Quality control mechanisms exclude incorrect polymerases from the eukaryotic replication fork

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 675-680

  Schauer, Grant D ^a   O'Donnell, Michael E ^a  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clamp loader; DNA polymerase; PCNA; Replication; Replisome

Indexed keywords

DNA POLYMERASE; REPLICATION FACTOR C; CYCLINE; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE ALPHA; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE GAMMA; MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE PROTEIN; RNA DIRECTED RNA POLYMERASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRAND; EUKARYOTE; GENOME; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENETICS; METABOLISM;

DNA POLYMERASE II; DNA POLYMERASE III; DNA REPLICATION; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE PROTEINS; PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; QUALITY CONTROL; REPLICATION PROTEIN C; RNA REPLICASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 85010710979     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1619748114     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Kornberg A, Baker TA (2005) DNA Replication (University Science Books, Herndon, VA), 2nd Ed.
2. Benkovic SJ, Valentine AM, Salinas F (2001) Replisome-mediated DNA replication. Annu Rev Biochem 70(1):181-208.
3. Stillman B (2008) DNA polymerases at the replication fork in eukaryotes. Mol Cell 30(3):259-260.
4. O'Donnell M, Langston L, Stillman B (2013) Principles and concepts of DNA replication in bacteria, archaea, and eukarya. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5(7):a010108.
5. Moyer SE, Lewis PW, Botchan MR (2006) Isolation of the Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(27):10236-10241.
6. Ilves I, Petojevic T, Pesavento JJ, Botchan MR (2010) Activation of the MCM2-7 helicase by association with Cdc45 and GINS proteins. Mol Cell 37(2):247-258.
7. Makarova KS, Koonin EV, Kelman Z (2012) The CMG (CDC45/RecJ, MCM, GINS) complex is a conserved component of the DNA replication system in all archaea and eukaryotes. Biol Direct 7:7.
8. Yao NY, O'Donnell M (2012) The RFC clamp loader: Structure and function. Subcell Biochem 62:259-279.
9. Georgescu RE, et al. (2014) Mechanism of asymmetric polymerase assembly at the eukaryotic replication fork. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21(8):664-670.
10. Georgescu RE, et al. (2015) Reconstitution of a eukaryotic replisome reveals suppression mechanisms that define leading/lagging strand operation. eLife 4:e04988.
11. Langston LD, et al. (2014) CMG helicase and DNA polymerase ε form a functional 15-subunit holoenzyme for eukaryotic leading-strand DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(43):15390-15395.
12. Chilkova O, et al. (2007) The eukaryotic leading and lagging strand DNA polymerases are loaded onto primer-ends via separate mechanisms but have comparable processivity in the presence of PCNA. Nucleic Acids Res 35(19):6588-6597.
13. Langston LD, O'Donnell M (2008) DNA polymerase δ is highly processive with proliferating cell nuclear antigen and undergoes collision release upon completing DNA. J Biol Chem 283(43):29522-29531.
14. Pursell ZF, Isoz I, Lundström E-B, Johansson E, Kunkel TA (2007) Yeast DNA polymerase epsilon participates in leading-strand DNA replication. Science 317(5834):127-130.
15. Kunkel TA, Burgers PM (2008) Dividing the workload at a eukaryotic replication fork. Trends Cell Biol 18(11):521-527.
16. Nick McElhinny SA, Gordenin DA, Stith CM, Burgers PMJ, Kunkel TA (2008) Division of labor at the eukaryotic replication fork. Mol Cell 30(2):137-144.
17. Miyabe I, Kunkel TA, Carr AM (2011) The major roles of DNA polymerases epsilon and delta at the eukaryotic replication fork are evolutionarily conserved. PLoS Genet 7(12):e1002407, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002407.
18. Yu C, et al. (2014) Strand-specific analysis shows protein binding at replication forks and PCNA unloading from lagging strands when forks stall. Mol Cell 56(4):551-563.
19. Maga G, Stucki M, Spadari S, Hübscher U (2000) DNA polymerase switching: I. Replication factor C displaces DNA polymerase α prior to PCNA loading. J Mol Biol 295(4):791-801.
