Substantive-level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers' science teaching orientations

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 218-244

  Friedrichsen, Patricia Meis ^a   Dana, Thomas M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEURISTIC METHODS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SCHOOL BUILDINGS;

CLASSROOMS; EDUCATION PROGRAMS; PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (PCK) MODEL; TEACHERS;

TEACHING;

EID: 14644394884     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20046     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson, C.W. & Smith, E.L. (1987). Teaching science. In J. Koehler (Ed.), The educator's handbook: A research perspective (pp. 84-111). New York: Longman.
2. Baxter, J.A. & Lederman, N.G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds), Examining pedagogical content knowledge the construct and its implications for science education (pp. 147-161). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Borko, H. & Putnam, R.T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
4. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Carlsen, W.S. (1999). Domains of teacher knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds), Examining pedagogical content knowledge the construct and its implications for science education (pp. 1333-144). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
6. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Erlandson, D.A., Harris, E.L., Skipper, B.L., & Allen, S.D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Freeman, D. (1991). To make the tacit explicit: Teacher education, emerging discourse, and conceptions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 439-454.
11. Friedrichsen, P.M. (2002). A substantive-level theory of highly-regarded secondary biology teachers' science teaching orientations. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 2496A (AAT 3060018).
12. Friedrichsen, P.M. & Dana, T. (2000, April). Exploring elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge for supporting children's scientific inquiry: Orientations to teaching science. National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
13. Friedrichsen, P.M. & Dana, T. (2003). Using a card sorting task to elicit and clarify science teaching orientations. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 291-301.
14. Gess-Newsome, J. & Lederman, N.G. (Eds.). (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
15. Glaser, B.G. (1992). Emergence vs. forcing; basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
16. Glaser, E.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
17. Greenwood, A.M. (2003). Factors influencing the development of career-change teachers' science teaching orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 217-234.
18. Grossman, P.L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Hashweh, M. (1987). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 109-120.
20. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in a postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Hewson, P.W. & Hewson, M.G.A.B. (1989). Analysis and use of a task for identifying conceptions of teaching science. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15, 191-209.
22. Kagan, D. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129-169.
23. Karplus, R. & Thier, H.D. (1967). A new look at elementary school science. Science curriculum improvement study. Chicago: Rand McNally.
24. Krathwoh, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook. II. The affective domain. New York: David McKay.
25. Lantz, O. & Kass, H. (1987). Chemistry teachers' functional paradigms. Science Education, 71, 117-134.
26. Lederman, N.G. & Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Reconceptualizing secondary science teacher education. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 199-213). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
27. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P.W., Love, N., & Stiles, K.E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
28. Loughran, J., Gunstone, R., Berry, A., Milroy, P., & Mulhall, P. (2000, April). Science cases in action: Developing an understanding of science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
29. Magnusson, S.J. & Palinscar, A.S. (1995). The learning environment as a site of science education reform. Theory into Practice, 34, 43-50.
30. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
31. Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J.S., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelly, B., & Meyer, K.M. (1994). Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers. Elementary School Journal, 94, 517-538.
32. Mason, C. (1999). The triad approach: A consensus for science teaching and learning. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 277-292). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
33. Merriam, S.B. (1988). Case study in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34. Mitchell, R.G., Jr. & Charmaz, K. (1996). Telling tales, writing stories: Postmodernist visions and realist images in ethnographic writing. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 25, 144-166.
35. Niess, M.L. & Scholz, J. (1999). Incorporating subject matter specific teaching strategies into secondary science teacher preparation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 257-276). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
36. Penick, J.E. & Yager, R.E. (1983). The search for excellence in science education. Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 621-623.
37. Roth, K.J. (1984). Using classroom observations to improve science teaching and curriculum materials. In C.W. Anderson (Ed.), Observing science classrooms: Observing science perspectives from research and practice. 1984 Yearbook of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. OH: ERIC Center for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
38. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
39. Smith, D.C. (1999). Changing our teaching: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in elementary science. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 163-197). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
40. Smith, D.C. & Neale, D.C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education, 5, 1-20.
41. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
42. Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical content knowledge in teacher education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 4, 99-110.
43. Tobin, K. & Fraser, B.J. (Eds.). (1987). Exemplary practice in science and mathematics education. Perth, WA: Curtin University of Technology.
44. Tobin, K. & McRobbie, C. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge and co-participation in science classrooms. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 215-234). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
45. Tsur, C. & Crawford, B.A. (2001, January). Prospective science teachers' knowledge of inquiry-based instruction in a secondary methods course. Paper presented at the annual international meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Costa Mesa, CA.
46. Veal, W.R. (1997). The evolution of pedagogical content knowledge in chemistry and physics prospective secondary teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
47. White, C.S. (1982). A validation study of the Barth-Shermis social studies preference scale. Theory and Research in Social Education, 10, 1-20.
48. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Zembal-Saul, C., Starr, M.L., & Krajcik, J.S. (1999). Constructing a framework for elementary science teaching using pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 237-256). Dordrecht: Kluwer.