Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications

Accountability in Research

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 243-267

  Smith, Elise ^a,b   Master, Zubin ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^c ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Authorship; ethics and public policy; multidisciplinary research teams; publication; publication ethics; research integrity; responsible conduct of research

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; PERSONNEL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; PUBLICATIONS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 85013465838     PISSN: 08989621     EISSN: 15455815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1287567     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Ahmed, S. M., C. A., Maurana, J. A., Engle, D. E., Uddin, and K. D., Glaus. 1997. A Method for Assigning Authorship in Multiauthored Publications. Family Medicine 29 (1):42–44.
2. Akhabue, E., and E., Lautenbach. 2010. ‘Equal’ Contributions and Credit:An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship. Annals of Epidemiology 20 (11):868–71. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.08.004.
3. Allen, L., A., Brand, J., Scott, M., Altman, and M., Hlava. 2014. Credit Where Credit Is Due. Nature 508:312–13. doi:10.1038/508312a.
4. Australian Research Council. 2014. State of Australian University Research. Text Volume 1. http://www.arc.gov.au/era-reports#ERA2015.
5. Bates, T., A., Anić, M., Marušić, and A., Marušić. 2004. Authorship Criteria and Disclosure of Contributions. JAMA:the Journal of the American Medical Association 292 (1):86–88. doi:10.1001/jama.292.1.86.
6. Belwalkar, B., and S., Toaddy. 2014. Authorship Determination Scorecard. http://www.apa.org/science/leadership/students/authorship-determination-scorecard.pdf.
7. Bennett, D. M., and D. M. D., Taylor. 2003. Unethical Practices in Authorship of Scientific Papers. Emergency Medicine 15:263–70. doi:10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00432.x.
8. Bhandari, M., G. H., Guyatt, A. V., Kulkarni, P. J., Devereaux, P., Leece, S., Bajammal, D., Heels-Ansdell, and J. W., Busse. 2014. Perceptions of Authors’ Contributions Are Influenced by Both Byline Order and Designation of Corresponding Author. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 67 (9):1049–54. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.006.
9. Bhopal, R. S., J. M., Rankin, E., McColl, R., Stacy, P. H., Pearson, E. F., Kaner, L. H., Thomas, B. G., Vernon, and H., Rodgers. 1997. Authorship. Team Approach to Assigning Authorship Order Is Recommended. BMJ:British Medical Journal 314 (7086):1046.
10. Chan, K. C., C. R., Chen, and L. T. W., Cheng. 2009. Co-Authorship Patterns in Accounting Research. International Review of Accounting, Banking and Finance 1 (2):1–10.
11. Chawla, D. S., 2014. Could Digital Badges Clarify the Roles of Co-Authors? http://news.sciencemag.org/scientific-community/2014/11/could-digital-badges-clarify-roles-co-authors (accessed December 12, 2015).
12. Chawla, D. S., 2015. Digital Badges Aim to Clear up Politics of Authorship. Nature 526 (7571):145–46. doi:10.1038/526145a.
13. COPE. 2011. Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors; Version 4. http://publicationethics.org/guidelines.
14. Dance, A., 2012. Authorship:Who’s on First? Nature 489 (7417):591–93. doi:10.1038/nj7417-591a.
15. De Vries, R., M. S., Anderson, and B. C., Martinson. 2006. Normal Misbehavior:Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics:An International Journal 1:43–50. doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.43.
16. Desrochers, N., T. D., Bowman, S., Haustein, P., Mongeon, A., Quan-Haase, A., Paul-Hus, R., Costas, V., Larivière, J., Pecoskie, and A., Tsou. 2015. Authorship, Patents, Citations, Acknowledgments, Tweets, Reader Counts and the Multifaceted Reward System of Science. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 52 (1):1–4. doi:10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010013.
17. Devine, E. B., J., Beney, and L. A., Bero. 2005. Equity, Accountability, Transparency:Implementation of the Contributorship Concept in a Multi-Site Study. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 69 (4):455–59. doi:10.5688/aj690461.
18. Dotson, B., 2013. Equal Contributions and Credit Assigned to Authors in Pharmacy Journals. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 77:2. doi:10.5688/ajpe77239.
