Journals à la mode? Twenty years of living alongside Mode 2 and the new production of knowledge

Organization

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 25-37

  Bresnen, Mike ^a   Burrell, Gibson ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

knowledge production; Mode 2; patronage; power; rigour relevance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871389637     PISSN: 13505084     EISSN: 14617323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1350508412460992     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bartunek J. M.Academic-practitioner Collaboration Need Not Require Joint or Relevant Research: Toward a Relational Scholarship of Integration.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50 (6): 1323-33.
2. Beech N.,Macxintosh R.,MacLean D.Dialogues Between Academics and Practitioners: The Role of Generative Dialogic Encounters.Organization Studies. 2010;31 (9-10): 1341-67.
3. Bresnen M.,Marshall N.Building Partnerships: Case Studies of Client-contractor Collaboration in the UK Construction Industry.Construction Management and Economics. 2000;18 (7): 819-32.
4. David P.The Historical Origins of Open Science.Capitalism and Society. 2008 3(2).
5. Deleuze G.,Guattari F.A Thousand Plateaus. London: Athlone Press; 1988:.
6. Dillon P.The Last Revolution. London: Jonathan Cape; 2006:.
7. Editorial: Why Neo-disciplinary? Why Now?.Organization. 2003;10 (3): 403-20.
8. Etzkowitz H.,Leydesdorff L.The Future Location of Research and Technology Transfer.Journal of Technology Transfer. 1999;24:111-23.
9. Gibbons M.,Limoges C.,Nowotny H.,Schwartzman S.,Scott P.,Trow M.The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage; 1994:.
10. Godin B.Writing Performative History: The New New Atlantis.Social Studies of Science. 1998;28:465-83.
11. Grey C.Re-imagining Relevance: A Response to Starkey and Madan.British Journal of Management. 2001;12 (Special Issue): S27-S32.
12. Gulati R.Tent Poles, Tribalism and Boundary Spanning: The Rigour-relenave Debate in Management Research.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50:775-82.
13. Hessels L. K.,van Lente H.Re-thinking New Knowledge Production: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda.Research Policy. 2008;37:740-60.
14. Hill C.Reformation to Industrial Revolution: Volume 2 Penguin Economic History of Britain. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1969:.
15. Hodgkinson G. P.,Herriott P.,Andersen N.Re-aligning the Stakeholders in Management Research: Lessons from Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology.British Journal of Management. 2001;12 (Special Issue): S41-S48.
16. Hodgkinson G. P,Rousseau D. M.Bridging the Relevance Gap in Management Research: It's Already Happening!.Journal of Management Studies. 2009;46:534-46.
17. Hodgkinson G. P.,Starkey K.Not Simply Returning to the Same Answer Over and Over Again: Reframing Relevance.British Journal of Management. 2011;22:355-69.
18. Huff A. S.Changes in Organisational Knowledge Production.Academy of Management Review. 2000;25 (2): 288-93.
19. Huff A. S.,Huff J. O.Re-focusing the Business School Agenda.British Journal of Management. 2001;12:S49-S54.
20. Jacob M.The Cultural Meaning of the Scientific Revolution. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1988:.
21. Jarzabkowski P.,Mohrman S. A.,Scherer A.G.Organization Studies as Applied Science: The Generation and Use of Academic Knowledge About Organizations.Organization Studies. 2010;31 (9-10): 1189-207.
22. Jewson N.Medical Knowledge and the Patronage System in 18th Century England.Sociology. 1974;8 (3): 369-85.
23. Jones C.Review of "Women in Science" by R. Watts (2007).Reviews of History (2009)
24. Kieser A.,Leiner L.Why the Rigour-relevance Gap in Management Research is Unbridgeable.Journal of Management Studies. 2009;46:516-33.
25. Landes D.The Wealth and Poverty of Nations. London: WW Norton; 1998:.
26. Learmonth M.,Lockett A.,Dowd K.Promoting Scholarship That Matters: The Uselessness of Useful Research and the Usefulness of Useless Research.British Journal of Management. 2012;23:35-44.
27. Mack P.Elizabethan Rhetoric: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
28. MacLean D.,MacIntosh R.,Grant S.Mode 2 Management Research.British Journal of Management. 2002;13:189-207.
29. Mitev N.,Venters W.Reflexive Evaluation of an Academic-industry Research Collaboration: Can Mode 2 Management Research be Achieved?.Journal of Management Studies. 2009;46 (5): 733-54.
30. Nicolai A.,Seidl D.That's Relevant! Different Forms of Practical Relevance in Management Science.Organization Studies. 2010;31 (9-10): 1257-85.
31. Noordenboos G.Women in Academies of Science.Women's Studies International Forum. 2002;25 (1): 127-37.
32. Nowotny H.,Scott P.,Gibbons M.Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity; 2001:.
33. Nowotny H.,Scott P.,Gibbons M."Mode 2" Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge.Minerva. 2003;41 (3): 179-94.
34. Pettigrew A. M.Management Research After Modernism.British Journal of Management. 2001;12:S61-S70.
35. Ravetz J. R.Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1972:.
36. Reed M. I.Masters of the Universe: Power and Elites in Organization Studies.Organization Studies. 2012;33 (2): 203-221.
37. Rip A.Regional Innovation Systems and the Advent of Strategic Science.Journal of Technology Transfer. 2002;27 (1): 123-31.
38. Rynes S. L.,Giluk T. L.,Brown K.C.The Very Separate World of Academic and Practitioner Publications in Human Resource Management: Implications for Evidence-based Management.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50:987-1008.
39. Schama S.A History of Britain 1603-1776. BBC publication; 2001:.
40. Shattock M.Managing Good Governance in Higher Education. Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 2006:.
41. Starkey K.,Hatchuel A.,Tempest S.Management Research and the New Logics of Discovery and Engagement.Journal of Management Studies. 2009;46:547-58.
42. Starkey K.,Madan P.Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research.British Journal of Management. 2001;12:S3-S26.
43. Swan J.,Bresnen M.,Robertson M.,Newell S.,Dopson S.When Policy Meets Practice-Colliding Logics and the Challenges of "Mode 2" Initiatives in the Translation of Academic Knowledge.Organization Studies. 2010;31 (9-10): 1311-40.
44. Thorpe R.,Eden C.,Bessant J.,Ellwood P.Rigour, Relevance and Reward: Introducing the Knowledge Translation Value Chain.British Journal of Management. 2011;22:420-31.
45. Tranfield D.,Starkey K.The Nature, Social Organization and Promotion of Management Research: Towards Policy.British Journal of Management. 1998;9:341-53.
46. Van de Ven A. H.Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organisational and Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007:.
47. Watts R.Women in Science: A Social and Cultural History. London: Routledge; 2007:.
48. Weingart P.From "Finalization" to "Mode 2": Old Wine in New Bottles?.Social Science Information. 1997;36 (4): 591-613.
49. Ziman J. M.Postacademic Science: Constructing Knowledge with Networks and Norms.Science Studies. 1996;9 (1): 67-80.
50. Ziman J. M.Real Science: What It Is and What It Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000:.