The power of youth: How the bottom-up technology transmission from children to parents is related to digital (In)equality

International Journal of Communication

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1163-1186

  Correa, Teresa ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES   (Chile)

Author keywords

Digital media; Dyadic data; Family; ICTs; Socialization; Survey; Youth

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011591363     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19328036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Agostini, C., & Willington, M. (2012). Acceso y uso de Internet en Chile: Evolución y factores determinantes [Internet access and use in Chile: Evolution and predictors]. Revista Persona y Sociedad 26(1), 11-42.
2. Barnes, H. L., & Olson, D. H. (1985). Parent-adolescent communication and the circumplex model. Child Development, 56(2), 438. doi:10.2307/1129732
3. Bertaux, D. (1981). Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
4. Bianchi, S. M., & Casper, L. M. (2000). American families. Population Bulletin, 55(4), 1-44.
5. Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication, 17(1), 65-84. doi:10.1177/0267323102017001607
6. Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Brown, S., & Venkatesh, V. (2005). Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 399-426.
8. Cho, J., Gil de Zúñiga, H., Rojas, H., & Shah, D. V. (2003). Beyond access: The digital divide and Internet uses and gratifications. IT and Society, 1(4), 46-72.
9. Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 320-334. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x
10. Correa, T. (2010). The participation divide among "online experts": Experience, skills, and psychological factors as predictors of college students' Web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 71-92. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01532.x
11. Correa, T. (2014). Bottom-up technology transmission within families: Exploring how youths influence their parents in the usage of digital media with dyadic data. Journal of Communication, 64, 103-124. doi:10.1111/jcom.12067
12. Correa, T., & Jeong, S-H. (2011). Race and online content creation: Why minorities are actively participating in the Web. Information, Communication, and Society, 14(5), 638-659. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2010.514355
13. Correa, T., Straubhaar, J., Chen, W., & Spence, J. (2013). Brokering new technologies: The role of children in their parents' usage of the Internet. New Media and Society. 17(4), 483-500. doi:10.1177/1461444813506975
14. Darling, N., Cumsille, A., & Peña-Alampay, L. (2005). Rules, legitimacy of parental authority, and the obligation to obey in Chile, the Philippines, and the United States. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 108, 47-60. doi:10.1002/cd.127
15. Eynon, R., & Helsper, E. J. (2011). Adults learning online: Digital choice and/or digital exclusion? New Media & Society, 13(4), 534-551. doi:10.1177/1461444810374789
16. Fallows, D. (2005). How men and women use the Internet. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
17. García-Sánchez, I. M. (2010). (Re)shaping practices in translation: How Moroccan immigrant children and families navigate continuity and change. MediAzioni, 10, 182-214.
18. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/942/864
19. Hargittai E (2010) Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the 'Net Generation.' Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
20. Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication and Society, 11(2), 239-256. doi:10.1080/13691180801946150
21. Hayes, A. F. (2005). Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Hayes, A. F. (2012). My macros and code for SPSS and SAS. Retrieved from http://afhayes.com/spss-sas-and-mplus-macros-and-code.html
23. Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 924-936. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
24. Helsper, E. J. (2010). Genders and Internet use across generations and life stages. Communication Research, 37(3), 352-374. doi:10.1177/0093650209356439
25. Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model of digital inclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403-426. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x.
26. International Communication Union. (2013). World telecommunication/ICT indicators database. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
27. Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittani, M., boyd, d., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., et al. (2009). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Katz, V. S. (2010). How children of immigrants use media to connect their families with the community. Journal of Children and Media, 4(3), 28-315. doi:10.1080/17482798.2010.486136
29. Kennedy, T. L. M., Smith A., Wells, A. T., & Wellman, B. (2008). Networked families. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
30. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31. Kiesler, S., Lundmark, V, Zdaniuk, B.,., & Kraut, R. (2000). Troubles with the Internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 323-351. doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI1504_2
32. Klump, K. L., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G., (2000). Age differences in genetic and environmental influences on eating disorders and behaviors in preadolescent and adolescent female twins. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 239-251.
