Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: A matched-pairs study of operative details and complications

Techniques in Coloproctology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 151-155

  Makela Kaikkonen J ^a   Rautio, T ^a   Klintrup, K ^a   Takala, H ^a   Vierimaa, M ^a   Ohtonen, P ^a   Makela J ^a  

^a OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Intussusception; Laparoscopic; Rectal prolapse; Robotic; Ventral rectopexy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; RECTAL PROLAPSE; RECURRENCE; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84895076306     PISSN: 11236337     EISSN: 1128045X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-013-1042-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD (2005) Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 140:63-73
2. Penninckx F, D'Hoore A, Sohier S, Kerremans R (1997) Abdominal resection rectopexy versus Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse: a predictable outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:49-50
3. Munz Y, Moorthy K, Kudchadkar R et al (2004) Robotic assisted rectopexy. Am J Surg 187:88-92
4. Wong MT, Meurette G, Rigaud J, Regenet N, Lehur PA (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 54:342-346
5. Baik SH (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery. Yonsei Med J 49:891-896
6. Heemskerk J, Zandbergen R, Maessen JG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2006) Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems. Surg Endosc 20:730-733
7. Maeso S, Resa M, Mayol JA et al (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci Surgical System in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252:254-262
8. Ayav A, Bresler L, Hubert J, Brunaud L, Boissel P (2005) Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Surg Endosc 19:1200-1203
9. de Hoog DE, Heemskerk J (2009) Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1201-1206
10. D'Hoore A, Penninckx F (2006) Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 20:1919-1923
11. Heemskerk J, de Hoog D, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy MD (2007) Robot assisted vs conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1825-1830
12. Bokhari M, Patel C, Ramos-Valadez D, Ragupathi M, Haas E (2011) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855-860
13. Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis P, Hanna GB (2012) Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4,852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1300-1310
14. Lebeau T, Rouprêt M, Ferhi K et al (2011) The role of a well-trained team on the early learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures: the example of radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot. doi: 10.1002/rcs435
15. Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:1-4
16. Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Chapman WH et al (2001) Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. Am Surg 234:475-484
17. D'Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91:1500-1505
18. Slawik S, Soulsby R, Carter H, Payne H, Dixon AR (2008) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Colorectal Dis 10:138-143
19. Lauretta A, Bellomo RE, Galanti F, Tonizzo CA, Infantino A (2012) Laparoscopic low ventral rectocolpopexy (LLVR) for rectal and rectogenital prolapse: surgical technique and functional results. Tech Coloproctol 16:477-483