19. DuBois, J. M., D. A., Schilling, E., Heitman, N. H., Steneck, and A. A., Kon. 2010. Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research:An Inventory of Programs and Materials within CTSAs. Clinical and Translational Science 3 (3):109–11. doi:10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00193.x.
20. Dyck, M. J., 2012. Misused Honorary Authorship Is No Excuse for Quantifying the Unquantifiable. Journal of Medical Ethics medethics–2012–100939, September. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100939.
21. Endersby, J. W., 1996. Collaborative Research in the Social Sciences:Multiple Authorship and Publication Credit. Social Science Quarterly 77 (2):375–92.
22. Flanagin, A., L. A., Carey, P. B., Fontanarosa, et al. 1998. Prevalence of Articles with Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals. JAMA 280 (3):222–24. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.222.
23. Frandsen, T. F., and J., Nicolaisen. 2010. What Is in a Name? Credit Assignment Practices in Different Disciplines. Journal of Informetrics 4:608–17. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.010.
24. Frische, S., 2012. It Is Time for Full Disclosure of Author Contributions. Nature 489 (7417):475–475. doi:10.1038/489475a.
25. Gaeta, T. J., 1999. Authorship:“Law” and Order. Academic Emergency Medicine 6 (4):297–301. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00393.x.
26. Gingras, Y., 2014. Les dérives de l’évaluation de la recherche:Du bon usage de la bibliométrie. Paris, France:Raisons d’agir éditions.
27. Gutmann, A., and D. F., Thompson. 2014. The spirit of compromise:Why governing demands it and campaigning undermines it. Princeton:Princeton University Press.
28. Holleman, W., and E. R., Gritz. 2013. Biomedical Burnout. Nature 500 (7464):613–14. doi:10.1038/nj7464-613a.
29. Holleman, W. L., L. M., Cofta-Woerpel, and E. R., Gritz. 2015. Stress and Morale of Academic Biomedical Scientists. Academic Medicine 90 (5):562–64. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000533.
30. Hundley, V., E., Teijlingen, and P., Simkhada. 2013. Academic Authorship:Who, Why and in What Order? Health Renaissance 11 (2):99–101. doi:10.3126/hren.v11i2.8214.
31. Hunt, R., 1991. Trying an Authorship Index. Nature 352 (6332):187–187. doi:10.1038/352187a0.
32. Hwang, S., H. H., Song, J. H., Baik, S. L., Jung, S. H., Park, K. H., Choi, and Y. H., Park. 2003. Researcher Contributions and Fulfillment of ICMJE Authorship Criteria:Analysis of Author Contribution Lists in Research Articles with Multiple Authors Published in Radiology1. Radiology 226 (1):16–23. doi:10.1148/radiol.2261011255.
33. ICMJE. 2015. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. http://icmje.acponline.org/news-and-editorials/icmje-recommendations_annotated_dec14.pdf.
34. Kalichman, M. W., 2011. Overview:Underserved Areas of Education in the Responsible Conduct of Research:Authorship. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):335–39. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9281-3.
35. Kalichman, M. W., 2014. Rescuing Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Education. Accountability in Research 21 (1):68–83. doi:10.1080/08989621.2013.822271.
36. Kalichman, M. W., and D. K., Plemmons. 2007. Reported Goals for Responsible Conduct of Research Courses. Academic Medicine 82 (9):846–52. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f78bf.
37. Katz, D. S., and A., Smith. 2014. Implementing Transitive Credit with JSON-LD. \Iarxiv Preprint Arxiv 1407:5117. http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5117.
38. Kosslyn, S., 2002. Criteria for Authorship Order. http://kosslynlab.fas.harvard.edu/files/kosslynlab/files/authorship_criteria_nov02.pdf.
39. Kovacs, J., 2013. Honorary Authorship Epidemic in Scholarly Publications? How the Current Use of Citation-Based Evaluative Metrics Make (pseudo)honorary Authors from Honest Contributors of Every Multi-Author Article. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):509–12. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100568.
40. Kwok, L. S., 2005. The White Bull Effect:Abusive Coauthorship and Publication Parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (9):554–56. doi:10.1136/jme.2004.010553.
41. Lacasse, J. R., and J., Leo. 2010. Ghostwriting at Elite Academic Medical Centers in the United States. Plos Medicine 7 (2):e1000230. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000230.