33. Kuczynski, L., & Parkin, C. M. (2007). Agency and bi-directionality in socialization: Interactions, transactions, and relational dialectics. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), The handbook of socialization (pp. 259-283). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34. Lin, C. (2003). An interactive communication technology adoption model. Communication Theory, 13(4), 345-365. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00296
35. Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2011). EU Kids Online final report. London: LSE. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/media%40lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20II%20(2009-11)/EUKidsOnlineIIReports/Final%20report.pdf
36. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media and Society 9(4), 671-696. doi:10.1177/1461444807080335
37. Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Cortesi, S., & Gasser, U. (2013). Teens and technology use. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
38. Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169-187. doi:10.1177/1367877912452486
39. Mangione, T. W., & Van Ness, J. H. (2009). Mail surveys. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), The Sage handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 475-497). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
40. Maynard, J. W., Fang, H., & Petri, M. (2012). Low socioeconomic status is associated with cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Journal of. Rheumatology, 39(4), 777-783. doi:10.3899/jrheum.110724
41. McDevitt, M., & Chaffee, S. (2000). Closing gaps in political communication and knowledge: Effects of a school intervention. Communication Research, 27(3), 259-292. doi:10.1177/009365000027003001
42. McDevitt, M., & Chaffee, S. (2002). From top-down to trickle-up influence: Revisiting assumptions about the family in political communication. Political Communication, 19(3), 281-301. doi:10.1080/01957470290055501
43. Meraz, S. (2008). Women and technology: How socialization created a gender gap. In P. M. Poindexter, S. Meraz, & A. Schmitz-Weiss (Eds.), Women, men and news: Divided and disconnected in the news media landscape (pp. 99-116). New York, NY: Routledge.
44. Moore, M., Slane, J., Minell, J. A., Burt, S. A., & Klump, K. L. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on sleep problems: A study of preadolescent and adolescent twins. Child Care Health Development, 37(5), 638-641. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01230.x
45. Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2003). Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 111-121. doi:10.1111/1540-6237.t01-1-8401007
46. Pan, S., & Jordan-Marsh, M. (2010). Internet use intention and adoption among Chinese older adults: From the expanded technology acceptance model perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1111-1119. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.015
47. Putney, N. M., & Bengston, V. L. (2002). Socialization and the family revisited. In R. A. Settersten & T. J. Owens (Eds.), New frontiers in socialization (pp. 165-194). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Jai
48. Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Ou, S., Arteaga, I. A., & White, B. A. (2011). School-based early childhood education and age-28 well-being: Effects by timing, dosage, and subgroup. Science, 333(6040), 360-364. doi:10.1126
49. Salinas, V. (2011). Socioeconomic differences according to family arrangements in Chile. Population Research Policy Review, 30, 677-699. doi:10.1007/s11113-011-9206-5
50. Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native-myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 61(4), 364-379. doi:10.1108/00012530910973776.
51. Straubhaar, J., Spence, J., Tufekci, Z., & Lentz, R. G. (2012). Inequity in the technopolis: Race, class, gender, and the digital divide in Austin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
52. Tilson, E. C., McBride, C. M., Lipkus, I. M., & Catalano, R. F. (2004). Testing the interaction between parent-child relationship factors and parent smoking to predict youth smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35(3), 182-189. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth
53. Tripp, L. M., & Herr-Stephenson, R. (2009). Making access meaningful: Latino young people using digital media at home and at school. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1190-1207. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01486.x
54. Valenzuela, A. (1999). Gender roles and settlement activities among children and their immigrant families. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 720-742. doi:10.1177/0002764299042004009
55. Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2011). Digital skills and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 13(6), 893-911. doi:10.1177/1461444810386774
56. Van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
57. Vaughn, B. E., Colvin, T. N., Azria, M. R., Caya, L., & Krzysik, L. (2001). Dyadic analyses of friendship in a sample of preschool-age children attending Head Start: Correspondence between measures and implications for social competence. Child Development, 72(3), 862-878. doi:10.1111/1467
58. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Wheelock, J. (1992). Personal computers, gender, and an institutional model of the household. In R. Silverstone & E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces (pp. 97-112). London, UK: Routledge.
60. Wong, J., & Tseng, V. (2008). Political socialization in immigrant families: Challenging top-down parental socialization models. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(1), 151-168. doi:10.1080/13691830701708742
61. World Internet Project Chile. (2014). WIP Chile 2014: Usuarios de internet y comercio electrónico [World Internet Project Chile 2014: Internet users and e-commerce]. Santiago, Chile: Pontificia Universidad Católica and Cámara de Comercio de Santiago.