Technology and education change: Focus on student learning

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 285-307

  Means, Barbara ^a  

^a SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Implementation; Software; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008852659     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2010.10782552     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adelman, N., Donnelly, M. B., Dove, T., Tiffany-Morales, J., Wayne, A., & Zucker, A. (2002). The integrated studies of educational technology: Professional development and teachers’ use of technology. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
2. Bakia, M., Means, B., Gallagher, L., Chen, E., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of the Enhancing Education through Technology Program: Final report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
3. Barnett, H. (2002). How to guarantee a learning return on your technology investment. Retrieved March 30,2006, from http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showstory.cfm?ArticleID=3678
4. Becker, H. J. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26,291-320.
5. Becker, H. J. (2000). Who’s wired and who’s not: Childrens access to and use of computer technology. The Future of Children, 10(2), 44-75.
6. Brand, G. A. (1997). What research says: Training teachers for using technology. Journal of Staff Development, 19(1). Retrieved on July 18,2006, from http://www.nsdc.org/library/publications/jsd/brandl91.cfm
7. Cavalier, J. C., & Klein, J. D. (1998). Effects of cooperative versus individual learning and orienting activities during computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 5-17.
8. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement. CPRE Research Report No. RR-043. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
9. Cole, K., Simkins, M., & Penuel, W. R. (2002). Learning to teach with technology: Strategies for inservice professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 431-455.
10. Coley, R. J., Cradler, J., & Engel, P. K. (1997). Computers and classrooms: The status of technology in U.S. schools. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved on August 13, 2006, from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/PICCOMPCLSS.pdf
11. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., Means, B., et al., (2007). Effectiveness of educational technology interventions. Report prepared for Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
13. eMINTS Evaluation Team. (2003, January). Analysis of 2002 MAP results for eMINTS students. Retrieved July 29, 2006, from http://emints.org/evaluation/reports/map2002.pdf
14. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
15. Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., & Borman, K. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: Application to the implementation of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77(2), 148-171.
16. Glennan, T. K., & Melmed, A. (1996). Fostering the use of educational technology: Elements of a national strategy. Santa Monica, CA: Critical Technologies Institute, RAND.
17. Hansen, E. E., Llosa, L. L., & Slayton, J. (2004). Evaluation of the Waterford Early Reading Program as a supplementary program in the Los Angeles Unified School District: 2002-03. Planning, Assessment and Research Division Publication No. 177. Los Angeles: Los Angeles Unified School District, Program Evaluation and Research Branch.
18. Jones, B. F., Valdez, G., Nowakowski, J., & Rasmussen, C. (1995). Plugging in: Choosing and using educational technology. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Educational Research Laboratory. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED415837)
19. Mann, D., Shakeshaft, C., Becker, J., & Kottkamp, R. (1998). West Virginia story: Achievement gains from a statewide comprehensive instructional technology program. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Educational Technology.
20. Martin, W., Culp, K., Gersick, A., & Nudell, H. (2003, April). Intel Teach to the Future: Lessons learned from the evaluation of a large-scale technology-integration professional development program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved December 2009 from http://cct.edc.org/report_summary.asp?numPublicationId=167
21. Means, B., Murphy, R., Shear, L., Gorges, T., Hu, P., & Sussex, W. (2006). Implementing reading and mathematics software. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Available at http://ctl.sri.com/projects/displayProject.jsp?Nick=NTA
22. Means, B., & Olson, K. (1995). Technology and education reform: Technical research report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
23. Means, B., & Penuel, W. R. (2005). Research to support scaling up technology-based educational interventions. In C. Dede, J. P. Honan, & L. C. Peters (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 176-197). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Moore, G. (1999). Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream consumers. New York: Harper Business Essentials.
25. Nunnery, J. A., Ross, S. M., & McDonald, A. (2006). A randomized experimental evaluation of the impact of Accelerated Reader/Reading Renaissance implementation on reading achievement in grades 3 to 6. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 11(1), 1-18.
26. O’Dwyer, L. M., Russell, M., & Bebell, D. (2004). Identifying teacher, school, and district characteristics associated with elementary teachers’ use of technology: A multilevel perspective. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(48). Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/vl2n48/
27. O’Dwyer, L. M., Russell, M., & Bebell, D. (2005). Identifying teacher, school, and district characteristics associated with middle and high school teachers’ use of technology: A multilevel perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(4), 369-393.
28. Office of Technology Assessment (OTA), U.S. Congress. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection (OTA-HER-616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29. Powell, J. V., Aeby, V. G., Jr., & Carpenter-Aeby, T. (2003). A comparison of student outcomes with and without teacher facilitated computer-based instruction. Computers & Education, 40,183-191.
30. Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., & Hegedus, S. (2010). From new technological structures to curricular activity systems: Advanced designs for teaching and learning. In M. J. Jacobson & P. Reiman (Eds.), Designs for learning environments for the future: International perspectives from the learning sciences (pp. 233-262). New York: Springer.
31. Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
32. Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., & Henry, J. J. (1998). Network of influences in an implementation of a mathematics curriculum innovation. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3(2), 113-148.
33. Strudler, N., & Hearrington, D. (2008). Quality support for ICT in schools. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education, (pp. 579-596). New York: Springer.
34. Sweet, J. R., Rasher, S. P., Abromitis, B. S., & Johnson, E. M. (2004). Case studies of high- performing, high-technology schools: Final research report on schools with predominantly low-income, African-American, or Latino student populations. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
35. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Does professional development change teaching practice? Results from a three-year study. Washington, D.C.: Author.
36. Van Dusen, L. M., & Worthen, B. R. (1995). Can integrated instructional technology transform the classroom? Educational Leadership, 53(2), 28-33.
37. Yamagata-Lynch, L. (2003). How a technology professional development program fits into a teachers work life. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 591-607.
38. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics (Policy Information Report). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center.
39. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.