Understanding Chinese university student conceptions of assessment: cultural similarities and jurisdictional differences between Hong Kong and China

Social Psychology of Education

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 151-173

  Brown, Gavin T L ^a   Wang, Zhenlin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Assessment; Attitudes and beliefs; Chinese; Higher education; Students; Survey research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944691513     PISSN: 13812890     EISSN: 15731928     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11218-015-9322-x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Auyeung, L. H. (2004). Building a collaborative online learning community: A case study in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Computing Research,31(2), 119–136.
2. Berry, R. (2011). Assessment trends in Hong Kong: Seeking to establish formative assessment in an examination culture. Assessment in Education: Policy, Principles and Practice,18(2), 199–211.
3. Biggs, J. (1998). The assessment scene in Hong Kong. In P. Stimpson & P. Morris (Eds.), Curriculum and assessment for Hong Kong: Two components, one system (pp. 315–324). Hong Kong: Open University of Hong Kong Press.
4. Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Measuring attitude with positively packed self-report ratings: Comparison of agreement and frequency scales. Psychological Reports,94(3), 1015–1024. doi:10.2466/pr0.94.3.1015-1024.
5. Brown, G. T. L. (2011). Self-regulation of assessment beliefs and attitudes: A review of the Students’ Conceptions of Assessment inventory. Educational Psychology,31(6), 731–748. doi:10.1080/01443410.2011.599836.
6. Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Student conceptions of assessment across cultural and contextual differences: University student perspectives of assessment from Brazil, China, Hong Kong, and New Zealand. In G. A. D. Liem & A. B. I. Bernardo (Eds.), Advancing Cross-cultural Perspectives on Educational Psychology: A Festschrift for Dennis McInerney (pp. 143–167). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
7. Brown, G. T. L., & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2008). Students’ conceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice,15(1), 3–17. doi:10.1080/09695940701876003.
8. Brown, G. T. L., Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2009). Beliefs that make a difference: Adaptive and maladaptive self-regulation in students’ conceptions of assessment. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 159–186). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
9. Brown, G. T. L., & Wang, Z. (2013). Illustrating assessment: How Hong Kong university students conceive of the purposes of assessment. Studies in Higher Education,38(7), 1037–1057. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.616955.
10. Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-Heritage settings. London: Routledge.
11. Chan, C. K. K., & Rao, N. (Eds.). (2009). Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education. Hong Kong: Springer/The University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre.
12. Chen, J. (2015). Teachers’ conceptions of approaches to teaching: A Chinese perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,24(2), 341–351. doi:10.1007/s40299-014-0184-3.
13. Cheung, T. K.-Y. (2008). An assessment blueprint in curriculum reform. Journal of Quality School Education,5, 23–37.
14. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling,9(2), 233–255.
15. China Civilisation Centre. (2007). China: Five thousand years of history and civilization. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
16. Choi, C.-C. (1999). Public Examinations in Hong Kong. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,6(3), 405–417.
17. Courtney, M. G. R. (2013). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: Using the SPSS R-Menu v20 to make more judicious estimations. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation,18(8), 1–14.
18. Davey, G., De Lian, C., & Higgins, L. (2007). The university entrance examination system in China. Journal of Further and Higher Education,31(4), 385–396. doi:10.1080/03098770701625761.
19. Deneen, C. C., Brown, G. T. L., Shroff, R. H., & Bond, T. G. (2013). Telling the difference: A first evaluation of an outcome-based learning innovation in teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,41(4), 441–456. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2013.787392.
20. Ecclestone, K., & Pryor, J. (2003). ‘Learning careers’ or ‘Assessment careers’? The impact of assessment systems on learning. British Educational Research Journal,29(4), 471–488.
21. Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling,12(3), 343–367.
22. Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research,42(3), 509–529.
23. Feng, Y. (1995). From the imperial examination to the national college entrance examination: The dynamics of political centralism in China’s educational enterprise. Journal of Contemporary China,4(8), 28–56.
24. Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. D. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
25. Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (Vol. 2, pp. 471–499). Washington, DC: APA.
26. Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain: Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27. Gao, M. (2009). Students’ voices in school-based assessment of Hong Kong: A case study. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 107–130). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
28. Gao, L., & Watkins, D. A. (2001). Towards a model of teaching conceptions of Chinese secondary school teachers of physics. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 27–45). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre.
29. Guo, F., & Shi, J. (2014). The relationship between classroom assessment and undergraduates’ learning within Chinese higher education system. Studies in Higher Education, (ahead-of-print), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.942274.
30. Han, M., & Yang, X. (2001). Educational assessment in China: Lessons from history and future prospects. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,8(1), 5–10.
31. Hau, K. T., & Ho, I. T. (2008). Editorial: Insights from research on Asian students’ achievement motivation. International Journal of Psychology,43(5), 865–869.
32. Ho, D. Y. F. (1986). Chinese patterns of socialization: A critical review. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 1–37). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
33. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,6(1), 1–55.
