Environmental DNA as a 'snapshot' of fish distribution: A case study of Japanese jack mackerel in Maizuru Bay, Sea of Japan

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Yamamoto, Satoshi ^a   Minami, Kenji ^b   Fukaya, Keiichi ^c   Takahashi, Kohji ^d   Sawada, Hideki ^d   Murakami, Hiroaki ^d   Tsuji, Satsuki ^e   Hashizume, Hiroki ^a   Kubonaga, Shou ^b   Horiuchi, Tomoya ^d   Hongo, Masamichi ^e   Nishida, Jo ^e   Okugawa, Yuta ^e   Fujiwara, Ayaka ^a   Fukuda, Miho ^a   Hidaka, Shunsuke ^a   Suzuki, Keita W ^d   Miya, Masaki ^f   Araki, Hitoshi ^b   Yamanaka, Hiroki ^e   Maruyama, Atsushi ^e   Miyashita, Kazushi ^b   Masuda, Reiji ^d   Minamoto, Toshifumi ^a   Kondoh, Michio ^e   more..

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS   (Japan)

^d KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e RYUKOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM AND INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CASE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DEGRADATION; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA EXTRACTION; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA SYNTHESIS; FISH; GENE DOSAGE; JAPAN; NONHUMAN; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; TRACHURUS JAPONICUS; ANIMAL; BAY; ECOSYSTEM; GENETICS; PERCIFORMES;

ANIMALS; BAYS; BIOMASS; DNA; ECOSYSTEM; JAPAN; PERCIFORMES;

