Bottom-Up Technology Transmission Within Families: Exploring How Youths Influence Their Parents' Digital Media Use With Dyadic Data

Journal of Communication

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 103-124

  Correa, Teresa ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894929119     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12067     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Barnes, H. L., & Olson, D. H. (1985). Parent-adolescent communication and the circumplex model. Child Development, 56(2), 438.
2. Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (2000). Qualitative researching with text, image, and sound: A practical handbook. London, England: Sage.
3. Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 56-95. doi:10.1177/0272431691111004.
4. Beatty, S. E., & Talpade, S. (1994). Adolescent influence in family decision-making. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 332-341.
5. Bianchi, S. M., & Casper, L. M. (2000). American families. Population Bulletin, 55(4), 1-44.
6. Booth, A., & Johnson, D. (1988). Premarital cohabitation and marital success. Journal of Family Issues, 9(2), 255-272.
7. Brown, B. B., Bakken, J. P., Nguyen, J., & von Bank, H. G. (2007). Sharing information about peer relations: Parents and adolescent opinions and behaviors in Hmong and African American families. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 116, 67-82. doi:10.1002/cad.
8. Buijzen, M. & Valkenburg, P. M. (2008). Observing purchase-related parent-child communication in retail environments: A developmental and socialization perspective. Human Communication Research, 34, 50-69. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00313.x
9. Burton, L., Allison, K. W., & Obeidallah, D. (1995). Social context and adolescence: Perspectives on development among inner-city African-American teens. In L. J. Crockett & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Pathways through adolescence (pp. 119-138). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Cho, J., Gil de Zúñiga, H., Rojas, H., & Shah, D. V. (2003). Beyond access: the digital divide and Internet uses and gratifications. IT & Society, 1(4), 46-72.
11. Clark, L. S. (2009). Digital media and the generation gap. Information, Communication, & Society, 12(3), 388-407. doi:10.1080/13691180902823845.
12. Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 320-334. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.
13. Correa, T. (2010). The participation divide among "web experts": Experience, skills, and psychological factors as predictors of college students' web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 71-92. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01532.x.
14. Correa, T., & Jeong, S. H. (2011). Race and online content creation: Why minorities are actively participating in the Web. Information, Communication, & Society, 14(5), 638-659. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2010.514355.
15. Correa, T., Straubhaar, J., Spence, J., & Chen, W. (in press). Brokering new technologies: The role of children in their parents' usage of the Internet. New Media and Society.
16. Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Darling, N., Cumsille, A., & Peña-Alampay, L. (2005). Rules, legitimacy of parental authority, and the obligation to obey in Chile, the Philippines, and the United States. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 108, 47-60. doi:10.1002/cd.127.
18. Dholakia, R. R., Dholakia, N., & Kshetri, N. (2004). Gender and Internet usage. In H. Bidgoli (Ed.), The Internet encyclopedia (Vol. 2, pp. 12-22). New York, NY: John Wiley.
19. Eron, L. D. (1982). Parent-child interaction, television violence, and aggression of children. American Psychologist, 37(2), 197-211.
20. Fortunati, L., & Taipale, S. (2012). Women's emotions toward the mobile phone. Feminist Media Studies, 12(4), 438-549. doi:10.1080/14680777.2012.741870.
21. Godoy, S., & Gálvez, M. (2011). The corresponding digital divide: Barriers and facilitators of the use of ICTs in middle and lower-middle class parents in Chile. Revista CTS, 18(6), 199-219.
22. Grusec, J. E., & Davidov, M. (2007). Socialization in the family: The role of parents. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 284-308). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
23. Haddon, L. (2006). The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Information Society, 22, 195-203. doi:10.1080/01972240600791325.
24. Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital Inequality: Differences in young adults' use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602-621. doi:10.1177/0093650208321782
25. Herring, S. C. (2008). Questioning the generational divide: Technological exoticism and adult construction of online youth identity. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 71-92). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
26. Horst, H. (2009). Families. In M. Ito, H. Horst, M. Bittanti, d. boyd, S. Herr-Stephenson, P. G. Lange, Tripp. (Eds.), Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Living and learning with new media. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
27. Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., boyd, d., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., Tripp. (2009). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the Digital Youth Project. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
28. ITU (2012). World telecommunication/ICT indicators database. Geneva, Switzerland: International Communication Union.
29. Kam, J. A. (2011). The effects of language brokering frequency and feelings on Mexican-heritage youth's mental health and risky behavior. Journal of Communication, 61, 455-475. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01552.x.
30. Katz, V. S. (2010). How children of immigrants use media to connect their families with the community. Journal of Children and Media, 4(3), 28-315. doi:10.1080/17482798.2010.486136.
31. Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D. A., y Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
32. Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007-1022, doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.1007
33. Kiesler, S., Zdaniuk, B., Lundmark, V., & Kraut, R. (2000). Troubles with the Internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 323-351.
34. Kuczynski, L., & Navara, G. (2005). Sources of change in theories of socialization and internalization. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 299-327). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Kuczynski, L., & Parkin, C. M. (2007). Agency and bidirectionality in socialization: Interactions, transactions, and relational dialectics. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), The handbook of socialization (pp. 259-283). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
36. Lin, C. (2003). An interactive communication technology adoption model. Communication Theory, 13(4), 345-365.
37. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 9(4), 671-696. doi:10.1177/1461444807080335.
38. McDevitt, M., & Chaffee, S. (2000). Closing gaps in political communication and knowledge: Effects of a school intervention. Communication Research, 27(3), 259-292. doi:10.1177/009365000027003001.
39. Palan, K. M., & Wilkes, R. E. (1997). Adolescent-parent interaction in family decision-making. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 159-169.
40. Reitman, D., Rhode, P. C., Hupp, S. D. A., Altobello, C. (2002). Development and validation of the parental authority questionnaire. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24(2), 119-127.
41. Ribak, R. (2001). "Like immigrants": Negotiating power in the face of the home computer. New Media and Society, 3(2), 220-238. doi:10.1177/1461444801003002005.
42. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (Vol., 4th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
43. Rosenblum, K. (1987). The in-depth interview: Between science and sociability. Sociological Forum, 2(2), 388-400.
44. Salinas, V. (2011). Socioeconomic differences according to family arrangements in Chile. Population Research, 30, 677-699. doi:10.1007/s11113-011-9206-5.
45. Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native-myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 61(4), 364-379. doi:10.1108/00012530910973776.
46. Sieving, R. E., McNeely, C. S., & Blum, R. V. (2000). Maternal expectations, mother-child connectedness, and adolescent sexual debut. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 154, 809-816.
47. Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London, England: Routledge.
48. Silverstone, R., & Hirsch, E. (1992). Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. London, England: Routledge.
49. Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E., & Morley, D. (1992). Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces, (Eds). R. Silverstone & E. Hirsch (pp. 15-31). London: Routledge.
50. Smetana, J. G. (1995). Parenting styles and conceptions of parental authority during adolescence. Child Development, 66(2), 299-316.
51. Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Darling, N., Mounts, N. S., & Dornbusch, S. N. (1994). Over-time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent and neglectful families, 65, 754-770. doi:0009-3920/94/6503-000501.00
52. Straubhaar, J., Spence, J., Tufekci, Z., & Lentz, R. G. (2012). Inequity in the technopolis: Race, class, gender, and the digital divide in Austin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
53. Torche, F. (2005). Privatization reform and inequality of educational opportunity: The case of Chile. Sociology of Education, 78, 316-343.
54. Tripp, L. M., & Herr-Stephenson, R. (2009). Making access meaningful: Latino young people using digital media at home and at school. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1190-1207. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01486.
55. Van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56. Wheelock, J. (1992). Personal computers, gender, and an institutional model of the household. In R. Silverstone & E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces (pp. 97-112). London, England: Routledge.
57. Williams, A., & Nussbaum, J. F. (2001). Intergenerational communication across the life span. New York, NY: Routledge.
58. WIP Chile (2011). Usos y prácticas en el mundo de Internet. Santiago, Chile: World Internet Project Chile.
59. Zickuhr, K. (2010). Generations 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.