Systematic review on recent advances in the surgical management of rectal prolapse

Minerva Chirurgica

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 71-80

  Murphy, Patrick B ^a   Wanis, Kerollos ^a   Schlachta, Christopher M ^a   Alkhamesi, Nawar A ^a  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Colorectal surgery; Laparoscopy; Rectal prolapse

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; PROCEDURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECTUM PROLAPSE; RECURRENT DISEASE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECTAL PROLAPSE; RECURRENCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85013057132     PISSN: 00264733     EISSN: 18271626     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.16.07205-9     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Elneil, S. Complex pelvic floor failure and associated problems. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 23, 555-73 (2009).
2. Stein, E. A. & Stein, D. E. Rectal procidentia: diagnosis and management. Gastrointest. Endosc. Clin. N. Am. 16, 189-201 (2006).
3. Kairaluoma, M. V & Kellokumpu, I. H. Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse. Scand. J. Surg. 94, 207-10 (2005).
4. Varma, M., Rafferty, J. & Buie, W. D. Practice parameters for the management of rectal prolapse. Dis. Colon Rectum 54, 1339-46 (2011).
5. Bordeianou, L. et al. Does incontinence severity correlate with quality of life? Prospective analysis of 502 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis. 10, 273-9 (2008).
6. Tou, S., Sr, B. & Rl, N. Surgery for complete (full-thickness) rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Rev. (2015). doi:10.1002/14651858. CD001758.pub3.www.cochranelibrary.com
7. Murphy, P., Schlachta, C. & Alkhamesi, N. Surgical management for rectal prolapse: an update. Minerva Chir. 70, 73-82 (2015).
8. Formijne Jonkers, H. a. et al. Evaluation and surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: an international survey. Color. Dis. 15, 115-119 (2013).
9. Liberati, A. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 6, e1000100 (2009).
10. Wells, G. et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical-epidemiology/. (Accessed: 29th November 2015)
11. Byrne, C. M. et al. Long-term functional outcomes after laparoscopic and open rectopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis. Colon Rectum 51, 1597-1604 (2008).
12. Carpelan-Holmström, M., Kruuna, O. & Scheinin, T. Laparoscopic rectal prolapse surgery combined with short hospital stay is safe in elderly and debilitated patients. Surg. Endosc. Other Interv. Tech. 20, 1353-1359 (2006).
13. Clark, C. E., Jupiter, D. C., Thomas, J. S. & Papaconstantinou, H. T. Rectal prolapse in the elderly: Trends in surgical management and outcomes from the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program database. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 215, 709-714 (2012).
14. de Hoog, D. E. N. M. et al. Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 24, 1201-6 (2009).
15. de Oliveira Jr, O. et al. Comparative outcomes of elderly patients undergoing Altemeier procedure versus laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Asian J. Endosc. Surg. 3, 28-32 (2010).
16. Elagili, F., Gurland, B., Liu, X., Church, J. & Ozuner, G. Comparing perineal repairs for rectal prolapse: Delorme versus Altemeier. Tech. Coloproctol. 19, 521-525 (2015).
17. Fang, S. H. et al. Is the abdominal repair of rectal prolapse safer than perineal repair in the highest risk patients? An NSQIP analysis. Dis. Colon Rectum 55, 1167-1172 (2012).
18. Fleming, F. J. et al. It's the procedure not the patient: The operative approach is independently associated with an increased risk of complications after rectal prolapse repair. Color. Dis. 14, 362-368 (2012).
19. Formijne Jonkers, H. A. et al. Laparoscopic resection rectopexy versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Tech. Coloproctol. 18, 641-646 (2014).
20. Heemskerk, J. et al. Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: A comparative study on costs and time. Dis. Colon Rectum 50, 1825-1830 (2007).
21. Kariv, Y. et al. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Surg. Endosc. 20, 35-42 (2006).
22. Magruder, J. T., Efron, J. E., Wick, E. C. & Gearhart, S. L. Laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse to reduce surgical-site infections and length of stay. World J. Surg. 37, 1110-1114 (2013).
23. Makela-Kaikkonen, J. et al. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: A matched-pairs study of operative details and complications. Tech. Coloproctol. 18, 151-155 (2014).
