Feedback in Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training: Technology push or demand pull?

7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 1209-1212

  Neri, Ambra ^a   Cucchiarini, Catia ^a   Strik, Helmer ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER ASSISTED; NOCV2; PRONUNCIATION TRAININGS; TECHNOLOGY PUSHES;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 85009274968     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Murray, L., Barnes, A., Beyond the 'wow' factor - evaluating multimedia language learning software from a pedagogical point of view, System 26, 249-259, 1998.
2. Pennington, M. C., Computer-aided pronunciation pedagogy: Promise, limitations, directions, Computer Assisted Language Learning 12, 427-440, 1999.
3. Price, P., How can speech technology replicate and complement skills of good language teachers in ways that help people to learn language? Proceedings of StiLL 98, Marholmen, Sweden, 81-86, 1998.
4. Pujolà, J.-T., Did CALL feedback feed back? Researching learners' use of feedback, ReCALL 13, 79-98, 2001.
5. Krashen, S. D. Second language Acquisition and Second Language Learning, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981.
6. Schmidt, R., The role of consciousness in second language learning, Applied Linguistics 11, 129-158, 1990.
7. Flege, J. E., Second-language speech learning: Findings and problems, in Strange, W. (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, Timonium, MD: York Press, 233-273, 1995.
8. Ehsani, F., Knodt, E., Speech technology in computeraided learning: Strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm, Language Learning and Technology 2, 45-60, 1998, http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article3/index.html.
9. Lyster, R., Negotiation of Form, Recasts, and Explicit Correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms, Language Learning 48, 183-218, 1998.
10. Nagata, N., Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction, The Modern Language Journal 77, 330-339, 1993.
11. Lyster, R. Ranta, L., Corrective feedback and learner uptake, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, 37-66, 1997.
12. Crompton, P., Rodrigues, S., The role and nature of feedback on students learning grammar: A small scale study on the use of feedback in CALL in language learning, Proceedings of the CALL workshop, AIED Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 70-82, 2001.
13. Nicholas, H., Ligthbown, P. M., Spada, N., Recasts as feedback to language learners, Language Learning 51, 719-758, 2001.
14. Chun, D. M., Signal analysis software for teaching discourse intonation, Language Learning and Technology 2, 61-77, 1998, http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article4/index.html.
15. Warschauer, M., Healey, D., Computers and language learning: An overview, Language Teaching 31, 57-71, 1998.
16. Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., Koehler, K., The relationship between native speaker judgements of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody and syllable structure, Language Learning 42, 529-555, 1992.
17. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, 1-16, 1997.
18. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Wiebe, G., Evidence in favour of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction, Language Learning 48, 393-410, 1998.
19. Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., Goodwin, J. M., Teaching Pronunciation, Cambridge: CUP, 1996.
20. Molholt, G., Computer-assisted instruction in pronunciation for Chinese speakers of American English, TESOL Quarterly 22, 91-111, 1988.
21. Akahane-Yamada, R., McDermott, E., Computer-based second language production training by using spectrographic representation and HMM-based speech recognition scores, Proceedings of ICSLP, Sydney, Australia, 1998.
22. Nouza, J., Training speech through visual feedback patterns, Proceedings of ICSLP, Sydney, Australia, 1998.
23. Lambacher, S. A CALL tool for improving second language acquisition of English consonants by Japanese learners, Computer Assisted Language Learning 12, 137-156, 1999.
24. Germain-Rutherford, A., Martin, P., Présentation d'un logiciel de visualisation pour l'apprentissage de l'oral en langue seconde, ALSIC 3, 61-76, 2000, http://alsic.ustrasbg.fr/Menus/frameder.htm.
25. Eskenazi, M., Using automatic speech processing for foreign language pronunciation tutoring: Some issues and a prototype, Language Learning and Technology 2, 62-76, 1999, http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num2/article3/index.html.
26. Menzel, W., Herron, D., Bonaventura, P., Morton, R., Automatic detection and correction of non-native English pronunciations, Proceedings of InSTILL 2000, Dundee, Scotland, 49-56, 2000.
27. Kommissarchik, J., Komissarchik, E., Better Accent Tutor-Analysis and visualization of speech prosody, Proceedings of InSTILL 2000, Dundee, Scotland, 86-89, 2000.
28. Pro-nunciation, Products, 2002. http://users.zipworld.com.au/~pronunce/products.htm.
29. Auralog, Innovations for language learning, 2002 http://www.auralog.com/.
30. ISLE Delivarable 1.4, Pronunciation training: Requirements and solutions, 1999, http://natswww.informatik.unihamburg.de/~isle/public/D14/D14.html.
31. Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., Boves, L., Different aspects of pronunciation quality ratings and their relation to scores produced by speech recognition algorithms, Speech Communication 30, 109-119, 2000.
32. Franco, H., Neumeyer, L., Digalakis, V., Ronen, O., Combination of machine scores for automatic grading of pronunciation quality, Speech Communication 30, 121-130, 2000.
33. Precoda, K., Halverson, C. A., Franco, H., Effects of speech recognition-based pronunciation feedback on second-language pronunciation ability, Proceedings of InSTILL 2000, Dundee, Scotland, 102-105, 2000.
34. Holland, V. M., Kaplan, J. D., Sabol, M. A., Preliminary tests of language learning in a speech-interactive graphics microworld, CALICO Journal 16, 339-359, 1999.
35. Wachowicz, K., Scott, B., Software that listens: It's not a question of whether, it's a question of how, CALICO Journal 16, 253-276, 1999.
36. ISLE Deliverable 4.5, Error diagnosis for spoken language, 2001, http://nats-www.informatik.unihamburg.de/~isle/public/D45/D45.html.