Complications after rectal prolapse surgery: Does approach matter?

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 450-458

  Russell, Marcia McGory ^a   Read, Thomas E ^a   Roberts, Patricia L ^a   Hall, Jason F ^a   Marcello, Peter W ^a   Schoetz, David J ^a   Ricciardi, Rocco ^a  

^a LAHEY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Abdominal; Complications; Outcomes; Perineal; Rectal prolapse

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGED; ALBUMIN BLOOD LEVEL; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; FEMALE; HEART ARREST; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; RECTUM PROLAPSE; RECTUM SURGERY; RESUSCITATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; RISK FACTOR; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; SURGICAL INFECTION; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

AGED; BODY MASS INDEX; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RECTAL PROLAPSE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84859778772     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823f86b8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Mills S. Rectal prolapse. In: Beck DE, Roberts PL, Saclarides TH, Senagore AJ, Samos MJ, Wexner SD, eds. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2011: 549-563.
2. Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; CD001758.
3. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Available at: http://www.acsnsqip.org. Accessed July 27, 2011.
4. Health Information Privacy. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/ . Accessed July 27, 2011.
5. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: The first national, validated, outcomebased, risk-Adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228:491-507. (Pubitemid 30194393)
6. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: User Guide for the 2009 Participant Use Data File. Available at: https://www.acsnsqip.org/main/puf/documents/pdfs/ACS-NSQIP-Participant-User- Data-File-User-Guide.pdf. Accessed July 27, 2011.
7. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, et al. Comparison of hospital performance in nonemergency versus emergency colorectal operations at 142 hospitals. J AmColl Surg. 2010;210:155-165.
8. Boccasanta P, Rosati R, Venturi M, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic rectopexy with open technique in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse: Clinical and functional results. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8:460-465. (Pubitemid 29008793)
9. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Barbieri S, Roviaro G. Impact of new technologies on the clinical and functional outcome of Altemeier's procedure: A randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:652-660. (Pubitemid 43723814)
10. Galili Y, Rabau M. Comparison of polyglycolic acid and polypropylene mesh for rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse. Eur J Surg. 1997;163:445-448. (Pubitemid 27278722)
11. Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Jarvinen H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: A prospective, randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992;7:219-222. (Pubitemid 23014437)
12. McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Aitchison MA, Finlay IG. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;174:145-148.
13. Mollen RM, Kuijpers JH, van Hoek F. Effects of rectal mobilization and lateral ligaments division on colonic and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1283-1287.
14. Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC, Lewis AA. Prospective randomized trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1994;81:904-906. (Pubitemid 24204825)
15. Salkeld G, Bagia M, Solomon M. Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg. 2004;91: 1188-1191. (Pubitemid 39179464)
16. Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2002;89:35-39. (Pubitemid 34031304)
17. Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: Results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg. 1991;78:1431-1433.
18. Winde G, Reers B, Nottberg H, Berns T, Meyer J, Bunte H. Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy with absorbable mesh-graft for treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Eur J Surg. 1993;159:301-305. (Pubitemid 23205760)
19. Selvaggi F. Scotto di Carlo E, Silvestri L, Festa L, Piegari V. Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: A randomized study [abstract]. Br J Surg. 1993;80:S89.
20. Karas JR, Uranues S, Altomare DF, et al. No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilization for full-thickness rectal prolapse: A randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54:29-34.
21. Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C, Keighley MR. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1994;81:302-304. (Pubitemid 24122384)
22. Azimuddin K, Khubchandani IT, Rosen L, Stasik JJ, Riether RD, Reed JF III. Rectal prolapse: A search for the "best" operation. Am Surg. 2001;67:622-627. (Pubitemid 33739072)