34. IBM. (2011). Amos 20 [computer program] (Version Build 817). Meadville, PA: Amos Development Corporation.
35. Jackson, J. (2005). An inter-university, cross-disciplinary analysis of business education: Perceptions of business faculty in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes,24(3), 293–306. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.004.
36. Klockars, A. J., & Yamagishi, M. (1988). The influence of labels and positions in rating scales. Journal of Educational Measurement,25(2), 85–96.
37. Koo, R. D., Kam, M. C., & Choi, B. C. (2003). Education and schooling in Hong Kong under one country, two systems. Childhood Education,79(3), 137–144.
38. Lam, T. C. M., & Klockars, A. J. (1982). Anchor point effects on the equivalence of questionnaire items. Journal of Educational Measurement,19(4), 317–322.
39. Lee, W. O. (1996). The cultural context for Chinese learners: Conceptions of learning in the Confucian tradition. In D. Watkins & J. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 25–42). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre and Australian Council for Educational Research.
40. Li, L. K. Y. (2001). Some Refinements on Peer Assessment of Group Projects. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,26(1), 5–18. doi:10.1080/0260293002002255.
41. Li, J. (2009). Learning to self-perfect: Chinese beliefs about learning. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education (pp. 35–69). Hong Kong: Springer/The University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre.
42. Liu, P., & Qi, C. (2005). Reform in the curriculum of Basic Education in the People’s Republic of China: Pedagogy, application, and learners. International Journal of Educational Reform,14(1), 35–44.
43. Martin, A. J., Yu, K., & Hau, K. T. (2014). Motivation and engagement in the ‘Asian Century’: a comparison of Chinese students in Australia, Hong Kong, and Mainland China. Educational Psychology,34(4), 417–439.
44. Ngan, M. Y., Lee, J. C. K., & Brown, G. T. L. (2010). Hong Kong principals’ perceptions on changes in evaluation and assessment policies: They’re not for learning. Asian Journal of Educational Research and Synergy,2(1), 36–46.
45. OECD. (2011). Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. Paris, FR: OECD Publishing.
46. Paul, A. M. (2011). The roar of the Tiger Mom. Time (Asia),177(4), 24–30.
47. Peterson, E. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Hamilton, R. J. (2013). Cultural differences in tertiary students’ conceptions of learning as a duty and student achievement. The International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education,1(2), 167–181. doi:10.1504/IJQRE.2013.056462.
48. Pong, W. Y., & Chow, J. C. S. (2002). On the pedagogy of examinations in Hong Kong. Teaching & Teacher Education,18(2), 139–149.
49. Postiglione, G. A., & Leung, J. Y. (1992). Education and Society in Hong Kong. Toward One Country and Two Systems. Hong Kong, SAR: Hong Kong University Press.
50. PRC Ministry of Education. (2005). The guidance on reforming the high school and university entrance examination in experimental zone in Basic Education Curriculum Reform. Beijing, PRC: Ministry of Education.
51. PRC Ministry of Education. (2010). All levels of education gross enrollment rate. In: Educational Statistics in 2009, Ministry of Education, Government of China. Retrieved from http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s4959/201012/113470.html (Accessed 8 Sep. 2011).
52. Qian, D. D. (2014). School-based English language assessment as a high-stakes examination component in Hong Kong: Insights of frontline assessors. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,21(3), 251–270. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.915207.
53. Rieskamp, J., & Reimer, T. (2007). Ecological rationality. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Social Psychology (pp. 273–275). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Salili, F. (2001). Teacher-student interaction: Attributional implications and effectiveness of teachers’ evaluative feedback. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 77–98). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre.
55. Salili, F., Lai, M. K., & Leung, S. S. K. (2004). The consequences of pressure on adolescent students to perform well in school. Hong Kong Journal of Paediatrics,9(4), 329–336.
56. Tsui, A. B. M., & Wong, J. L. N. (2009). In search of a third space: Teacher development in mainland China. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education (pp. 281–311). Hong Kong: Springer/The University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre.
57. United Nations Statistics Division. (2013, December). GDP and its breakdown at current prices in US Dollars. Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/dnllist.asp.
58. Wang, G. (1996). Educational assessment in China. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,3(1), 75–88.
59. Wang, X. B. (2006). An introduction to the system and culture of the College Entrance Examination of China (RN-28). New York: The College Board, Office of Research and Analysis.
60. Wang, L. (2011). Social exclusion and inequality in higher education in China: A capability perspective. International Journal of Educational Development,31(3), 277–286. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.08.002.
61. Wang, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2014). Hong Kong tertiary students’ conceptions of assessment of academic ability. Higher Education Research & Development,33(5), 1063–1077. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.890565.
62. Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.
63. Wise, S. L., & Cotten, M. R. (2009). Test-taking effort and score validity: The influence of the students’ conceptions of assessment. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 187–205). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
64. Wu, X. (2015, January 24–25). Makeit easy for workers to get pay on time. China Daily, p. 5.
65. Yan, P. W., & Chow, J. C. S. (2002). On the pedagogy of examinations in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education,18(3), 139–149.
66. Yu, C.-Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles.
67. Yu, A. B., & Yang, K. S. (1994). The nature of achievement motivation in collectivist societies. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 239–250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68. Zilberberg, A., Finney, S. J., Marsh, K. R., & Anderson, R. D. (2014). The role of students’ attitudes and test-taking motivation on the validity of college institutional accountability tests: A path analytic model. International Journal of Testing,14(4), 360–384. doi:10.1080/15305058.2014.928301.