메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 215-231

Group Justification in Science

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 85010088362     PISSN: 17423600     EISSN: 17500117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3366/epi.2010.0204     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (21)

References (31)
  • 2
    • 4344592981 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Individual Beliefs and Collective Beliefs in Science and Philosophy: The Plural Subject and the Polyphonic Subject Accounts
    • Bouvier Alban. 2004. “Individual Beliefs and Collective Beliefs in Science and Philosophy: The Plural Subject and the Polyphonic Subject Accounts.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34(3): 382–407.
    • (2004) Philosophy of the Social Sciences , vol.34 , Issue.3 , pp. 382-407
    • Bouvier, A.1
  • 3
    • 85010685230 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Epistemic Value Theory and Judgment Aggregation
    • Fallis Don. 2005. “Epistemic Value Theory and Judgment Aggregation.” Episteme, A Journal of Social Epistemology 2(1): 39–55.
    • (2005) Episteme, A Journal of Social Epistemology , vol.2 , Issue.1 , pp. 39-55
    • Fallis, D.1
  • 4
    • 36248941867 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Collective Epistemic Goals
    • Fallis Don. 2007. “Collective Epistemic Goals.” Social Epistemology 21(3): 267–80.
    • (2007) Social Epistemology , vol.21 , Issue.3 , pp. 267-280
    • Fallis, D.1
  • 5
    • 0004262394 scopus 로고
    • Princeton: Princeton University Press
    • Gilbert Margaret. 1992. On Social Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • (1992) On Social Facts
    • Gilbert, M.1
  • 7
    • 36248945395 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Collective Belief and Scientific Change
    • a, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
    • Gilbert Margaret. 2000a. “Collective Belief and Scientific Change.” In Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays on Plural Subject Theory, pp. 37–49. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    • (2000) Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays on Plural Subject Theory , pp. 37-49
    • Gilbert, M.1
  • 8
    • 85010125148 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Social Rules: Some Problems with Hart's Account, and an Alternative Proposal
    • b, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
    • Gilbert Margaret. 2000b. “Social Rules: Some Problems with Hart's Account, and an Alternative Proposal.” In Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays on Plural Subject Theory, pp. 71–96. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    • (2000) Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays on Plural Subject Theory , pp. 71-96
    • Gilbert, M.1
  • 9
    • 84937383867 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Belief and Acceptance as Features of Groups
    • Gilbert Margaret. 2002. “Belief and Acceptance as Features of Groups.” Protosociology 16: 35–69.
    • (2002) Protosociology , vol.16 , pp. 35-69
    • Gilbert, M.1
  • 11
    • 85010645173 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Group Knowledge versus Group Rationality: Two Approaches to Social Epistemology
    • Goldman Alvin I. 2004. “Group Knowledge versus Group Rationality: Two Approaches to Social Epistemology.” Episteme, A Journal of Social Epistemology 1(1): 11–22.
    • (2004) Episteme, A Journal of Social Epistemology , vol.1 , Issue.1 , pp. 11-22
    • Goldman, A.I.1
  • 13
    • 36249002712 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On the Possibility of Group Knowledge without Belief
    • Hakli Raul. 2007. “On the Possibility of Group Knowledge without Belief.” Social Epistemology 21(3): 249–66.
    • (2007) Social Epistemology , vol.21 , Issue.3 , pp. 249-266
    • Hakli, R.1
  • 15
  • 16
    • 44349161340 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Group Knowledge and Group Rationality: A Judgment Aggregation Perspective
    • List Christian. 2005. “Group Knowledge and Group Rationality: A Judgment Aggregation Perspective.” Episteme, A Journal of Social Epistemology 2(1): 25–38.
    • (2005) Episteme, A Journal of Social Epistemology , vol.2 , Issue.1 , pp. 25-38
    • List, C.1
  • 18
    • 36248981332 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Introduction to Special Issue of Social Epistemology on ‘Collective Knowledge and Collective Knowers
    • Mathiesen Kay. 2007. “Introduction to Special Issue of Social Epistemology on ‘Collective Knowledge and Collective Knowers.’” Social Epistemology 21(3): 209–16.
    • (2007) Social Epistemology , vol.21 , Issue.3 , pp. 209-216
    • Mathiesen, K.1
  • 19
    • 22544472843 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Groups with Minds of Their Own
    • In Schmitt F. F. (ed.), Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
    • Pettit Philip. 2003. “Groups with Minds of Their Own.” In Schmitt F. F. (ed.), Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality, pp. 167–93. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    • (2003) Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality , pp. 167-193
    • Pettit, P.1
  • 20
    • 36249030871 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The CDF Collaboration and Argumentation Theory: The Role of Process in Objective Knowledge
    • Rehg William and Kent W. Staley. 2008. “The CDF Collaboration and Argumentation Theory: The Role of Process in Objective Knowledge.” Perspectives on Science 16(1): 1–25.
    • (2008) Perspectives on Science , vol.16 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-25
    • Rehg, W.1    Kent, W.S.2
  • 21
    • 44249128656 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Science as Collective Knowledge
    • Rolin Kristina. 2008. “Science as Collective Knowledge.” Cognitive Systems Research 9(1–2): 115–24.
    • (2008) Cognitive Systems Research , vol.9 , Issue.1-2 , pp. 115-124
    • Rolin, K.1
  • 22
    • 56749182769 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Doing Science, Writing Science
    • Schickore Jutta. 2008. “Doing Science, Writing Science.” Philosophy of Science 75(3): 323–43.
    • (2008) Philosophy of Science , vol.75 , Issue.3 , pp. 323-343
    • Schickore, J.1
  • 23
    • 28844439751 scopus 로고
    • The Justification of Group Beliefs
    • In Schmitt F. F. (ed.), Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
    • Schmitt Frederick F. 1994. “The Justification of Group Beliefs.” In Schmitt F. F. (ed.), Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge, pp. 257–87. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    • (1994) Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge , pp. 257-287
    • Schmitt, F.F.1
  • 25
    • 36248953107 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidential Collaborations: Epistemic and Pragmatic Considerations in ‘Group Belief
    • Staley Kent W. 2007. “Evidential Collaborations: Epistemic and Pragmatic Considerations in ‘Group Belief.’” Social Epistemology 21(3): 321–35.
    • (2007) Social Epistemology , vol.21 , Issue.3 , pp. 321-335
    • Staley, K.W.1
  • 27
    • 85044811439 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rejecting Rejectionism
    • Tollefsen Deborah P. 2003. “Rejecting Rejectionism.” Protosociology 18–19: 389–405.
    • (2003) Protosociology , vol.18-19 , pp. 389-405
    • Tollefsen, D.P.1
  • 29
    • 2142685145 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Collective Belief and Acceptance
    • Wray K. Brad. 2001. “Collective Belief and Acceptance.” Synthese 129: 319–33.
    • (2001) Synthese , vol.129 , pp. 319-333
    • Wray, K.B.1
  • 30
    • 33747862663 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific Authorship in the Age of Collaborative Research
    • Wray K. Brad. 2006. “Scientific Authorship in the Age of Collaborative Research.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37: 505–14.
    • (2006) Studies in History and Philosophy of Science , vol.37 , pp. 505-514
    • Wray, K.B.1
  • 31
    • 36248971568 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Who Has Scientific Knowledge?
    • Wray K. Brad. 2007. “Who Has Scientific Knowledge?” Social Epistemology 21(3): 337–47.
    • (2007) Social Epistemology , vol.21 , Issue.3 , pp. 337-347
    • Wray, K.B.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.