42. Laflin, M. T., E. D., Glover, and R. J., McDermott. 2005. Publication Ethics:An Examination of Authorship Practices. American Journal of Health Behavior 29:579–87. doi:10.5993/AJHB.29.6.12.
43. LaFollette, M. C., 1992. Stealing into print:Fraud, plagiarism, and misconduct in scientific publishing. Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
44. Larivière, V., N., Desrochers, B., Macaluso, P., Mongeon, A., Paul-Hus, and C., Sugimoto. 2016. Contributorship and Division of Labor in Knowledge Production. Accepted for Publicaiton in Social Studies of Science. doi:10.1177/0306312716650046.
45. Louis, K. S., J. M., Holdsworth, M. S., Anderson, and E. G., Campbell. 2008. Everyday Ethics in Research:Translating Authorship Guidelines into Practice in the Bench Sciences. The Journal of Higher Education 79:88–112. doi:10.1353/jhe.2008.0002.
46. Martinson, B. C., M. S., Anderson, and R., De Vries. 2005. Scientists Behaving Badly. Nature 435:737–38. doi:10.1038/435737a.
47. Marušić, A., L., Bošnjak, and A., Jerončić. 2011. A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines. Plos ONE 6 (9):e23477. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023477.
48. Marušič, A., D., Hren, B., Mansi, N., Lineberry, A., Bhattacharya, M., Garrity, J., Clark, et al. 2014. Five-Step Authorship Framework to Improve Transparency in Disclosing Contributors to Industry-Sponsored Clinical Trial Publications. BMC Medicine 12 (1):197. doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0197-z.
49. Master, Z., 2011. The responsible conduct of bioethics research. Accountability in Research 18:102–19. doi:10.1080/08989621.2011.557302.
50. Master, Z., and G. K. D., Crozier. 2012. The ethics of moral compromise for stem cell research policy. Health Care Analysis 20 (1):50–65. doi:10.1007/s10728-011-0171-2.
51. Master, Z., M., McDonald, D., Paciulli, and H., Longstaff. 2016. A Primer on Ethics Education for Stem Cell and Biomedical Scientists. Current Stem Cell Reports 2:1–13.
52. Mastroianni, A. C., and J. P., Kahn. 1999. Encouraging accountability in research:A Pilot assessment of training efforts. Accountability in Research 7 (1):85–100. doi:10.1080/08989629908573943.
53. Moher, D., and D. G., Altman. 2015. Four proposals to help improve the medical research literature. Plos Medicine 12 (9):e1001864. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001864.
54. National Academies (U.S.), Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.), National Academy of Sciences (U.S.), National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine (U.S.), eds. 2005. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, D.C.:The National Academies Press.
55. National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2009. Update on the Requirement for Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research. NOT-OD-10-019. http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.html (accessed November 24).
56. National Science Foundation (NSF). 2009. Responsible Conduct of Research, vol. 74, no. 160. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-08-20/html/E9-19930.htm.
57. Nylenna, M., F., Fagerbakk, and P., Kierulf. 2014. Authorship:Attitudes and Practice among Norwegian Researchers. BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):53. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-53.
58. Office of Research Integrity. 2000. Public Health Service Policy on Instruction in the responsible conduct of research. http://oprs.usc.edu/files/2013/01/PHS_Policy_on_RCR1.pdf (accessed October 31, 2016).
59. Okonta, P., and T., Rossouw. 2013. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria. Developing World Bioethics 13 (3):149–57. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x.
60. Osborne, J. W., and A., Holland. 2009. What Is Authorship, and What Should It Be? A Survey of Prominent Guidelines for Determining Authorship in Scientific Publications. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 14 (15):2.
61. Paneth, N., 1998. Separating authorship responsibility and authorship credit:A proposal for biomedical journals. American Journal of Public Health 88 (5):824–26. doi:10.2105/AJPH.88.5.824.
62. Pontille, D., 2004. La Signature Scientifique:Une Sociologie Pragmatique de L’attribution. CNRS Sociologie (Paris). http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=16213499.
63. Porter, A. L., D. J., Roessner, and A. E., Heberger. 2008. How Interdisciplinary Is a given Body of Research? Research Evaluation 17 (4):273–82. doi:10.3152/095820208X364553.