24. Mustain, W., Davenport, D., Parcells, J., Vargas, H. & Hourigan, J. Abdominal versus Perineal Approach for Treatment of Rectal Prolapse : Comparable Safety in a Propensity-matched Cohort. Am. Surg. 79, 686-693 (2013).
25. Riansuwan, W., Hull, T. L., Bast, J., Hammel, J. P. & Church, J. M. Comparison of perineal operations with abdominal operations for full-thickness rectal prolapse. World J. Surg. 34, 1116-1122 (2010).
26. Ricciardi, R. et al. Which operative repair is associated with a higher likelihood of reoperation after rectal prolapse repair? Am. Surg. 80, 1128-1131 (2014).
27. Russell, M. M. et al. Complications After Rectal Prolapse Surgery: Does approach matter. Dis. Colon Rectum 55, 450-458 (2012).
28. Young, M. T. et al. Surgical treatments for rectal prolapse: how does a perineal approach compare in the laparoscopic era? Surg. Endosc. 29, 607-13 (2015).
29. Sahoo, M. R., Thimmegowda, A. K. & Gowda, M. S. A single centre comparative study of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy versus suture rectopexy. J. Minim. Access Surg. 10, 18-22 (2014).
30. Senapati, a et al. PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 15, 858-68 (2013).
31. Youssef, M. et al. Comparative study between Delorme operation with or without postanal repair and levateroplasty in treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Int. J. Surg. 11, 52-58 (2013).
32. Mehmood, R. K. et al. Short-term outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Is robotic superior? Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 29, 1113-8 (2014).
33. Mäkelä-Kaikkonen, J. et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external, internal rectal prolapse and enterocele: a randomised controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. n/a-n/a (2016). doi:10.1111/codi.13309
34. Karas, J. R. et al. No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilization for full-thickness rectal prolapse: A randomized controlled trial. Dis. Colon Rectum 54, 29-34 (2011).
35. Foppa, C., Martinek, L., Arnaud, J. P. & Bergamaschi, R. Ten-year follow up after laparoscopic suture rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 16, 809-14 (2014).
36. Tou, S., Brown, S., Malik, A. & Nelson, R. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults (Review). Cochrane Rev. (2009).
37. Gultekin, F. A. et al. Safety of Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy in the Elderly. Dis. Colon Rectum 58, 339-343 (2015).
38. Hotouras, A. et al. A systematic review of the literature on the surgical management of recurrent rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. (2015). doi:10.1111/codi.12946
39. El Muhtaseb, M. S., Bartolo, D. C. C., Zayiae, D. & Salem, T. Colonic transit before and after resection rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Tech. Coloproctol. 18, 273-276 (2013).
40. McKee, R. F., Lauder, J. C., Poon, F. W., Aitchison, M. A. & Finlay, I. G. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 174, 145-8 (1992).
41. Luukkonen, P., Mikkonen, U. & Järvinen, H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 7, 219-22 (1992).
42. Brown, S. The evidence base for rectal prolapse surgery: is resection rectopexy worth the risk? Tech. Coloproctol. 18, 221-222 (2013).
43. Loygue, J. et al. Rectopexy to the promontory for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Report of 257 cases. Dis. Colon Rectum 27, 356-9 (1984).
44. D'Hoore, A. & Penninckx, F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg. Endosc. 20, 1919-23 (2006).
45. Samaranayake, C. B. et al. Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Color. Dis. 12, 504-512 (2009).
46. Dyrberg, D. L., Nordentoft, T. & Rosenstock, S. Laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse is a safe procedure in older patients : A prospective follow-up study. (2015).
47. Rothenhoefer, S. et al. DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - Delorme's procedure versus resection rectopexy. Trials 13, 155 (2012).
48. Formijne Jonkers, H. a, Consten, E. C. J. & Wexner, S. D. Reply to correspondence on: Laparoscopic resection rectopexy versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse by H. A. Formijne Jonkers et al. Tech. Coloproctol. 18, 859 (2014).
49. Wexner, S. An International Double Cohort Study to Compare Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy With Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy (LaProS). Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01595412.