerical testing of evolution theories. Part II. Preliminary tests of performance. Symbiogenesis and terrestrial life. Acta Biotheor. 16 (1963), 99–126.
22. 22 Ray, T.S., An approach to the synthesis of life. Langton, C.G., et al. (eds.) Artificial Life II, 1991, Addison-Wesley, 371–408.
23. 23 Ray, T.S., Evolving complexity. ALife Robot 1 (1997), 21–26.
24. 24 Adami, C., Brown, C.T., Evolutionary learning in the 2D artificial life system ‘Avida’. Brooks, R., Maes, P., (eds.) Artificial Life IV, 1994, The MIT Press, 377–381.
25. 25 Wilke, C.O., Adami, C., The biology of digital organisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 (2004), 528–532.
26. 26 Banzhaf, W., et al. Defining and simulating open-ended novelty: requirements, guidelines, and challenges. Theory Biosci. 135 (2016), 131–161.
27. 27 Soros, L.B., Stanley, K.O., Identifying necessary conditions for open-ended evolution through the artificial life world of Chromaria. Sayama, H., et al. (eds.) Artificial Life 14, 2014, MIT Press, 793–800.
28. 28 Chow, S.S., et al. Adaptive radiation from resource competition in digital organisms. Science 305 (2004), 84–86.
29. 29 Solé, R.V., Valverde, S., Before the endless forms: embodied model of transition from single cells to aggregates to ecosystem engineering. PLoS ONE, 8, 2013, e59664.
30. 30 Pargellis, A.N., The spontaneous generation of digital life. Physica D 91 (1996), 86–96.
31. 31 Gánti, T., The Principles of Life. 2003, Oxford University Press.
32. 32 Kauffman, S.A., Investigations. 2010, Oxford University Press.
33. 33 Kauffman, S.A., Humanity in a Creative Universe. 2016, Oxford University Press.
34. 34 Tria, F., et al. The dynamics of correlated novelties. Sci. Rep., 4, 2014, 5890.
35. 35 Kampis, G., Self-modifying systems: a model for the constructive origin of information. BioSystems 38 (1996), 119–125.
36. 36 Maynard Smith, J., Szathmáry, E., The Major Transitions in Evolution. 1995, Freeman.
37. 37 Conway Morris, S., Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe. 2004, Cambridge University Press.
38. 38 Waddington, C.H., Paradigm for an evolutionary process. Waddington, C.H., (eds.) Towards a Theoretical Biology, Vol. 2, 1969, Edinburgh University Press, 106–123.
39. 39 Wagner, G., Evolutionary innovations and novelties: let us get down to business!. Zool. Anzeiger. 256 (2015), 75–81.
40. 40 Millikan, R.G., In defense of proper functions. Philos. Sci. 56 (1989), 288–302.
41. 41 Neander, K., Functions as selected effects: the conceptual analyst's defense. Philos. Sci. 58 (1991), 168–184.
42. 42 Cummins, R., Functional analysis. J. Philos. 72 (1975), 741–765.
43. 43 Koonin, E.V., The Logic of Chance: The Nature and Origin of Biological Evolution. 2012, FT Press Science.
44. 44 Gavrilets, S., Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. 2004, Princeton University Press.
45. 45 Wagner, A., The Origins of Evolutionary Innovations: A Theory of Transformative Change in Living Systems. 2011, Oxford University Press.
46. 46 Wagner, A., Gene duplications, robustness and evolutionary innovations. Bioessays 30 (2008), 367–373.
47. 47 Kauffman, S.A., Foreword: Statable and non-prestatable fitness landscapes. Richter, H., Engelbrecht, A.P., (eds.) Recent Advances in the Theory and Application of Fitness Landscapes, 2014, Springer-Verlag, vii–xiv.
48. 48 Fernando, C., et al. Evolvability of natural and artificial systems. Procedia Comp. Sci. 7 (2011), 73–76.
49. 49 Jablonski, D., Evolutionary innovations in the fossil record: the intersection of ecology, development, and macroevolution. J. Exp. Zool. 304B (2005), 504–519.
50. 50 Benner, S.A., et al. Is there a common chemical model for life in the universe?. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8 (2004), 672–689.
51. 51 Blount, Z.D., et al. Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008), 7899–7906.
