Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals local fish communities in a species-rich coastal sea

Scientific Reports

Volumn 7, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Yamamoto, Satoshi ^a   Masuda, Reiji ^b   Sato, Yukuto ^c   Sado, Tetsuya ^d   Araki, Hitoshi ^e   Kondoh, Michio ^f   Minamoto, Toshifumi ^a   Miya, Masaki ^d  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM AND INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^e HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f RYUKOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; WATER;

ANIMAL; BAY; BIODIVERSITY; DNA BARCODING; DNA SEQUENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FISH; FISHERY; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; JAPAN; PROCEDURES; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BAYS; BIODIVERSITY; DNA; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FISHERIES; FISHES; GEOGRAPHY; JAPAN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; WATER;

EID: 85009471219     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep40368     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Nelson, J. S. Fishes of the world 4th edn, 1-601 (Wiley, 2006
2. Eschmeyer, W. N., Fricke, R., Fong, J. D., & Polack, D. A. Marine fish diversity: history of knowledge and discovery (Pisces). Zootaxa 2525, 19-50 (2010
3. Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., & Myers, R. A. The completeness of taxonomic inventories for describing the global diversity and distribution of marine fishes. P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 275, 149-155 (2008
4. Costello, M. J., Wilson, S., & Houlding, B. Predicting total global species richness using rates of species description and estimates of taxonomic effort. Syst. Biol. 61, 871-883 (2012
5. Morato, T., Hoyle, S. D., Allain, V., & Nicol, S. J. Seamounts are hotspots of pelagic biodiversity in the open ocean. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9707-9711 (2010
6. Stuart-Smith, R. D. et al. Integrating abundance and functional traits reveals new global hotspots of fish diversity. Nature 501, 539-542 (2013
7. Worm, B., & Tittensor, D. P. Range contraction in large pelagic predators. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11942-11947 (2011
8. Pusceddu, A. et al. Chronic and intensive bottom trawling impairs deep-sea biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8861-8866 (2014
9. Myers, R. A., & Worm, B. Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature 423, 280-283 (2003
10. Frank, K. T., Petrie, B., Choi, J. S., & Leggett, W. C. Trophic cascades in a formerly cod-dominated ecosystem. Science 308, 1621-1623 (2005
11. Genner, M. J. et al. Regional climatic warming drives long-Term community changes of British marine fish. P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Bio. 271, 655-661 (2004
12. Valentini, A., Pompanon, F., & Taberlet, P. DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 110-117 (2009
13. Pompanon, F. et al. Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1931-1950 (2012
14. Bohmann, K. et al. Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 358-367 (2014
15. Thomsen, P. F., & Willerslev, E. Environmental DNA-An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 183, 4-18 (2015
16. Ficetola, G. F., Miaud, C., Pompanon, F., & Taberlet, P. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol. Lett. 4, 423-425 (2008
17. Rees, H. C., Gough, K. C., Middleditch, D. J., Patmore, J. R. M., & Maddison, B. C. Applications and limitations of measuring environmental DNA as indicators of the presence of aquatic animals. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 827-831 (2015
18. Thomsen, P. F. et al. Detection of a diverse marine fish fauna using environmental DNA from seawater samples. PLOS ONE 7, e41732 (2012
19. Pilliod, D. S., Goldberg, C. S., Arkle, R. S., Waits, L. P., & Richardson, J. Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 70, 1123-1130 (2013
20. Janosik, A. M., & Johnston, C. E. Environmental DNA as an effective tool for detection of imperiled fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish. 98, 1889-1893 (2015
21. Huver, J. R., Koprivnikar, J., Johnson, P. T. J., & Whyard, S. Development and application of an eDNA method to detect and quantify a pathogenic parasite in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 25, 991-1002 (2015
22. Spear, S. F., Groves, J. D., Williams, L. A., & Waits, L. P. Using environmental DNA methods to improve detectability in a hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) monitoring program. Biol. Conserv. 183, 38-45 (2015
23. Fukumoto, S., Ushimaru, A., & Minamoto, T. A basin-scale application of environmental DNA assessment for rare endemic species and closely related exotic species in rivers: a case study of giant salamanders in Japan. J Appl. Ecol. 52, 358-365 (2015
