Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles

Scientometrics

Volumn 112, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 241-254

  Jamali, Hamid R ^a  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Copyright compliance; Copyright infringement; Depositing; Journal articles; Open access; Researchers; ResearchGate; Self archiving

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013042112     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2291-4     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Björk, B. C., Laakso, M., Welling, P., & Paetau, P. (2014). Anatomy of green open access. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 237–255. doi:10.1002/asi.2296.
2. Cabanac, G. (2016). Bibliogifts in LibGen? A study of a text-sharing platform driven by biblioleaks and crowdsourcing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 874–884. doi:10.1002/asi.23445.
3. Chakraborty, N. (2012). Activities and reasons for using social networking sites by research scholars in NEHU: A study on Facebook and ResearchGate. Planner, 19–27.
4. Covey, D. T. (2009). Self-archiving journal articles: A case study of faculty practice and missed opportunity. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(2), 223–251. doi:10.1353/pla.0.0042.
5. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., & Probets, S. (2003a). RoMEO Studies 1: The impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 243–277. doi:10.1108/00220410310698239.
6. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., & Probets, S. (2003b). RoMEO studies 4: An analysis of journal publishers’ copyright agreements. Learned Publishing, 16(4), 293–308. doi:10.1087/095315103322422053.
7. Hanlon, A., & Ramirez, M. (2011). Asking for permission: A survey of copyright workflows for institutional repositories. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(2), 683–702.
8. Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H., & Terliesner, J. (2014). Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1145–1163. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3.
9. Howard, J. (2013). Posting your latest article? You might have to take it down, chronicles of higher education. http://www.chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/posting-your-latest-article-you-might-have-to-take-it-down/48865. 6 December 2013.
10. Inaba, R., & Yamazaki, R. (2015). Survey on copyright infringement of digital contents: A case study of Japanese University Students. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 657–660). Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21383-5_110.
11. Isiakpona, C. D. (2012). Undergraduate students’ Perception of copyright infringement: A case study of the University of Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, Paper 689. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/689.
12. Jamali, H. R., & Nabavi, M. (2015). Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1635–1651. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1642-2.
13. Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., & Herman, E. (2016). Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms. Research Evaluation, 25(1), 37–49. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvv032.
14. Jamali, H. R., Russell, B., Nicholas, D., & Watkinson, A. (2014). Do online communities support research collaboration? Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(6), 603–622. doi:10.1108/AJIM-08-2013-0072.
15. Kubalik, J., Matousek, K., Dolezal, J., & Necasky, M. (2011). Analysis of portal for social network of IT professionals. Journal of Systems Integration, 2(1), 21–28.
16. Laakso, M. (2014). Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics, 99(2), 475–494. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1205-3.
17. Library Connect. (2015). Beyond downloads: How scholars save & share research articles. https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/sites/default/files/Beyond_Downloads_infographic_2015.png.
18. Madhusudhan, M. (2012). Use of social networking sites by research scholars of the University of Delhi: A study. International Information and Library Review, 44(2), 100–113. doi:10.1080/10572317.2012.10762919.
19. Martín-Martín, A., Orduña-Malea, E., Ayllon, J. M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2016). The counting house: Measuring those who count. Presence of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in the Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter. EC3 Working Papers, 21. https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.02412.
20. Martín-Martín, A., Orduña-Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2014). Does Google scholar contain all highly cited documents (1950–2013)? EC3 Working Papers, 19. http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8464.
21. Nicholas, D., Clark, D., & Herman, E. (2016). ResearchGate: Reputation uncovered. Learned Publishing, 29(3), 173–182. doi:10.1002/leap.1035.
22. Nicholas, D., Herman, E., & Jamali, H. R. (2015). Emerging reputation mechanisms for scholars. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. doi:10.2791/891948.
23. Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Watkinson, A., Brown, D., Russell, B., & Jamali, H. R. (2013). Have digital repositories come of age? The views of library directors. Webology, 10(2), Article 111. http://www.webology.org/2013/v10n2/a111.pdf.
24. Oguz, F., & Assefa, S. (2014). Faculty members’ perceptions towards institutional repository at a medium-sized university: Application of a binary logistic regression model. Library Review, 63(3), 189–202. doi:10.1108/LR-07-2013-0088.
25. Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2016). ResearchGate como fuente de evaluación científica: desvelando sus aplicaciones bibliométricas. El profesional de la información (EPI), 25(2), 303–310.
26. Ortega, J. L. (2015). Disciplinary differences in the use of academic social networking sites. Online Information Review, 39(4), 520–536.
27. Palmer, C. L., Teffeau, L. C., & Newton, M. P. (2008). Identifying factors of success in CIC institutional repository development—final report. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/8981.
28. Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015). ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating and measuring scholars. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 876–889. doi:10.1002/asi.23236.
29. Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2016). ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. In press, doi:10.1002/asi.23675.
30. Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network, Nature, 512 (14 August), 126–129. http://www.nature.com/news/online-collaboration-scientists-and-the-social-network-1.15711.
31. Xia, J. (2007). Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Across disciplines. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(6), 647–654. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.020.
32. Xia, J., & Sun, L. (2007). Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Depositorship and full-text availability. Serials Review, 33(1), 14–21. doi:10.1080/00987913.2007.10765087.
33. Yu, M. C., Wu, Y. C. J., Alhalabi, W., Kao, H. Y., & Wu, W. H. (2016). ResearchGate: An effective altmetric indicator for active researchers? Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1001–1006. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.007.