It's the procedure not the patient: The operative approach is independently associated with an increased risk of complications after rectal prolapse repair

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 362-368

  Fleming, F J ^a   Kim, M J ^a   Gunzler, D ^a   Messing, S ^a   Monson, J R T ^a   Speranza, J R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Rectal prolapse, surgery, complications

Indexed keywords

STEROID;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAZARD RATIO; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; INCISIONAL INFECTION; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; ORGAN SPACE INFECTION; PERINEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOPEXY; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTUM PROLAPSE; RECTUM RESECTION; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; RISK FACTOR; SEPSIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM;

ABDOMEN; AGED; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERINEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECTAL PROLAPSE; RECTUM; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84863011985     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02616.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Wassef R, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Rectal prolapse. Curr Probl Surg 1986; 23: 397-451.
2. Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 63-73.
3. Kim DS, Tsang CB, Wong WD, Lowry AC, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 460-6; discussion 6-9.
4. Riansuwan W, Hull TL, Bast J, Hammel JP, Church JM. Comparison of perineal operations with abdominal operations for full-thickness rectal prolapse. World J Surg 2010; 34: 1116-22.
5. Safar B, Vernava AM. Abdominal approaches for rectal prolapse. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2008; 21: 94-9.
6. Khuri SF. The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery. Surgery 2005; 138: 837-43.
7. ACS-NSQIP (2009) Program Specifics. Surgical Case Inclusion/Exclusion overview. (accessed 30 July 2010).
8. Association AM. (2007) Current Procedural Terminology 2008. American Medical Association, Chicago.
9. Hoel AT, Skarstein A, Ovrebo KK. Prolapse of the rectum, long-term results of surgical treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 201-7.
10. Sajid M, Siddiqui MR, Baig MK. Open versus laparoscopic repair of full thickness rectal prolapse: a re-meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 515-25.
11. Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 35-9.
12. Boccasanta P, Rosati R, Venturi M et al. Comparison of laparoscopic rectopexy with open technique in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse: clinical and functional results. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998; 8: 460-5.
13. Purkayastha S, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T et al. A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1930-40.
14. Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, Hall BL. Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208: 1009-16.