Developing countries in the WTO Trade Policy Review Mechanism

World Trade Review

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 419-455

  Ghosh, Arunabha ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011436926     PISSN: 14747456     EISSN: 14753138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1474745610000261     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Abbott Kenneth W. (1993), ‘“Trust, but Verify”: The Production of Information in Arms Control Treaties and Other International Agreements’, Cornell International Law Journal, 26: 1–58.
2. Abbott Kenneth W. and Snidal Duncan (1998), ‘Why States Act through Formal International Organizations’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1): 3–32.
3. Abbott Kenneth W. and Snidal Duncan (2009), ‘The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State’, in Mattli Walter and Woods Ngaire (eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, pp. 72–134.
4. Axelrod Robert and Keohane Robert O. (1986), ‘Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’, in Oye Kenneth A. (ed.), Cooperation Under Anarchy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, p. 226.
5. Blackhurst Richard (1988), ‘Strengthening GATT Surveillance of Trade-Related Policies’, in Hilf Meinharf and Petersman Ernst-Ulrich (eds.), The New GATT Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Legal and Economic Aspects, Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, pp. 123–155.
6. Borrmann Axel and Koopman Georg (2002), Adapting the WTO Trade Policy Reviews to the Needs of Developing Countries: Starting Points and Options, Hamburg: Hamburgisches Welt-Wirtschafts-Archiv.
7. Chayes Abram and Chayes Antonia Handler (1993), ‘On Compliance’, International Organization, 47(2): 175–205.
8. (1995), The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Curzon Price Victoria (1991), ‘GATT's New Trade Policy Review Mechanism’, The World Economy, 14(2): 227–238.
10. (1992), ‘New Institutional Developments in GATT’, Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, 1(1): 87–110.
11. da Motta Veiga Pedro (2005), ‘Brazil and the G20 Group of Developing Countries’, in Gallagher Peter, Low Patrick and Stoler Andrew L. (eds.), Managing the Challenges of WTO Participation: 45 Case Studies, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–119.
12. Dai Xinyuan (2002), ‘Information Systems in Treaty Regimes’, World Politics, 54(4): 405–436.
13. Dhar Biswajit and Kallummal Murali (2007), ‘Trade Policy Off the Hook: The Making of Indian Trade Policy since the Uruguay Round’, in Halle Mark and Wolfe Robert (eds.), Process Matters: Sustainable Development and Domestic Trade Transparency, Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development, pp. 183–240.
14. Downs George W. and Jones Michael A. (2002), ‘Reputation, Compliance and International Law’, Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1): S95–S114.
15. Dupont Cédric, Beverelli Cosimo, and Pézard Stéphanie (2006), ‘Learning in Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Some Results from Simulation for Developing Countries’, in Odell John S. (ed.), Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 145–174.
16. Francois Joseph F. (2001 a), ‘Maximising the Benefits of the Trade Policy Review Mechanism for Developing Countries’, in Hoekman Bernard and Martin Will (eds.), Developing Countries and the WTO: A Pro-Active Agenda, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 147–165.
17. (2001 b), ‘Trade Policy Transparency and Investor Confidence: Some Implications for an Effective Trade Policy Review Mechanism’, Review of International Economics, 9(2): 303–316.
18. GATT, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (1987 a), ‘The 1954/55 Review Session – Note by the Secretariat’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/W/12, 14 August.
19. (1987 b), ‘Communication from Jamaica’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/W/11, 8 July.
20. (1987 c), ‘Communication from Canada’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/W/10, 2 July.
21. (1987 d), ‘Initial Submission by the United States to the Uruguay Round Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/W/9, 23 June.
22. (1987), ‘Communication from Japan – Proposal for the Trade Policy Review in the GATT’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/W/8, 23 June.
23. (1987 f), ‘Existing Surveillance Functions in the GATT – Note by the Secretariat’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/W/3, 9 June.
24. (1987 g), ‘Communication from Australia’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/W/1, 3 April.
25. (1987 h), ‘Meeting of 28 September 1987 – Note by the Secretariat’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/3, 8 October.
26. (1987 i), ‘Meeting of 23 June 1987 – Note by the Secretariat’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/2, 26 June.
27. (1987 j), ‘Meeting of 7 April 1987 – Note by the Secretariat’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/1, 10 April.
28. (1988 a), ‘Statement by the Delegation of Jamaica’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/W/29, 30 September.
29. (1988 b), ‘Communication from the Delegation of India’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/W/23, 22 June.
30. (1988 c), ‘Communication from the Delegation of Jamaica’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/W/22, 16 May.
31. (1988 d), ‘Communication from the European Community’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/W/20, 22 March.
32. (1988 e), ‘Communication from the Nordic Countries’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/W/17, 28 January.
33. (1988 f), ‘Meeting of 20 and 22 June 1988 – Note by the Secretariat’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/8, 13 July.
