What about author order and acknowledgments? Suggestions for additional criteria for conceptual research in bioethics

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 24-26

  Smith, Elise ^a   Boulanger, Renaud ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; HUMAN; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; BIOETHICS; HUMANS;

EID: 80053241549     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2011.603813     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Antes, A. L., and M. D. Mumford. 2010. Making sense of academic misconduct. In Crime and corruption in organizations: Why it occurs and what to do about it, ed. R. J. Burke, C. L. Cooper, and E. C. Tomlinson, 215-248. United Kingdom: Gower.
2. Chambers, R., E. Boath, and S. Chambers. 2001. The A to Z of authorship: Analysis of influence of initial letter of surname on order of authorship. British Medical Journal 323(7327): 1460.
3. Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, and R. De Vries. 2005. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435(7043): 737-738.
4. Master, Z. 2011. The responsible conduct of bioethics research. Accountability in Research 18(2): 102-119.
5. Rennie, D., and A. Flanagin. 1994. Authorship! Authorship! Journal of the American Medical Association 271(6): 469.
6. Resnik, D. B., and Z. Master. 2011. Criteria for authorship in bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 11(10): 17-21.
7. Smith, E., and B. Williams-Jones. 2011. Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: A review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Science and Engineering Ethics 1-14. E-pub ahead of print.
8. Van Praag, C. M., and B. M. S. Van Praag. 2008. The benefits of being economics professor A (rather than Z). Economica 75(300): 782-796.
9. Wager, E. 2009. Recognition, reward and responsibility: Why the authorship of scientific papers matters. Maturitas 62(2): 109-112.