52. 52 Blount, Z.D., et al. Genomic analysis of a key innovation in an experimental Escherichia coli population. Nature 489 (2012), 513–518.
53. 53 Roth, J.R., Maisnier-Patin, S., Reinterpreting long-term evolution experiments: Is delayed adaptation an example of historical contingency or a consequence of intermittent selection?. J. Bacteriol. 198 (2016), 1009–1012.
54. 54 de Vladar, H.P., Barton, N.H., The contribution of statistical physics to evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26 (2011), 424–432.
55. 55 Wistow, G.J., Piatigorsky, J., Lens crystallins: the evolution and expression of proteins for a highly specialized tissue. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57 (1988), 479–504.
56. 56 Bickerton, R., More Than Nature Needs. Language, Mind and Evolution. 2014, Harvard University Press.
57. 57 Galef, B.G. Jr, Social learning and imitation. Heyes, C.M., Galef, B.G. Jr, (eds.) Social Learning in Animals. The Roots of Culture, 1996, Academic Press, 3–15.
58. 58 Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 56 (2007), 384–398.
59. 59 Longo, G., et al. No entailing laws, but enablement in the evolution of the biosphere. arXiv, 2012 1201.2069v1.
60. 60 Szathmáry, E., Toward major evolutionary transitions theory 2.0. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 (2015), 10104–10111.
61. 61 Ruiz-Mirazo, K., et al. Enabling conditions for ‘open-ended evolution’. Biol. Philos. 23 (2008), 67–85.
62. 62 Standish, R.K., Open-ended artificial evolution. Int. J. Comp. Intel Appl., 3, 2003, 167.
63. 63 McLeish, T.C.B., Are there ergodic limits to evolution? Ergodic exploration of genome space and convergence. Interface Focus, 5, 2015, 20150041.
64. 64 Wilf, H.S., Ewens, W.J., There's plenty of time for evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107 (2010), 22454–22456.
65. 65 Cover, A.W. III, et al. Experiments on the role of deleterious mutations as stepping stones in adaptive evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. A 110 (2013), E3171–E3178.
66. 66 Natarajan, C., et al. Predictable convergence in hemoglobin function has unpredictable molecular underpinnings. Science 354 (2016), 336–339.
67. 67 Dawkins, R., Climbing Mount Improbable. 1996, W.W. Norton & Co.
68. 68 Burrows, M., Sutton, G., Interactive gears synchronize propulsive leg movements in a jumping insect. Science 341 (2013), 1254–1256.
69. 69 Penrose, R., The Emperor's New Mind. 1989, Oxford University Press.
70. 70 Wright, S., The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proc. VI Int. Cong. Genet. 1 (1932), 356–366.
71. 71 Demazure, M., Bifurcations and Catastrophes: Geometry Solutions to Nonlinear Problems. 2013, Springer.
72. 72 Dodson, M.M., Darwin's law of natural selection and Thom's theory of catastrophes. Math. Biosci. 28 (1976), 243–274.
73. 73 Weaver, D.S., Catastrophe theory and human evolution. J. Anthrop. Res. 36 (1980), 403–410.
74. 74 Ruelle, D., A mechanism for speciation based on the theory of phase transitions. Math. Biosci. 56 (1981), 71–75.
75. 75 Lande, R., Expected relative fitness and the adaptive topography of fluctuating selection. Evolution 61 (2007), 1835–1846.
76. 76 Matuszwski, S., Hermisson, J., Kopp, M., Catch me if you can: adaptation from standing genetic variation to a moving optimum. Genetics 200 (2015), 1255–1274.
77. 77 Bürger, R., The Mathematical Theory of Selection, Recombination, and Mutation. 2000, Wiley.
78. 78 Bod'ová, K., et al. A general approximation for the dynamics of quantitative traits. Genetics 202 (2016), 1523–1548.
79. 79 Sæther, B.E., Engen, S., The concept of fitness in fluctuating environments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30 (2015), 273–281.
80. 80 Trujillo, L., et al. Random maps in physical systems. Europhys. Lett. 66 (2007), 638–644.
81. 81 Trujillo, L., et al. Autonomous choices among deterministic evolution-laws as source of uncertainty. arXiv, 2016 1611.01656.
82. 82 Taylor, T., Creativity in evolution: individuals, interactions and environments in P.J. Bentley and D.W. Corne (eds.) Creative Evolutionary Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, 2001.