Network of influences in an implementation of a mathematics curriculum innovation

International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 113-148

  Sarama, Julie ^a   Clements, Douglas H ^a   Henry, Julie Jacobs ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES;

MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM INNOVATION;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 0032319110     PISSN: 13823892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009768005398     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Becker, H. J. (1991). How computers are used in United States schools: Basic data from the 1989 I.E.A. computers in education survey. Journal of Educational Computing Research 7: 385-406.
2. Borchers, C., Shroyer, M. and Enochs, L. (1992). A staff development model to encourage the use of microcomputers in science teaching in rural schools. School Science and Mathematics 92(7): 384-390.
3. Bresler, L. and Walker, D. (1990). Implementation of computer-based innovation: A case study. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 17(2): 66-72.
4. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
5. Clements, D. H. (1997). From exercises and tasks to problems and projects: Unique contributions of computers to innovative mathematics education. Manuscript submitted for publication.
6. Clements, D. H. and Battista, M. T. (1990). Constructivist learning and teaching. Arithmetic Teacher 38(1): 34-35.
7. Clements, D. H. and Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 420-464). New York: Macmillan.
8. Clements, D. H. and Meredith, J. S. (1993). Research on Logo: Effects and efficacy. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education 4: 263-290.
9. Clements, D. H. and Meredith, J. S. (1994). Turtle Math [Computer program]. Montreal, Quebec: Logo Computer Systems, Inc. (LCSI).
10. Clements, D. H. and Meredith, J. S. (1995a). Geo-Logo Ships & Grids. Dale Seymour Publications.
11. Clements, D. H. and Meredith, J. S. (1995b). Geo-Logo Turtle Paths. Dale Seymour Publications.
12. Clements, D. H., Meredith, J. S. and Battista, M. T. (1992). Design of a Logo environment for elementary geometry. In W. Geeslin and K. Graham (Eds), Proceedings of the Sixteenth PME Conference (Vol. III) (p. 152). Durham, N.H.: Program Committee of the 16th PME Conference.
13. Clements, D. H. and Sarama, J. (1995). Design of a Logo environment for elementary geometry. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 14: 381-398.
14. Cobb, P. (1988). The tension between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist 23(2): 87-103.
15. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatti, B. and Perlwitz, M. (1991). Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22(1): 3-29.
16. Cohen, D. and Ball, D. (1990). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12(3): 331-337.
17. Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Instructional policy into practice: "The power of the bottom over the top". Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12(3): 339-347.
18. De Diana, I. and Collis, B. (1990). The portability of computer-related educational resources: Summary and directions for further research. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 23(2).
19. Ely, D. P. (1990). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 23(2): 298-305.
20. Etchberger, M. and Shaw, K. (1992). Teacher change as a progressional of transitional images: A chronology of a developing constructivist teacher. School Science and Mathematics 92: 411-417.
21. Evans-Andris, M. (1995). Barrier to computer integration: Microinteractions among computer coordinators and classroom teachers in elementary schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 28(1): 29-45.
22. Farley, L. (1992). Making sense of change: Strategies for educational technologists. The Computing Teacher 19(7): 8-10.
23. Ferris, A. and Roberts, N. (1994, Autumn/Winter). Teachers as technology leaders: Five case studies. Educational Technology Review: 11-18.
24. Fullan, M. G. (1982). The Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
25. Hord, S., Rutherford, W., Huling-Austin, L. and Hall, G. (1987). Taking Charge of Change. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
26. Hoyles, C. and Sutherland, R. (1989). Logo Mathematics in the Classroom. London, England: Routledge.
27. Johnson-Gentile, K., Clements, D. H. and Battista, M. T. (1994). The effects of computer and noncomputer environments on students' conceptualizations of geometric motions. Journal of Educational Computing Research 11(2): 121-140.
28. Koehler, M. S. and Grouws, D. A. (1992). Mathematics teaching practices and their effects. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 115-126). New York: Macmillan.
29. Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M. and Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers' professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal 33(4): 757-798.
30. National Center for Education Statistics (1996). Pursuing excellence, NCES 97-198 (Initial Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study) [Online]. Producer Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: www.ed.gov/NCES/timss. [January 19, 1997].
31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Va.
32. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, Va.
33. National Research Council (1989). Everybody Counts: A Report to the Nation on the Future of Mathematics Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
34. Olson, C. Paul (1988). Computing environments in elementary classrooms. Children's Environments Quarterly 5(4): 39-50.
35. Posner, G., Striken, K., Hewson, P. and Gertzog, W. (1982). Accomodation of a scientific concept: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education 66: 211-227.
36. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 26(2): 114-145.
37. Sosniak, L. A. and Stodolsky, S. S. (1993). Teachers and textbooks: Materials use in four fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal 93(3): 249-275.
38. Stigler, J. W., Lee, S.-Y. and Stevenson, H. W. (1990). Mathematical Knowledge of Japanese, Chinese, and American Elementary School Children. Reston, Va.: National Council of Teaching of Mathematics.
39. Sykes, G. (1990). Organizing policy into practice: Reactions to the cases. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12(3): 349-353.
40. Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan.
41. Tyack, D. and Tobin, W. (1992). The "grammar" of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal 31: 453-479.
42. Wright, A. (1987). The process of microtechnological innovation in two primary schools: A case study of teachers' thinking. Educational Review 39: 107-115.