20. Hingorani MM, Coman MM (2002) On the specificity of interaction between the Saccharomyces cerevisiae clamp loader replication factor C and primed DNA templates during DNA replication. J Biol Chem 277(49):47213-47224.
21. Ghaemmaghami S, et al. (2003) Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425(6959):737-741.
22. Jorgensen P, et al. (2007) The size of the nucleus increases as yeast cells grow. Mol Biol Cell 18(9):3523-3532.
23. Yuzhakov A, Kelman Z, Hurwitz J, O'Donnell M (1999) Multiple competition reactions for RPA order the assembly of the DNA polymerase delta holoenzyme. EMBO J 18(21):6189-6199.
24. Sun J, et al. (2015) The architecture of a eukaryotic replisome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 22(12):976-982.
25. Hedglin M, Pandey B, Benkovic SJ (2016) Stability of the human polymerase δ holoenzyme and its implications in lagging strand DNA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(13):E1777-E1786.
26. O'Donnell ME (1987) Accessory proteins bind a primed template and mediate rapid cycling of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 262(34):16558-16565.
27. Stukenberg PT, Turner J, O'Donnell M (1994) An explanation for lagging strand replication: Polymerase hopping among DNA sliding clamps. Cell 78(5):877-887.
28. O'Donnell ME, Kornberg A (1985) Dynamics of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme of Escherichia coli in replication of a multiprimed template. J Biol Chem 260(23):12875-12883.
29. Stodola JL, Burgers PM (2016) Resolving individual steps of Okazaki-fragment maturation at a millisecond timescale. Nat Struct Mol Biol 23(5):402-408.
30. Sekedat MD, et al. (2010) GINS motion reveals replication fork progression is remarkably uniform throughout the yeast genome. Mol Syst Biol 6:353.
31. Johnson RE, Klassen R, Prakash L, Prakash S (2015) A major role of DNA polymerase δ in replication of both the leading and lagging DNA strands. Mol Cell 59(2):163-175.
32. Dua R, Levy DL, Campbell JL (1999) Analysis of the essential functions of the C-terminal protein/protein interaction domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae pol epsilon and its unexpected ability to support growth in the absence of the DNA polymerase domain. J Biol Chem 274(32):22283-22288.
33. Kesti T, Flick K, Keränen S, Syväoja JE, Wittenberg C (1999) DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic domains are dispensable for DNA replication, DNA repair, and cell viability. Mol Cell 3(5):679-685.
34. Burgers PMJ, Gordenin D, Kunkel TA (2016) Who is leading the replication fork, Pol ε or Pol δ? Mol Cell 61(4):492-493.
35. Tsurimoto T, Melendy T, Stillman B (1990) Sequential initiation of lagging and leading strand synthesis by two different polymerase complexes at the SV40 DNA replication origin. Nature 346(6284):534-539.
36. Zhang D, O'Donnell M (2016) The eukaryotic replication machine. Enzymes 39:191-229.
37. Waga S, Stillman B (1998) The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem 67:721-751.
38. Kumaran S, Kozlov AG, Lohman TM (2006) S. cerevisiae replication protein A (scRPA) binds to single-stranded DNA in multiple salt-dependent modes. Biochemistry (Moscow) 45(39):11958-11973.
39. Ferrari ME, Bujalowski W, Lohman TM (1994) Co-operative binding of Escherichia coli SSB tetramers to single-stranded DNA in the (SSB)35 binding mode. J Mol Biol 236(1):106-123.
40. Netz DJA, et al. (2011) Eukaryotic DNA polymerases require an iron-sulfur cluster for the formation of active complexes. Nat Chem Biol 8(1):125-132.
41. Duhr S, Braun D (2006) Why molecules move along a temperature gradient. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(52):19678-19682.
42. Wang Z-X (1995) An exact mathematical expression for describing competitive binding of two different ligands to a protein molecule. FEBS Lett 360(2):111-114.
43. Wyrick JJ, et al. (2001) Genome-wide distribution of ORC and MCM proteins in S. cerevisiae: High-resolution mapping of replication origins. Science 294(5550):2357-2360.
44. Kulak NA, Pichler G, Paron I, Nagaraj N, Mann M (2014) Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells. Nat Methods 11(3):319-324.