EID: 84960929379     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149786     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bhat A, Magurran AE. Does disturbance affect the structure of tropical fish assemblages? A test using null models. J Fish Biol. 2007; 70: 623-629.
2. Fernandes R, Gomes LC, Pelicice FM, Agostinho AA. Temporal organization of fish assemblages in floodplain lagoons: the role of hydrological connectivity. Environ Biol Fish. 2009; 85: 99-108. doi: 10.1007/s10641-009-9466-7
3. Comeau L, Campana SE, Chouinard GA. Timing of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) seasonal migrations in the southern Gulf of St Lawrence: interannual variability and proximate control. ICES J Mar Sci. 2002; 59: 333-351. doi: 10.1006/jmsc.2001.1153
4. Brönmark C, Skov C, Brodersen J, Nilsson PA, Hansson L-A. Seasonal migration determined by a trade-off between predator avoidance and growth. PLOS ONE. 2008; 3: e1957. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0001957 PMID: 18414660
5. Forsyth DM, Koehn JD, MacKenzie DI, Stuart IG. Population dynamics of invading freshwater fish: common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Biol Invasions. 2012; 15: 341-354. doi: 10.1007/s10530-012-0290-1
6. Matsuzaki S-IS, Takamura N, Arayama K, Tominaga A, Iwasaki J, Washitani I. Potential impacts of non-native channel catfish on commercially important species in a Japanese lake, as inferred from long-term monitoring data. Aquatic Conserv. 2011; 21: 348-357. doi: 10.1002/aqc.1198
7. Attrill MJ, Power M. Climatic influence on a marine fish assemblage. Nature. 2002; 417: 275-278. doi: 10.1038/417275a PMID: 12015600
8. Mumby PJ, Edwards AJ, Arias-González JE, Lindeman KC, Blackwell PG, Gall A, et al. Mangroves enhance the biomass of coral reef fish communities in the Caribbean. Nature. 2004; 427: 533-536. doi: 10.1038/nature02286 PMID: 14765193
9. Brock RE. A critique of the visual census method for assessing coral reef fish populations. B Mar Sci. 1982; 32: 269-276.
10. Willis TJ. Visual census methods underestimate density and diversity of cryptic reef fishes. J Fish Biol. 2001; 59: 1408-1411. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb00202.x
11. Ward-Paige C, Mills Flemming J, Lotze HK. Overestimating fish counts by non-instantaneous visual censuses: consequences for population and community descriptions. PLOS ONE. 2010; 5: e11722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011722 PMID: 20661304
12. Dickens LC, Goatley CHR, Tanner JK, Bellwood DR. Quantifying relative diver effects in underwater visual censuses. PLOS ONE. 2011; 6: e18965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018965 PMID: 21533039
13. Thomsen PF, Kielgast J, Iversen LL, Møller PR, Rasmussen M, Willerslev E. Detection of a diverse marine fish fauna using environmental DNA from seawater samples. PLOS ONE. 2012; 7: e41732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041732 PMID: 22952584
14. Kelly RP, Port JA, Yamahara KM, Martone RG, Lowell N, Thomsen PF, et al. Environmental monitoring. Harnessing DNA to improve environmental management. Science. 2014; 344: 1455-1456. doi: 10.1126/science.1251156 PMID: 24970068
15. Takahara T, Minamoto T, Doi H. Using environmental DNA to estimate the distribution of an invasive fish species in ponds. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8: e56584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056584 PMID: 23437177
16. Deiner K, Walser JC, Mächler E, Altermatt F. Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA. Biol Conserv. 2015; 183: 53-63. doi: 10.1016/j. biocon.2014.11.018
17. Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol Lett. 2008; 4: 423-425.
18. Thomsen P, Kielgast J, Iversen LL, Wiuf C, Rasmussen M, Gilbert MTP, et al. Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. Mol Ecol. 2012; 21: 2565-2573. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05418.x PMID: 22151771
19. Pilliod DS, Goldberg CS, Arkle RS, Waits LP, Richardson J. Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2013; 70: 1123-1130. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2013-0047
20. Rees HC, Bishop K, Middleditch DJ, Patmore JRM, Maddison BC, Gough KC. The application of eDNA for monitoring of the Great Crested Newt in the UK. Ecol Evol. 2014; 4: 4023-4032. doi: 10.1002/ece3. 1272 PMID: 25505530
21. Fukumoto S, Ushimaru A, Minamoto T. A basin-scale application of environmental DNA assessment for rare endemic species and closely related exotic species in rivers: a case study of giant salamanders in Japan. J Appl Ecol. 2015; 52: 358-365. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12392
22. Piaggio AJ, Engeman RM, Hopken MW, Humphrey JS, Keacher KL, Bruce WE, et al. Detecting an elusive invasive species: a diagnostic PCR to detect Burmese python in Florida waters and an assessment of persistence of environmental DNA. Mol Ecol Res. 2013; 14: 374-380. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998. 12180
23. Takahara T, Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Doi H, Kawabata Z. Estimation of fish biomass using environmental DNA. PLOS ONE. 2012; 7: e35868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035868 PMID: 22563411
