Mutual misunderstanding: Preservice science teachers’ and instructors’ mismatching(?) priorities

Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 313-330

  Barrett, Sarah Elizabeth ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011457082     PISSN: 14926156     EISSN: 19424051     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14926150802506282     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alsop, S., & Pedretti, E. (2001). Science, technology and society. In S. Alsop & K. Hicks (Eds.), Teaching science (pp. 193-208). London: Kogan Page.
2. Barrett, S. E. (2007). Teacher candidates’ beliefs about including socioscientific issues in physics and chemistry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto.
3. Barrett, S. E. & Nieswandt, M. (2007, April). Teaching science for social justice through socioscientific issues: Teacher candidates’ beliefs.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans.
4. Barrett, S. E., & Nieswandt, M. (2008). The role of science education in fostering democracy: Perspectives of future teachers. In D. E. Lund & P. R. Carr (Eds.), Doing democracy: Striving for political literacy and social justice (pp. 231-246). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
5. Barrett, S. E., & Pedretti, E. (2006). Contrasting orientations: STSE for social reconstruction or social reproduction? School Science and Mathematics,106(5), 21-31.
6. Barton, A. C. (2003). Teaching science for social justice. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Becher, T. & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
8. Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2006). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education,91(3), 347-370.
9. Britzman, D. P. (2007). Teacher education as uneven development: Toward a psychology of uncertainty. International Journal ofLeadership in Education, 10(1), 1-12.
10. Brouwer, N., & Korthagen, F. (2005). Can teacher education make a difference?American Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 153-224.
11. Bryan, L., & Atwater, M. N. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Science Education, 86(6), 821-839.
12. Carlone, H. B. (2003). Innovative science within and against a culture of “achievement.”Science Education,87(3), 307-328.
13. Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(4), 392-414.
14. Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1996). Science teachers’ social conscience and the role of controversial issues in the teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,33(3), 319-333.
15. De Boer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(6), 582-601.
16. Friedrichse, P.M. & Dana, T. M. (2005). Substantive-level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers’ science teaching orientations. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 42(2), 218-244.
17. Greene, M. (1991). Teaching: The question of personal reality. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Staffdevelopmentfor education in the 90’s: New demands, new realities, new perspectives (pp. 3-14). New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670.
19. Holt-Reynolds, D. (1992). Personal history-based beliefs as relevant prior knowledge in course work. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 325-349.
20. Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review ofEducational Research, 72(2), 177-228.
21. Marbach-Ad, G. & McGinnis, J. R. (2008). To what extent do reform-prepared upper elementary and middle school science teachers maintain their beliefs and intended instructional actions as they are inducted into schools? Journal ofScience Teacher Education, 19(2), 157-182.
22. Norris, S., & Phillips, L. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224-240.
23. Page, M. L., Rudney, G. L., & Marxen, C. E. (2004). Leading preservice teachers to water and helping them drink: How candidate teachability affects the gatekeeping and advocacy roles of teacher educators. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(2), 25-41.
24. Pedretti, E., Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., Romkey, L., & Jivraj, A. (2006). Promoting issues-based STSE perspectives in science teacher education: Problems of identity and ideology. Science Education, 17, 941-960.
25. Reeves, J. M., Cordova, R., & Kelly, G. J. (2004). Science literacy and academic identity formulation. Journal ofResearch inScience Teaching,41(10), 1111-1144.
26. Rosaen, C. L., & Schram, P. (1998). Becoming a member of the teaching profession: Learning a language of possibility. Teaching and Teacher Education,14(3), 283-303.
27. Roth, W.-M. & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy.New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
28. Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching,41(5), 513-536.
29. Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M. & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching,43(4), 353-376.
30. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(1), 112-138.
31. Saul, J. R. (2001). On equilibrium.Toronto: Viking.
32. Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R. & Hofstein, A. (2005). The importance of involving high-school chemistry teachers in the process of defining the operational meaning of “chemical literacy.” International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 323-344.
33. Somerville, M. A. (2006). The ethical imagination: Journeys of the human spirit. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.
34. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research.Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
35. Volante, L., & Earl, L. (2002). Teacher candidates’ perceptions of conceptual orientations in their preservice program. Canadian Journal of Education,27(4), 419-438.
36. Wien, C. A., & Dudley-Marling, C. (2001). Limited vision: The Ontario curriculum and outcome-based learning. In J. P. Portelli & P. Solomon (Eds.), The erosion of democracy in education: From critique to possibilities (pp. 99-116). Calgary: Detselig.
37. Yerrick, R., Parke, H. & Nugent, J. (1997). Struggling to promote deeply rooted change: The “filtering effect” of teachers’ beliefs on understanding transformational views of teaching science. Science Education,81(2), 137-159.
38. Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 7-39). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
39. Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343-367.