Practising and knowing management: A dialogic perspective

Management Learning

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 373-383

  MacIntosh, Robert ^a   Beech, Nic ^b   Antonacopoulou, Elena ^c   Sims, David ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^d CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dialogue; knowing; management research; practice; relevance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865063124     PISSN: 13505076     EISSN: 14617307     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1350507612452521     Document Type: Editorial

References (41)

1. Antonacopoulou EPHandbook of New Approaches to Organization Studies. Barry DHansen H, ed. London: SAGE; 2008:112-131.
2. Antonacopoulou EP.Knowledge impact and scholarship: Unlearning and practising to co-create actionable knowledge.Management Learning. 2009;40 (4): 421-430.
3. Antonacopoulou EP.Beyond co-production: Practice-relevant scholarship as a foundation for delivering impact through powerful ideas.Public Money and Management. 2010;30 (4): 219-225.
4. Argyris CThe Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory: Meta Theoretical Perspectives. Tsoukas HKnudsen C, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp; 2004:423-52.
5. Bartunek JM.What has happened to mode?.British Journal of Management. 2011;22 (3): 555-558.
6. Bateson GSteps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1972:.
7. Beech N,MacIntosh R,MacLean D.Dialogues between academics and practitioners: The role of generative dialogic encounters.Organization Studies. 2010;31 (9): 1341-1367.
8. Beech N,Hibbert P,MacIntosh R, et alOrganizational Ethnography: Studying the Complexities of Everyday Life. Ybema SYanow DWels H, ed. London: SAGE; 2009:196-214.
9. Carlile PR.A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development.Organization Science. 2002;13 (4): 442-455.
10. Cook SDN,Brown JS.Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing.Organization Science. 1999;10 (4): 381-400.
11. Corradi G,Gherardi S,Verzelloni L.Through the practice lens.Management Learning. 2010;41 (3): 265-283.
12. Cunliffe AL.Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning.Management Learning. 2002;33 (1): 35-61.
13. Ellis N,Ybema S.Marketing identities: Shifting circles of identification in inter-organizational relationships.Organization Studies. 2010;31 (3): 279-305.
14. Feldman MS,Orlikowski WJ.Theorizing practice and practicing theory.Organization Science. 2011;22 (5): 1240-1253.
15. Guest DE.Don't shoot the messenger: A wake-up call for academics.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50 (5): 1020-1026.
16. Hargadon AB,Bechky BA.When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work.Organization Science. 2006;17 (4): 484-500.
17. Hibbert P,Coupland C,MacIntosh R.Reflexivity: Recursion and relationality in organizational research processes.Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management. 2010;5 (1): 47-62.
18. Isaacs WDialogue and the Art of Thinking Together. New York: Doubleday; 1999:.
19. Jarzabkowski PA,Lê JK,Feldman MS.Toward a theory of coordinating: Creating coordinating mechanisms in practice.Organization Science. 2011 2011;:.
20. Kelemen M,Bansal P.The conventions of management research and their relevance to management practice.British Journal of Management. 2002;13 (2): 97-108.
21. Kempster S,Stewart J.Becoming a leader: A co-produced autoethnographic exploration of situated learning of leadership practice.Management Learning. 2010;41 (2): 205-219.
22. Kieser A,Leiner L.Collaborate with practitioners: But beware of collaborative research.Journal of Management Inquiry. 2012;21 (1): 14-28.
23. Langley A.Strategies for theorizing from process data.Academy of Management Review. 1999;24 (4): 691-710.
24. Markides C.Crossing the chasm: How to convert relevant research into managerially useful research.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2011;47 (1): 121-134.
25. Mintzberg HThe Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper Row; 1973:.
26. Nicolai A,Seidl D.That's relevant! Different forms of practical relevance in management science.Organization Studies. 2010;31 (9/10): 1257-1285.
27. Nicolai A,Schulz A,Göbel M.Between sweet harmony and a clash of cultures: Does a joint academic-practitioner review reconcile rigor and relevance?.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2011;47 (1): 53-75.
28. Nicolini D.Practice as the site of knowing: insights from the field of telemedicine.Organization Science. 2011;22 (3): 602-620.
29. Nicolini D,Gherardi S,Yanow DKnowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach. New York: ME Sharpe; 2003:.
30. Odiorne GS.The management theory jungle and the existential manager.Academy of Management Journal. 1966;9 (1): 109-116.
31. Pettigrew A.Management research after modernism.British Journal of Management. 2001;12 (Special Issue, December): S61-S70.
32. Pfeffer J,Sutton RThe Knowing-Doing Gap. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1999:.
33. Ramsey C.Provocative theory and a scholarship of practice.Management Learning. 2011;42 (5): 469-483.
34. Rynes SL,Bartunek JM,Daft RL.Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics.Academy of Management Journal. 2001;44 (2): 340-355.
35. Shotter J.Knowledge in transition.Management Learning. 2012 2012;:.
36. Sims D,Huxham C,Beech N.On telling stories but hearing snippets: Sense-taking from presentations of practice.Organization. 2009;16 (3): 371-388.
37. Susman GI,Evered RD.An assessment of the scientific merits of action research.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1978;23 (4): 582-603.
38. Swart J.That's why it matters: How knowing creates value.Management Learning. 2011;42 (3): 319-332.
39. Tsoukas H.A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations.Organization Science. 2009;20 (6): 941-957.
40. Weick KE.Gapping the relevance bridge: Fashion meets fundamentals in management research.British Journal of Management. 2001;12 (S1): S71-S75.
41. Whittington R.Completing the practice turn in strategy research.Organization Studies. 2006;27 (5): 613-634.