SMITE: An R/Bioconductor package that identifies network modules by integrating genomic and epigenomic information

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Wijetunga, N Ari ^a   Johnston, Andrew D ^a   Maekawa, Ryo ^b   Delahaye, Fabien ^a   Ulahannan, Netha ^a   Kim, Kami ^a   Greally, John M ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b YAMAGUCHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Epigenetic; Gene expression; Genomic; Interaction network; Modules

Indexed keywords

ASSAYS; BIOINFORMATICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; INTEGRATION; SODIUM AZIDE; SPIN GLASS;

BIOLOGICAL INSIGHT; EPIGENETIC; EPIGENETIC REGULATION; GENOMIC; INDEPENDENT VALUES; INTERACTION NETWORKS; MODULES; MULTI DIMENSIONAL;

DATA INTEGRATION;

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ALGORITHM; CYTOLOGY; EPIGENETICS; FIBROBLAST; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; HUMAN; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MALE; METABOLISM; PREPUCE; SOFTWARE; THEORETICAL MODEL; TOXOPLASMA;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, GENETIC; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; EPIGENOMICS; FIBROBLASTS; FORESKIN; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SOFTWARE; TOXOPLASMA; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 85009809651     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-1477-3     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Chin L, Hahn WC, Getz G, Meyerson M. Making sense of cancer genomic data. Genes Dev. 2011;25:534-55.
2. Koestler DC, Jones MJ, Kobor MS. The era of integrative genomics: more data or better methods? Epigenomics. 2014;6:463-7.
3. Feldmann A, Ivanek R, Murr R, Gaidatzis D, Burger L, Schübeler D. Transcription factor occupancy can mediate active turnover of DNA methylation at regulatory regions. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003994.
4. Wang J, Zhuang J, Iyer S, Lin X, Whitfield TW, Greven MC, Pierce BG, Dong X, Kundaje A, Cheng Y, Rando OJ, Birney E, Myers RM, Noble WS, Snyder M, Weng Z. Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors. Genome Res. 2012;22:1798-812.
5. Benveniste D, Sonntag HJ, Sanguinetti G, Sproul D. Transcription factor binding predicts histone modifications in human cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:13367-72.
6. Zilberman D, Gehring M, Tran RK, Ballinger T, Henikoff S. Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation uncovers an interdependence between methylation and transcription. Nat Genet. 2007;39:61-9.
7. Hark AT, Schoenherr CJ, Katz DJ, Ingram RS, Levorse JM, Tilghman SM. CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus. Nature. 2000;405:486-9.
8. Luu PL, Schöler HR, Araúzo-Bravo MJ. Disclosing the crosstalk among DNA methylation, transcription factors, and histone marks in human pluripotent cells through discovery of DNA methylation motifs. Genome Res. 2013;23:2013-29.
9. Hu S, Wan J, Su Y, Song Q, Zeng Y, Nguyen HN, Shin J, Cox E, Rho HS, Woodard C, Xia S, Liu S, Lyu H, Ming GL, Wade H, Song H, Qian J, Zhu H. DNA methylation presents distinct binding sites for human transcription factors. Elife. 2013;2:e00726.
10. Kim J, Kollhoff A, Bergmann A, Stubbs L. Methylation-sensitive binding of transcription factor YY1 to an insulator sequence within the paternally expressed imprinted gene, Peg3. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:233-45.
11. Domcke S, Bardet AF, Adrian Ginno P, Hartl D, Burger L, Schübeler D. Competition between DNA methylation and transcription factors determines binding of NRF1. Nature. 2015;528:575-9.
12. Jiao Y, Widschwendter M, Teschendorff AE. A systems-level integrative framework for genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression data identifies differential gene expression modules under epigenetic control. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2360-6.
13. Ramanan VK, Shen L, Moore JH, Saykin AJ. Pathway analysis of genomic data: concepts, methods, and prospects for future development. Trends Genet. 2012;28:323-32.
14. Mukherjee SN, Skykacek P, Roberts SJ, Gurr SJ. Gene ranking using bootstrapped p-values. SIGKDD Explorations. 2003;5:16-22.
15. Alves G, Yu YK. Accuracy evaluation of the unified P-value from combining correlated p-values. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91225.
16. Zaykin DV, Zhivotovsky LA, Westfall PH, Weir BS. Truncated product method for combining p-values. Genet Epidemiol. 2002;22:170-85.
17. Stouffer S, DeVinney LN, Suchman E. The American Soldier, Adjustment During Army Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1949.
18. Sidak Z. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1967;62:626-33.
19. Fisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; 1932.