64. Prabhakar, C. T., 2014. Authorship Matrix:A rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific articles. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9454-3.
65. Rennie, D., 2001. Who Did What? Authorship and Contribution in 2001. Muscle & Nerve 24 (10):1274–77. doi:10.1002/mus.1144.
66. Rennie, D., V., Yank, and L., Emanuel. 1997. When authorship fails. A Proposal to make contributors accountable. The Journal of the American Medical Association 278 (7):579–85. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041.
67. Resnik, D., 1997. A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):237–43. doi:10.1007/s11948-997-0023-5.
68. Resnik, D., 1998. The ethics of science:An introduction. London, UK:Routledge.
69. Resnik, D., and Z., Master. 2011. Criteria for authorship in bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 11:17–21. doi:10.1080/15265161.2011.603795.
70. Resnik, D., and Z., Master. 2013. Policies and initiatives aimed at addressing research misconduct in high-income countries. Plos Medicine 10 (3):e1001406. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001406.
71. Sandler, J. C., and B. L., Russell. 2005. Faculty-student collaborations:Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit. Ethics and Behavior 15 (1):65–80. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1501_5.
72. Scheetz, M. D., 1999. Office of research integrity:A reflection of disputes and misunderstandings. Croatian Medical Journal 40:321–25.
73. Schmidt, R. H., 1987. A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 68 (1):8–10.
74. Sheskin, T. J., 2006. An analytic hierarchy process model to apportion co-author responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics 12:555–65. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0053-4.
75. Smith, E., Forthcoming. A theoretical foundation for the ethical distribution of authorship in multidisciplinary publications. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal.
76. Smith, E., and R., Boulanger. 2011. What about author order and acknowledgments? suggestions for additional criteria for conceptual research in bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 11:24–26. doi:10.1080/15265161.2011.603813.
77. Smith, E., and B., Williams-Jones. 2011. Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research:a review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):1–14.
78. Smith, R., 1997. Authorship Is Dying:Long Live Contributorship. Bmj 315 (7110):696. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7110.696.
79. Steneck, N. H., and R. E., Bulger. 2007. The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine 82 (9):829–34. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d.
80. Sulmasy, D. P., and J., Sugarman. 2010. The Many Methods of Medical Ethics (Or, Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Black Bird). In Methods in medical ethics, 2nd ed., 3–20. Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press.
81. Teixeira Da Silva, J. A., and J., Dobránszki. 2015. Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts:Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, October. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3.
82. Tijdink, J. K., R., Verbeke, and Y. M., Smulders. 2014. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 9 (5):64–71.
83. Tijdink, J. K., A. C. M., Vergouwen, and Y. M., Smulders. 2013. Publication pressure and burn out among dutch medical professors:A nationwide survey. Plos One 8 (9):e73381. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073381.
84. Tri-Agency. 2011. Tri-Agency Framework:Responsible conduct of research. http://www.rcr.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/framework-cadre/ (accessed October 31, 2016).
85. Tscharntke, T., M. E., Hochberg, T. A., Rand, V. H., Resh, and J., Krauss. 2007. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. Plos Biology 5 (1):e18.
86. Van Praag, C. M., and B. M. S., Van Praag. 2008. The benefits of being economics professor A (Rather than Z). Economica 75:782–96. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00653.x.
87. Waltman, L., 2012. An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. Journal of Informetrics 6 (4):700–11. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.008.
88. WAME. 2007. Policy Statements—World Association of Medical Editors. http://www.wame.org/policy-statements (accessed October 31, 2016).
89. Wang, F., L., Tang, L., Bo, J., Li, and X., Deng. 2012. Equal contributions and credit given to authors in critical care medicine journals during a 10-Yr Period*:. Critical Care Medicine 40 (3):967–69. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236f66a.
90. Warrender, J. M., 2016. A simple framework for evaluating authorial contributions for scientific publications. Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1419–1430.
91. Wilcox, L. J., 1998. Authorship:The coin of the realm, the source of complaints. JAMA 280 (3):216–17. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.216.
92. Winston, R. B., 1985. A suggested procedure for determining order of authorship in research publications. Journal of Counseling and Development 63 (8):515–18. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1985.tb02749.x.
93. Wuchty, S., B. F., Jones, and B., Uzzi. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316 (5827):1036–39. doi:10.1126/science.1136099.