Impact and Management Research: Exploring Relationships between Temporality, Dialogue, Reflexivity and Praxis

British Journal of Management

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 3-13

  MacIntosh, Robert ^a   Beech, Nic ^b   Bartunek, Jean ^c   Mason, Katy ^d   Cooke, Bill ^e   Denyer, David ^f  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^c BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^d LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^f CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009814684     PISSN: 10453172     EISSN: 14678551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12207     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Abrahamson, E., H. Berkowitz, and H. Dumez (2016). ‘A more relevant approach to relevance in management studies: an essay on performativity’, Academy of Management Review, 41, pp. 367–381.
2. Adler, N. J. (2015). ‘Finding beauty in a fractured world: art inspires leaders – leaders change the world’, Academy of Management Review, 40, pp. 480–494.
3. Aguinis, H. D. L., E. P. Shapiro, E. P. Antonacopoulou and T. G. Cummings (2014). ‘Scholarly impact: a pluralist conceptualization’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 14, pp. 623–639.
4. Albert, S. and J. M. Bartunek (in press). ‘Composing a musical score for academic−practitioner collaborative research’. In A. Langley and H. Tsoukas (eds), Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
5. Barley, S. (2016). ‘60th Anniversary Issue: Ruminations on how we became a mystery house and how we might get out’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 61, pp. 1–8.
6. Barnes, B. (1983). ‘Social life as bootstrapped induction’, Sociology, 17, pp. 524–545.
7. Bartunek, J. M. (2016). ‘A commentary quiz: what musical composition best describes a primary contribution of your article?’, Management Learning, 47, pp. 100–109.
8. Bartunek, J. M. and S. L. Rynes (2010). ‘The construction and contributions of “implications for practice”: what's in them and what might they offer?’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9, p. 100.
9. Bartunek, J. M. and S. L. Rynes (2014). ‘Academics and practitioners are alike and unalike: the paradoxes of academic−practitioner relationships’, Journal of Management, 40, pp. 1181–1201.
10. Bartunek, J. M. and R. W. Woodman (2015). ‘Beyond Lewin: toward a temporal approximation of organization development and change’, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, pp. 157–182.
11. Beech, N., R. MacIntosh and D. MacLean (2010). ‘Dialogues between academics and practitioners: the role of generative dialogic encounters’, Organization Studies, 31, pp. 1341–1367.
12. Bresnen, M. and G. Burrell (2012). ‘Journals à la mode? Twenty years of living alongside mode 2 and the new production of knowledge’, Organization, 20, pp. 25–37.
13. Callon, M. (1998). The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Creech, A., I. Papageorgi, C. Duffy, F. Morton, E. Hadden, J. Potter, C. de Bezenac, T. Whyton, E. Himonides and G. Welch (2008). ‘Investigating musical performance: commonality and diversity among classical and non-classical musicians’, Music Education Research, 10, pp. 215–234.
15. Czarniawska, B. (1999). Writing Management: Organization Theory as a Literary Genre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Davis, G. F. (2015). ‘Editorial Essay: what is organizational research for?’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, pp. 179–188.
17. Delbridge, R. (2014). ‘Promising futures: CMS, post-disciplinarity and the new public social science’, Journal of Management Studies, 51, pp. 95–117.
18. Fournier, V. and C. Grey (2000). ‘At the critical moment: conditions and prospects for critical management studies’, Human Relations, 53, pp. 7–32.
19. Gabor, E. (2013). ‘Tuning the body of the classical musician’, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 8, pp. 206–223.
20. Haraway, D. (1988). ‘Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14, pp. 575–599.
21. Heusinkveld, S., A. Sturdy and A. Werr (2011). ‘The co-consumption of management ideas and practices’, Management Learning, 42, pp. 139–147.
22. Hibbert, P., R. MacIntosh and C. Coupland (2010). ‘Reflexivity, recursion and relationality in organisational research processes’, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 5, pp. 47–62.
23. Lambert, D. M. and M. G. Enz (2015). ‘We must find the courage to change’, Journal of Business Logistics, 36, pp. 9–17.
24. MacIntosh, R., N. Beech, E. Antonacopoulou and D. Sims (2012). ‘Practising and knowing management: a dialogic perspective’, Management Learning, 43, pp. 373–383.
25. MacIntosh, R., J. M. Bartunek, M. Bhatt and D. MacLean (2016). ‘I never promised you a rose garden: reflections on the evolution of research questions’. In A. B. Shani and D. Mouair (eds), Research in Organizational Change and Development, Vol. 2, pp. 47–82. Bingley UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
26. MacKenzie, D. (2006). An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
27. MacKenzie, D. (2007). ‘Is economics performative?’ In D. A. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa and L. Siu (eds), Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics, Ch. 3, pp. 54–86. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Markides, C. (2011). ‘Crossing the chasm: how to convert relevant research into managerially useful research’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47, pp. 121–134.
29. Mason, K., H. Kjellberg and J. Hagberg (2014). ‘Exploring the performativity of marketing: theories, practices and devices’, Journal of Marketing Management, 31, pp. 1–15.
30. McCloskey, D. (1998). The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
31. Nobel, C. (2016). ‘Why isn't business research more relevant to business practitioners?’, Harvard Business School Working Knowledge, 19 September. http://hbswk.hbs.edu.
32. Patriotta, G. (2016). ‘Cities of noise: a brief inquiry into sensemaking, sensemakers and organized worlds’, Academy of Management Review, 41, pp. 557–570.
33. Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). ‘The double hurdles for management research’. In T. Clark (ed.), Advancement in Organizational Behaviour: Essays in Honour of Derek Pugh. London: Dartmouth Press.
34. Pettigrew, A. M. (2001). ‘Management research after modernism’, British Journal of Management, 12, pp. 61–70.
35. Pettigrew, A. P. (2011). ‘Scholarship with impact’, British Journal of Management, 22, pp. 347–354.
36. Pfeffer, J. and C. T. Fong (2002). ‘The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, pp. 78–95.
37. Romme, A. G. L., M. Avenier, D. Denyer, G. P. Hodgkinson, K. Pandza, K. Starkey and N. Worren (2015). ‘Towards common ground and trading zones in management research and practice’, British Journal of Management, 26, pp. 544–559.
38. Sandelands, L. E. (1990). ‘What is so practical about theory? Lewin revisited’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20, pp. 235–262.
39. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York.
40. Shotter, J. (2010). ‘Situated dialogic action research: disclosing “beginnings” for innovative change in organizations’, Organization Research Methods, 13, pp. 268–285.
41. Styhre, A. (2016). ‘What David Foster Wallace can teach management scholars’, Academy of Management Review, 41, pp. 170–183.
42. Thorpe, R., C. Eden, J. Bessant and P. Ellwood (2011). ‘Rigour, relevance and reward: introducing the knowledge translation value chain’, British Journal of Management, 22, pp. 420–431.
43. Tranfield, D. and K. Starkey (1998). ‘The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: towards policy’, British Journal of Management, 9, pp. 341–353.
44. Wilhelm, H. and S. Bort (2013). ‘How managers talk about their consumption of popular management concepts: identity, rules and situations’, British Journal of Management, 24, pp. 428–444.
45. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.