Surgery for complete (full-thickness) rectal prolapse in adults

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2015, Issue 11, 2015, Pages

  Tou, Samson ^a   Brown, Steven R ^b   Nelson, Richard L ^b  

^a ROYAL DERBY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONSTIPATION; DEFECATION DISORDER; DIATHERMY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FULL THICKNESS RECTAL PROLAPSE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE FUNCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; OPEN SURGERY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOPEXY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RECTUM PROLAPSE; RECTUM RESECTION; RECTUM SURGERY; REVIEW; SIGMOIDECTOMY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL STAPLING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; META ANALYSIS; RECTAL PROLAPSE; RECTUM;

ADULT; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECTAL PROLAPSE; RECTUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84964696127     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001758.pub3     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Boccasanta P, Rosati R, Venturi M, Montorsi M, Cioffi U, De Simone M, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic rectopexy with open technique in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse: clinical and functional results. Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy 1998;8(6):460-5.
2. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Barbieri S, Roviaro G. Impact of new technologies on the clinical and functional outcome of Altemeier's procedure: a randomized, controlled trial. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2006;49(5):652-60.
3. Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C, Keighley MR. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perianal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse. The British Journal of Surgery 1994;81(2):302-4.
4. Galili Y, Rabau M. Comparison of polyglycolic acid and polypropylene mesh for rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse. The European Journal of Surgery 1997;163(6):445-8.
5. Karas J, Uranues S, Altomare D, Sokmen S, Krivokapic Z, Hoch J, et al. No rectopexy versus rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomized multicenter trial [Abstract]. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2010;53(4):534-5. Abstract no. 23.
6. Karas JR, Uranues S, Altomare DF, Sokmen S, Krivokapic Z, Hoch J, et al. No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilisation for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. Diseases of Colon and Rectum 2011;54(1):29-34.
7. NCT01022034 Pexy vs. no pexy in abdominal surgery for full thickness rectal prolapse in adults: a randomized controlled trial. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01022034 (accessed 3 February 2015).
8. Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Jarvinen H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy versus rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1992;7(4):219-22.
9. Mckee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Aitchison MA, Finlay IG. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstretics 1992;174(2):145-8.
10. Mollen RM, Kuijpers JH, Van Hoek F. Effect of rectal mobilisation and lateral sphincter division on colonic and anorectal function. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2000;43(9):1283-7.
11. Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC, Lewis AA. Prospective randomized trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. The British Journal of Surgery 1994;81(6):904-6.
12. Selvaggi F, Scotto di Carlo E, Silvestri L, Festa L, Piegari V. Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: a randomised study [Abstract]. The British Journal of Surgery 1993;80(Suppl):S89.
13. ISRCTN01911755 Randomised trial of rectal prolapse surgery. http://isrctn.com/ISRCTN01911755 (accessed 4 February 2015).
14. Middleton LJ. Information for abdominal versus perineal approach in the PROSPER trial [personal communication]. Email to: S Tou 1 November 2013.
15. Senapati A, Gray RG, Middleton LJ, Harding J, Hills RK, Armitage NCM, et al. PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Disease 2013;15(7):858-68.
16. Salkeld G, Bagia M, Solomon M. Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy. The British Journal of Surgery 2004;91(9):1188-91.
17. Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. The British Journal of Surgery 2002;89(1):35-9.
18. Speakman CTM, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study. The British Journal of Surgery 1991;78(12):1431-3.
19. Winde G, Reers B, Nottberg H, Berns T, Meyer J, Bunte H. Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy with absorbable mesh-graft for treatment of complete rectal prolapse. The European Journal of Surgery 1993;59(5):301-5.
20. NCT01656369 Comparative study between Delorme operation with or without postanal repair and levatorplasty in treatment of complete rectal prolapse. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01656369 (accessed 3 February 2015).
21. Youssef M, Thabet W, El Nakeeb A, Magdy A, Alla EA, El Nabeey MA, et al. Comparative study between Delorme operation with or without postanal repair and levateroplasty in treatment of complete rectal prolapse. International Journal of Surgery 2013;11(1):52-8.
22. Gupta PJ. Randomized controlled study: radiofrequency coagulation and plication versus ligation and excision technique for rectal mucosal prolapse. American Journal of Surgery 2006;192(2):155-60.
23. Nelson R, Spitz J, Pearl RK, Abcarian H. What role does full rectal mobilization play in the treatment of rectal prolapse?. Techniques in Coloproctology 2001;5(1):33-5.
24. Raftopoulos Y, Senagore AJ, Di Giuro G, Bergamaschi R. Recurrence rates after abdominal surgery for complete rectal prolapse: a multicenter pooled analysis of 643 individual patient data. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2005;48:1200-6.
25. ACTRN12605000748617 Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic resection rectopexy compared with fixation rectopexy for rectal prolapse. http://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12605000748617.aspx (accessed 4 February 2015).