24. Eichmiller JJ, Bajer PG, Sorensen PW. The relationship between the distribution of common carp and their environmental DNA in a small lake. PLOS ONE. 2014; 9: e112611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0112611 PMID: 25383965
25. Miwa H, Ikeno H. Three dimensional analysis of flow field and water environment in Maizuru Bay with consideration of density distribution. B Maizuru Natl Coll Tec. 2007; 42: 47-58.
26. Masuda R. Seasonal and interannual variation of subtidal fish assemblages in Wakasa Bay with reference to the warming trend in the Sea of Japan. Environ Biol Fish. 2008; 82: 387-399. doi: 10.1007/s10641-007-9300-z
27. Masuda R, Yamashita Y, Matsuyama M. Jack mackerel Trachurus japonicus juveniles use jellyfish for predator avoidance and as a prey collector. Fisheries Sci. 2008; 74: 276-284. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-2906.2008.01522.x
28. Masuda R, Shiba M, Yamashita Y, Ueno M. Fish assemblages associated with three types of artificial reefs: density of assemblages and possible impacts on adjacent fish abundance. Fishery B-NOAA. 2010; 108: 162-173.
29. Ito Y, Yasuma H, Masuda R, Minami K, Matsukura R, Morioka S, et al. Swimming angle and target strength of larval Japanese anchovy (Engraulis japonicus). Fish Sci. 2011; 77: 161-167. doi: 10.1007/s12562-011-0323-1
30. Simmonds J, MacLennan D. Fisheries acoustics: Theory and practice. 2nd ed, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2005.
31. Nakamura T, Hamano A, Abe K, Yasuma H, Miyashita K. Acoustic scattering properties of juvenile jack mackerel Trachurus japonicus based on a scattering model and ex situ target strength measurements. Nippon Suisan Gakkai. 2013; 79: 345-354.
32. Ona E, Mitson RB. Acoustic sampling and signal processing near the seabed: the deadzone revisited. ICES J Mar Sci. 1996; 53: 677-690. doi: 10.1006/jmsc.1996.0087
33. Miya M, Sato Y, Fukunaga T, Sado T, Poulsen JY, Sato K, et al. MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species. R Soc Open Sci. 2015; 2: 150088. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150088 PMID: 26587265
34. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015. Available: http://www.R-project.org/
35. Doi H, Uchii K, Takahara T, Matsuhashi S, Yamanaka H, Minamoto T. Use of droplet digital PCR for estimation of fish abundance and biomass in environmental DNA surveys. PLOS ONE. 2015; 10: e0122763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122763 PMID: 25799582
36. Dejean T, Valentini A, Duparc A, Pellier-Cuit S. Persistence of environmental DNA in freshwater ecosystems. PLOS ONE. 2011; 6: e23398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023398.g001 PMID: 21858099
37. Goldberg CS, Sepulveda A, Ray A, Baumgardt J. Environmental DNA as a new method for early detection of New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Freshwater Sci. 2013; 32: 792-800. doi: 10.1899/13-046.1
38. Deiner K, Altermatt F. Transport distance of invertebrate environmental DNA in a natural river. PLOS ONE. 2014; 9: e88786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088786 PMID: 24523940
39. Barnes MA, Turner CR, Jerde CL, Renshaw MA, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM. Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems. Environ Sci Tec. 2014; 48: 1819-1827. doi: 10.1021/es404734p
40. Maruyama A, Nakamura K, Yamanaka H, Kondoh M, Minamoto T. The release rate of environmental DNA from juvenile and adult fish. PLOS ONE. 2014; 9: e114639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114639 PMID: 25479160
41. Jane SF, Wilcox TM, McKelvey KS, Young MK, Schwartz MK, Lowe WH, et al. Distance, flow and PCR inhibition: eDNA dynamics in two headwater streams. Mol Ecol Res. 2014; 15: 216-227. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12285
42. Sato T, Hagiwara H, Kitazawa K, Shiraki Y, Shibaki Y. Spreading of oceanic materials with secondary undulations of tide. J Jpn Soc Civil Eng. 2012; 68: I-1025-I-1030.
43. Port JA, O'Donnell JL, Romero-Maraccini OC, Leary PR, Litvin SY, Nickols KJ, et al. Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA. Mol Ecol. 2016; 25: 527-541. doi: 10.1111/mec.13481 PMID: 26586544
44. Pilliod DS, Goldberg CS, Arkle RS, Waits LP. Factors influencing detection of eDNA from a streamdwelling amphibian. Mol Ecol Res. 2014; 14: 109-116. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12159
45. Spear SF, Groves JD, Williams LA, Waits LP. Using environmental DNA methods to improve detectability in a hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) monitoring program. Biol Conserv. 2015; 183: 38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.016
46. Kelly RP, Port JA, Yamahara KM, Crowder LB. Using environmental DNA to census marine fishes in a large mesocosm. PLOS ONE. 2014; 9: e86175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086175 PMID: 24454960
47. Laramie MB, Pilliod DS, Goldberg CS. Characterizing the distribution of an endangered salmonid using environmental DNA analysis. Biol Conserv. 2015; 183: 29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.025