24. Laramie, M. B., Pilliod, D. S., & Goldberg, C. S. Characterizing the distribution of an endangered salmonid using environmental DNA analysis. Biol. Conserv. 183, 29-37 (2015
25. Takahara, T., Minamoto, T., & Doi, H. Using environmental DNA to estimate the distribution of an invasive fish species in ponds. PLOS ONE 8, e56584 (2013
26. Nathan, L. M., Simmons, M., Wegleitner, B. J., Jerde, C. L., & Mahon, A. R. Quantifying environmental DNA signals for aquatic invasive species across multiple detection platforms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 12800-12806 (2014
27. Fujiwara, A., Matsuhashi, S., Doi, H., Yamamoto, S., & Minamoto, T. Use of environmental DNA to survey the distribution of an invasive submerged plant in ponds. Freshwater Sci. 35, 748-754 (2016
28. Minamoto, T., Yamanaka, H., Takahara, T., Honjo, M. N., & Kawabata, Z. Surveillance of fish species composition using environmental DNA. Limnology 13, 193-197 (2012
29. Deiner, K., Fronhofer, E. A., Mächler, E., Walser, J. C., & Altermatt, F. Environmental DNA reveals that rivers are conveyer belts of biodiversity information. Nature Communications 7, 12544 (2016
30. Handley, L. L. How will the ?molecular revolution? contribute to biological recording?. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 115, 750-766 (2015
31. Barnes, M. A., & Turner, C. R. The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics. Conserv. Genet. 17, 1-17 (2016
32. Kelly, R. P., Port, J. A., Yamahara, K. M., & Crowder, L. B. Using environmental DNA to census marine fishes in a large mesocosm. PLOS ONE 9, e86175 (2014
33. Miya, M. et al. MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species. Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 2, 150088 (2015
34. Valentini, A. et al. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. 25, 929-942 (2016
35. Port, J. A. et al. Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA. Mol. Ecol. 25, 527-541 (2016
36. Shaw, J. L. A. et al. Comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and conventional fish survey methods in a river system. Biol. Conserv. 197, 131-138 (2016
37. Yamamoto, S. et al. Environmental DNA as a ?snapshot? of fish distribution: A case study of Japanese jack mackerel in Maizuru Bay, Sea of Japan. PLOS ONE 11, e0149786 (2016
38. Wada, T., Haraguchi, H., & Yamasaki, E. Fish fauna and seasonal variation of subtidal fish assemblages in Uradome coast, locating at southwestern Sea of Japan, Honshu, Japan. Bull. Tottori Pref. Mus. 51, 43-58 (2014
39. Wada, T., Osada, N., Haraguchi, H., & Uno, M. A report of fishes and marine invertebrates occurred in the surf zones of sandy beaches at eastern part of Tottori Prefecture, Honshu, Japan. Bull. Tottori Pref. Mus. 51, 23-41 (2014
40. Ficetola, G. F. et al. Replication levels, false presences, and the estimation of presence/absence from eDNA metabarcoding data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15, 543-556 (2015
41. Roussel, J.-M., Paillisson, J.-M., Tréguier, A., & Petit, E. The downside of eDNA as a survey tool in water bodies. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 823-826 (2015
42. Hamady, M., Walker, J. J., Harris, J. K., Gold, N. J., & Knight, R. Error-correcting barcoded primers for pyrosequencing hundreds of samples in multiplex. Nat. Methods 5, 235-237 (2008
43. Andrews, S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available at: http: //www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac. uk/projects/fastqc/ (Accessed: 21st April 2016) (2010
44. Magoč, T., & Salzberg, S. L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957-2963 (2011
45. Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C., & Knight, R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194-2200 (2011
46. Schmieder, R., Lim, Y. W., Rohwer, F., & Edwards, R. TagCleaner: Identification and removal of tag sequences from genomic and metagenomic datasets. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 341 (2010
47. Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+ : architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 421 (2009
48. Iwasaki, W. et al. MitoFish and MitoAnnotator: a mitochondrial genome database of fish with an accurate and automatic annotation pipeline. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2531-2540 (2013
49. R core team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015
50. Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. Available at: http: //CRAN.R-project.org/package= vegan (Accessed: 9th January 2014) (2013
51. Chao, A. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat. 11, 265-270 (1984
52. Masuda, R. Seasonal and interannual variation of subtidal fish assemblages in Wakasa Bay with reference to the warming trend in the Sea of Japan. Environ. Biol. Fish. 82, 387-399 (2008
53. Masuda, R. et al. Fish assemblages associated with three types of artificial reefs: density of assemblages and possible impacts on adjacent fish abundance. Fish. B-NOAA 108, 162-173 (2010