Teacher candidates' perceptions of conceptual orientations in their preservice program

Canadian Journal of Education

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 419-438

  Volante, Louis ^a   Earl, Lorna ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Conceptual orientation; Constructivist teaching; Field based teacher education; Practicum; Preservice teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547888650     PISSN: 03802361     EISSN: 03802361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1602243     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Bertrand, J. T., Brown, J. E., & Ward, V. M. (1992). Techniques for analyzing focus group data. Evaluation Review, 16, 198-209.
2. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Educating: The academy's greatest failure or its most important future? Academe, 85(1), 26-33.
3. Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). What matters most: A competent teacher for every child. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 193-200.
4. Delaney, A. M. (1997). Quality assessment of professional degree programs. Research in Higher Education, 38, 241-264.
5. Dunleavy, F. (1996). "Give us something good": Defining effectiveness in teacher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
6. Feiman-Nemser, S. (1990). Teacher preparation: Structural and conceptual alternatives. In W. R. Houston, M. Huberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research in teacher education (pp. 212-233). New York: Macmillan.
7. Fullan, M., Galluzzo, G., Morris, P., & Watson, N. (1998). The rise and stall of teacher education reform. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
8. Goodlad, J. (1998). Teacher education: For what? Teacher Education Quarterly, 25(3), 16-23.
9. Hargreaves, A., & Jacka, N. (1995). Induction or seduction? Postmodern patterns of preparing to teach. Peabody Journal of Education, 70(3), 41-63.
10. Hartnett, A., & Naish, M. (1980). Technicians or social bandits? Some moral and political issues in the education of teachers: Explorations in the sociology of the school. In P. Woods (Ed.), Teacher Strategies: Explorations in the Sociology of the School (pp. 254-274). London, UK: Croom Helm.
11. Jackson, R. K., & Leroy, C. A. (1998). Eminent teachers' views on teacher education and development. Action in Teacher Education, 20(3), 15-29.
12. Kennedy, M. (1987). Inexact sciences: Professional education and the development of expertise. In E. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 14, pp. 133-167). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
13. Schwartz, H. (1996). The changing nature of teacher education. In J Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 3-13). New York: Macmillan.
14. Smith, J., & Souviney, R. (1997). The internship in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24(2), 5-19.
15. Taber, K. S. (2000). Case studies and generalizability: Grounded theory and research in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 469-487.
16. Wiseman, D. C. (1999). Research strategies for education. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
17. Zeichner, K. (1993). Traditions of practice in U.S. preservice teacher education programs. Teaching & Teacher Education, 9(1), 1-13.
18. Zimpher, N., & Howey, K. (1987). Adapting supervisory practice to different orientations of teaching competence. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2, 101-127