20. Vanderkraats ND, Hiken JF, Decker KF, Edwards JR. Discovering high-resolution patterns of differential DNA methylation that correlate with gene expression changes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:6816-27.
21. Jaffe AE, Murakami P, Lee H, Leek JT, Fallin MD, Feinberg AP, Irizarry RA. Bump hunting to identify differentially methylated regions in epigenetic epidemiology studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:200-9.
22. Suzuki M, Jing Q, Lia D, Pascual M, McLellan A, Greally JM. Optimized design and data analysis of tag-based cytosine methylation assays. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R36.
23. Bibikova M, Barnes B, Tsan C, Ho V, Klotzle B, Le JM, Delano D, Zhang L, Schroth GP, Gunderson KL, Fan JB, Shen R. High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics. 2011;98:288-95.
24. Lipták T. On the combination of independent tests. Magyar Tud Akad Mat Kutato Int Közl. 1958;3:171-97.
25. Jones PA. The DNA methylation paradox. Trends Genet. 1999;15:34-7.
26. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15545-50.
27. West J, Beck S, Wang X, Teschendorff AE. An integrative network algorithm identifies age-associated differential methylation interactome hotspots targeting stem-cell differentiation pathways. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1630.
28. Dittrich MT, Klau GW, Rosenwald A, Dandekar T, Müller T. Identifying functional modules in protein-protein interaction networks: an integrated exact approach. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:i223-31.
29. Beisser D, Klau GW, Dandekar T, Müller T, Dittrich MT. BioNet: an R-Package for the functional analysis of biological networks. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1129-30.
30. Reichardt J, Bornholdt S. Statistical mechanics of community detection. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006;74:016110.
31. Yang Z, Algesheimer R, Tessone CJ. A comparative analysis of community detection algorithms on artificial networks. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30750.
32. Deaton AM, Bird A. CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev. 2011;25:1010-22.
33. Hellman A, Chess A. Gene body-specific methylation on the active X chromosome. Science. 2007;315:1141-3.
34. Ball MP, Li JB, Gao Y, Lee JH, LeProust EM, Park IH, Xie B, Daley GQ, Church GM. Targeted and genome-scale strategies reveal gene-body methylation signatures in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:361-8.
35. Suzuki M, Oda M, Ramos MP, Pascual M, Lau K, Stasiek E, Agyiri F, Thompson RF, Glass JL, Jing Q, Sandstrom R, Fazzari MJ, Hansen RS, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, McLellan AS, Greally JM. Late-replicating heterochromatin is characterized by decreased cytosine methylation in the human genome. Genome Res. 2011;21:1833-40.
36. Bougdour A, Durandau E, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Ortet P, Barakat M, Kieffer S, Curt-Varesano A, Curt-Bertini RL, Bastien O, Coute Y, Pelloux H, Hakimi MA. Host cell subversion by Toxoplasma GRA16, an exported dense granule protein that targets the host cell nucleus and alters gene expression. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13:489-500.
37. Molestina RE, El-Guendy N, Sinai AP. Infection with Toxoplasma gondii results in dysregulation of the host cell cycle. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10:1153-65.
38. Brunet J, Pfaff AW, Abidi A, Unoki M, Nakamura Y, Guinard M, Klein JP, Candolfi E, Mousli M. Toxoplasma gondii exploits UHRF1 and induces host cell cycle arrest at G2 to enable its proliferation. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10:908-20.
39. Blader IJ, Koshy AA. Toxoplasma gondii development of its replicative niche: in its host cell and beyond. Eukaryot Cell. 2014;13:965-76.
40. Kim L, Butcher BA, Denkers EY. Toxoplasma gondii interferes with lipopolysaccharide-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by mechanisms distinct from endotoxin tolerance. J Immunol. 2004;172:3003-10.
41. Valère A, Garnotel R, Villena I, Guenounou M, Pinon JM, Aubert D. Activation of the cellular mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways ERK, P38 and JNK during Toxoplasma gondii invasion. Parasite. 2003;10:59-64.
42. Braun L, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Yogavel M, Curt-Varesano A, Curt-Bertini RL, Hussain T, Kieffer-Jaquinod S, Coute Y, Pelloux H, Tardieux I, Sharma A, Belrhali H, Bougdour A, Hakimi MA. A Toxoplasma dense granule protein, GRA24, modulates the early immune response to infection by promoting a direct and sustained host p38 MAPK activation. J Exp Med. 2013;210:2071-86.
43. Thomas JG, Olson JM, Tapscott SJ, Zhao LP. An efficient and robust statistical modeling approach to discover differentially expressed genes using genomic expression profiles. Genome Res. 2001;11:1227-36.