Faculty-student collaborations: Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit

Ethics and Behavior

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 65-80

  Sandler, Jeffrey C ^a   Russell, Brenda L ^a  

^a Castleton State College   (United States)

Author keywords

Authorship credit; Ethics; Faculty student relationships

Indexed keywords

EID: 20744446597     PISSN: 10508422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327019eb1501_5     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
2. American Psychological Association. (1998). Report of the ethics committee. American Psychologist, 53, 969-980.
3. American Psychological Association. (1999). Report of the ethics committee. American Psychologist, 54, 701-710.
4. American Psychological Association. (2000). Report of the ethics committee. American Psychologist, 55, 938-945.
5. American Psychological Association. (2001). Report of the ethics committee. American Psychologist, 56. 680-688.
6. American Psychological Association. (2002a). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073.
7. American Psychological Association. (2002b). Report of the ethics committee. American Psychologist, 57, 646-653.
8. Bartle, S. A., Fink A. A., & Hayes, B. C. (2000). Psychology of the scientist: LXXX. Attitudes regarding authorship issues in psychological publications. Psychological Reports, 86, 771-788.
9. Bridgewater, C. A., Bornstein, P. H., & Walkenbach, J. (1981). Ethical issues in the assignment of publication credit. American Psychologist, 36, 524-525.
10. Costa, M. M., & Gatz, M. (1992). Determination of authorship credit in published dissertations. Psychological Science, 3, 354-357.
11. Fine, M. A., & Kurdek, L. A. (1993). Reflections of determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations. American Psychologist, 48, 1141-1147.
12. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93-104.
13. Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs' Advisory Group on the conduct of research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59, 105-117.
14. Louw, D. A., & Fouche, J. B. (1999). Authorship credit in supervisor-student collaboration: Assessing the dilemma in psychology. South African Journal of Psychology, 29, 145-153.
15. Neisser, U., & Harsch, N. (1992). Phantom flashbulbs: False recollections of hearing the news about Challenger. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of "flashbulb memories." New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Pittenger, D. J. (2003). Internet research: An opportunity to revisit classic ethical problems in behavioral research. Ethics & Behavior, 13, 45-60.
17. Rose, R. R., & Fischer, K. (1998). Do authorship policies impact students'judgments of perceived wrongdoing? Ethics & Behavior, 8, 59-79.
18. Rupp, R. (1998). Committed to memory: How we remember and why we forget. New York: Crown.
19. Spiegel, D., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (1970). Assignment of publication credit: Ethics and practices of psychologists. American Psychologist, 25, 738-747.
20. Thompson, B. (1994). The big picture(s) in deciding authorship order. American Psychologist, 49, 1095-1096.