26. DRKS00000482 Randomized trial to compare two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - surgical mucosal reduction according to Delorme vs. laparoscopic resection rectopexy (DeloRes-Trial) - DeloRes. http://www.drks.de/DRKS00000482 (accessed 4 February 2015).
27. Kienle P, Rothenhoefer S, Herrle F, Herold A, Post S. DeloRes - A randomized controlled multicentre trial to compare two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse [Abstract]. Colorectal Disease 2009;11(Suppl s2):63. Abstract number TS1.
28. Post S. Randomized controlled multi-centre trial to compare two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - Delorme's procedure vs laparoscopic resection rectopexy (DeloRes) [Abstract]. Colorectal Disease 2009;11(Suppl s2):63. Abstract number TS5.
29. Rothenhoefer S, Herrle F, Herold A, Joos A, Bussen D, Kieser M, et al. DeloRes trial: study protocol for a randomized trial comparing two standardized surgical approaches in rectal prolapse - Delorme's procedure versus resection rectopexy. Trials 2012;13:155.
30. Makela-Kaikkonen J, Rautio T, Klintrup K, Takala H, Vierimaa M, Paakko E, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse or intussusception: A randomized controlled trial [Abstract]. Colorectal Disease 2013;15(Suppl s3):19. Abstract number OP29.
31. Makela-Kaikkonen J, Rautio T, Koivurova S, Ohtonen P, Makela J. Functional and quality of life impact of laparoscopic or robotic ventral rectopexy to pelvic floor: a prospective randomised study [Abstract]. Colorectal Disease 2014;16(Suppl s3):40. Abstract number P020.
32. Makela-Kaikkonen J, Rautio T, Paakko E, Koivurova S, Ohtonen P, Makela J. Anatomic changes of laparoscopic or robotic ventral rectopexy to pelvic floor using MRI-defecography and POP-Q method: A prospective randomised study [Abstract]. Colorectal Disease 2014;16(Suppl s3):17 Abstract number OP39.
33. NCT00946205 Laparoscopic posterior rectopexy without mesh vs. laparoscopic anterior mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse - a prospective, double-blind, randomised study. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00946205 (accessed 3 February 2015).
34. Tarquini R, Luglio G, Celentano V, Antonelli G, Giglio MC, Sollazzo V, et al. Anterior mesh rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a single institution experience [Abstract]. European Surgical Research 2010;45(3-4):183. Abstract number 60.
35. Brown SR, Wadhawan H, Nelson RL. Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001757.pub2]
36. Byrne CM, Smith SR, Solomon MJ, Young JM, Eyers AA, Young CJ. Long-term functional outcomes after laparoscopic and open rectopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2008;51(11):1597-604.
37. El Muhtaseb MS, Bartolo DC, Zayiae D, Salem T. Colonic transit before and after resection rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Techniques in Coloproctology 2014;18(3):273-6.
38. Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Functional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical treatment. British Journal of Surgery 1997;84(7):904-11.
39. Fengler SA, Pearl RK, Prasad ML, Orsay CP, Cintron JR, Hambrick E, et al. Management of recurrent rectal prolapse. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 1997;40(7):832-4.
40. Foppa C, Martinek L, Arnaud JP, Bergamaschi R. Ten-year follow up after laparoscopic suture rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Colorectal Disease 2014;16(10):809-14.
41. McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime, Inc). Available from www.gradepro.org. GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool. Hamilton, ON, Canada: McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime, Inc). Available from www.gradepro.org, 2015.
42. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schunemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(4):380-2.
43. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(12):1311-6.
44. Guyatt GH, Thorlund K, Oxman AD, Walter SD, Patrick D, Furukawa TA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013;66(2):173-83.
45. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Santesso N, Helfand M, Vist G, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables-binary outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013;66(2):158-72.
46. Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
47. Karasick S, Spettell CM. The role of parity and hysterectomy on the development of pelvic floor abnormalities revealed by defecography. American Journal of Roentgenology 1997;169(6):1555-8.
48. Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Archives of Surgery 2005;140:63-73.
49. Madoff RD, Williams JG, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Long-term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 1992;87:101-4.
50. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5]
51. Marshman D, Percy J, Fielding I, Delbridge L. Rectal prolapse: relationship with joint mobility. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 1987;57(1):827-9.
52. Phillips RKS. A Companion to Specialist Surgical Practice: Colorectal Surgery. 3rd Edition. London: Elsevier Saunders, 2005.
53. Pikarsky AJ, Joo JS, Wexner SD, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Agachan F, et al. Recurrent rectal prolapse: what is the next good option?. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2000;43(9):1273-6.
54. Thomson Reuters. Reference Manager Professional Edition Version 12. New York: Thomson Reuters. New York: Thomson Reuters, 2012.
55. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
56. Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AEH, Plank LD, Bisset IP. Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Disease 2010;12(6):504-12.
57. Schoetz DJ, Veidenheimer MC. Rectal prolapse: pathogenesis and clinical features. Coloproctology in the pelvic floor. London: Butterworths, 1985.
58. Varma JS. Autonomic influences on colorectal motility and pelvic surgery. World Journal of Surgery 1992;16(5):811-9.
59. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gaudek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.
60. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1983;67(6):361-70.
61. Brazzelli M, Bachoo P, Grant A. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1999, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001758]
62. Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001758.pub2]