What counts as 'Success'? Hierarchical discourses in a girls' comprehensive school

Discourse

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 105-118

  Benjamin, Shereen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011414971     PISSN: 01596306     EISSN: 14693739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01596300303033     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AlNSCOW, M., 1999. Understanding the Development of Inclusive Schools, London: Falmer Press.
2. ALLAN, J., 1999. Actively Seeking Inclusion: pupils with special needs in mainstream schools, London: Falmer Press.
3. APPLE, M., 1996. Cultural Politics and Education, Buckingham: Open University Press.
4. ARNOT, M., and BARTON, L., 1992. Voicing Concerns: sociological perspectives on contemporary education reforms, Wallingford: Triangle.
5. BALL, SJ., 1997. Good school/bad school: paradox and fabrication. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(3): 317–336.
6. BARTON, L., 1993. “ Labels, markets and inclusive education ”. In Special Education in Britain after Wamock, Edited by: VlSSER, J., and UPTON, G., London: David Fulton.
7. BENJAMIN, S., 2001. Student identity work and the micro/politics of 'special educational needs' in a girls' comprehensive school, University of London Institute of Education. PhD thesis
8. BENJAMIN, S., 2002. The Micropolitics of Inclusive Education: an ethnography, Buckingham: Open University Press.
9. BINES, H., 2000. Inclusive standards? Current developments in policy for special educational needs in England and Wales. Oxford Review of Education, 26: 21–33.
10. BLUNKETT, D., 6 January 2000. Raising Aspirations in the 21st Century: the north of England speech on the ficture of education, 6 January, London: DfEE. http://www.dfee.gov.uk/speeches/06_01_00/04.shtml Date accessed 15/03/01
11. DELHI, K., 1996. Between 'market' and 'state'? Engendering education change in the 1990s. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 17: 363–376.
12. DFEE. 1997a. Excellence for All Children, London: HMSO.
13. DFEE. 1997b. Excellence in Schools, London: HMSO.
14. DFEE. 1999. National Learning Targets for England for 2002, Sudbury: Department for Education and Employment, HMSO.
15. DFEE. 2001. Gender and Achievement: different phases of concern about gender http://www.standards.dfee.gov.uk/genderandachievement/data_1.2.7.html, accessed 18 January 2001
16. HAMILTON, D., 1998. “ The idols of the market place ”. In School Effectiveness for Whom? Challenges to the school effectiveness and school improvement movements, Edited by: SLEE, R., WEINER, G., and TOMLISON, S., London: Falmer.
17. HATCHER, R., 1997. New Labour, school improvement and racial equality. Multicultural Teaching, 15(3): 8–13.
18. HEVEY, D., 1993. “ The tragedy principle: strategies for change in the representation of disabled people ”. In Disabling Barriers-Enabling Environments, Edited by: SWATN, J., FINKELSTEIN, V., FRENCH, S., and OLIVER, M., London: Sage.
19. JOHNSON, R., 1991. “ My New Right education ”. In Education Limited: schooling, training and the New Right since 1979, Edited by: EDUCATION GROUP 2, CULTURAL STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM. London: Unwin Hyman.
20. KENWAY, J., ed. 1995. Marketing Education: some critical issues, Malvern, VIC: Deakin University Press.
21. KENWAY, J., WILLIS, S., BLACKMORE, J., and RENNIE, L., 1997. Answering Back girls, boys and feminism in schools, St Leonards, New South Wales: Alien & Unwin.
22. KUGELMASS, J. W., 2001. Collaboration and compromise in creating and sustaining an inclusive school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 5: 47–65.
23. LEVITAS, R., 1998. The Inclusive Society? Social exclusion and New Labour, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.
24. LINGARD, B., LADWIG, J., and LUKE, A., 1998. “ School effects in postmodern conditions ”. In School Effectiveness for Whom? Challenges to the School Effectiveness and School Improvement Movements, Edited by: SLEE, R., WEFNER, G., and TOMLTNSON, S., London: Falmer.
25. LLOYD, C., 2000. Excellence for all children--false promises! The failure of current policy for inclusive education and implications for the 21st century. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 4: 133–151.
26. LUNT, I., and NORWICH, B., 1999. Can Effective Schools Be Inclusive Schools?, London: Institute of Education.
27. MORLEY, L., and RASSOOL, N., 1999. School Effectiveness: fracturing the discourse, London: Falmer.
28. NACETT. 2000. Aiming Higher: NACETT's report on the National Learning Targets for England and advice on targets beyond 2002, Sudbury: National Advisory Council for Education and Training Targets.
29. NORWICH, B., 1990. “ How an entitlement can become a restraint ”. In Special Educational Needs and the National Curriculum: the impact of the Education Reform Act, Edited by: DANIELS, H., and WARE, J., London: Kogan Page and Institute of Education.
30. RAPHAELREED, L., 1998. “ 'Zero tolerance': gender performance and school failure ”. In Failing Boys? Issues in Gender and Achievement, Edited by: EPSTEIN, D., ELWOOD, J., HEY, V., and MAW, J., Buckingham: Open University Press.
31. SENNETT, R., 1998. The Corrosion of Character: the personal consequences of work in the new capitalism, New York and London: W.W. Norton.
32. SLEE, R., “ High reliability organizations and liability students--the politics of recognition ”. In School Effectiveness for Whom? Challenges to the School Effectiveness and School Improvement Movements, Edited by: SLEE, R., WEINER, G., and TOMLINSON, S., London: Palmer. 998
33. THORNE, B., 1993. Gender Play: girls and boys in school, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
34. TOMLINSON, S., 1982. A Sociology of Special Education, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
35. TOMLINSON, S., ed. 1994. Educational Reform and Its Consequences, London: Rivers Oram Press.