34. (1988 g), ‘Meeting of 21–23 March 1988 – Note by the Secretariat’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/6, 15 April.
35. (1989 a), ‘Functioning of the GATT System: Decisions of 12 April 1989’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, L/6490, 12 April.
36. (1989 b), ‘Meeting of 19–20 June 1989 – Note by the Secretariat’, Negotiating Group on Functioning of the GATT System, MTN.GNG/NG14/12, 30 June.
37. (1994), ‘Jamaica – Statement by the Hon. Paul Robertson, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade’, GATT Trade Negotiations Committee, MTN.TNC/MIN(94)/ST/36, 13 April.
38. Ghosh Arunabha (2008), ‘See no Evil, Speak no Evil?: The WTO, the Trade Policy Review Mechanism, and Developing Countries’, D.Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford.
39. (2010), ‘Strengthening WTO Surveillance: Making Transparency Work for Developing Countries’, in Deere-Birkbeck Carolyn (ed.), Making Global Trade Governance Work for Development (forthcoming).
40. Gong Baihua (2005), ‘Shanghai's WTO Affairs Consultation Center: Working Together to Take Advantage of WTO Membership’, in Gallagher Peter, Low Patrick, and Stoler Andrew L. (eds.), Managing the Challenges of WTO Participation: 45 Case Studies, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–177.
41. Independent Evaluation Office of the IMF (2006), An Evaluation of the IMF's Multilateral Surveillance, Washington, DC: IMF.
42. International Monetary Fund (1999), External Evaluation of IMF Surveillance – Report by a Group of Independent Experts, Washington, DC: IMF.
43. Keesing Donald B. (1998), Improving Trade Policy Reviews in the World Trade Organization, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
44. Keohane Robert O. (1983), ‘The Demand for International Regimes’, in Krasner Stephen D. (ed.), International Regimes, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, pp. 141–171.
45. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Keohane Robert O. (1986), ‘Reciprocity in International Relations’, International Organization, 40(1): 1–27.
47. Keohane Robert O. and Martin Lisa L. (1995), ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’, International Security, 20(1): 39–51.
48. Koremenos Barbara, Lipson Charles, and Snidal Duncan (2001), ‘The Rational Design of International Institutions’, International Organization, 55(4): 761–799.
49. Lamy Pascal (2007), ‘Monitoring and Surveillance: The Rising Agenda of the WTO’, Address to Georgetown University Law Centre, Washington, DC, 22 October.
50. Leutwiler Fritz, Bradley Bill, Gyllenhammar Pehr G., de Lacharrière Guy Ladreit, Patel I. G., Simonsen Mario H. and Djojohadikusumo Sumitro (1985), Trade Policies for a Better Future: Proposals for Action, Geneva: GATT.
51. Lombardi Domenico and Woods Ngaire (2008), ‘The Politics of Influence: An Analysis of IMF Surveillance’, Review of International Political Economy, 15(5): 711–735.
52. Mattli Walter (2001), ‘Private Justice in a Global Economy: From Litigation to Arbitration’, International Organization, 55(4): 919–947.
53. Mattli Walter and Woods Ngaire (2009), ‘In Whose Benefit? Explaining Regulatory Change in Global Politics’, in Mattli Walter and Woods Ngaire (eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–71.
54. Mavroidis Petros C. (1991–1992), ‘Surveillance Schemes: The GATT's New Trade Policy Review Mechanism’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 13(2): 374–414.
55. Milgrom Paul, North Douglas, and Weingast Barry R. (1990), ‘The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Medieval Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs’, Economics and Politics 1: 1–23.
56. Mitchell Ronald B. (1994), ‘Regime Design Matters: Intentional Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance’, International Organization, 48(3): 425–458.
57. (1998), ‘Sources of Transparency: Information Systems in International Regimes’, International Studies Quarterly, 42(1): 109–130.
58. Narlikar Amrita (2002), ‘The Politics of Participation: Decision-Making Processes and Developing Countries in the World Trade Organization’, The Round Table, 91(364): 171–185.
59. (2005), The World Trade Organization: A very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Odell John S. (2006), ‘Introduction’, in Odell John S. (ed.), Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–38.
61. Ostrom Elinor (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Qureshi Asif H. (1990), ‘The New GATT Trade Policy Review Mechanism: An Exercise in Transparency Or “Enforcement”?’ Journal of World Trade, 24(3): 147–160.
63. Raustiala Kal (2001), ‘Reporting and Review Institutions in 10 Multilateral Environmental Agreements’, United Nations Environment Programme.
64. (2003–2004), ‘Police Patrols and Fire Alarms in the NAAEC’, Loyola of Los AngelesInternational and Comparative Law Review, 26(3): 389–413.
65. Tomz Michael (2007), Reputation and International Cooperation: Sovereign Debt across Three Centuries, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
66. Victor David G., Raustiala Kal, and Skolnikoff Eugene B. (eds.) (1998), The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
67. Wolfe Robert and Helmer Jesse (2007), ‘Trade Policy Begins at Home: Information and Consultation in the Trade Policy Process’, in Halle Mark and Wolfe Robert (eds.), Process Matters: Sustainable Development and Domestic Trade Transparency, Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development, pp. 1–19.
68. WTO, World Trade Organization (1995), ‘Procedural Improvements to the Trade Policy Review Mechanism – Note by the Chairman’, Trade Policy Review Body, WT/TPR/13, 13 December.
69. (2002), ‘Report to the General Council’, Committee on Trade and Development Special Session, TN/CTD/3, 26 July.