Identifying teacher, school and district characteristics associated with elementary teachers' use of technology: A multilevel perspective

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 12, Issue , 2004, Pages 1-33

  O'Dwyer, Laura M ^a   Russell, Michael ^b,c   Bebell, Damian J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL   (United States)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^c Natl Bd Educ Test and Pub Plcy   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13444310608     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: 10682341     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v12n48.2004     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Becker, H. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
2. Becker, H., & Anderson, R. (2001). School investments in instructional technology. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
3. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
4. Burstein, L. (1980). The analysis of multi-level data in educational research and evaluation. In D.C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol.8, pp. 158-233). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
5. Cronbach, L.J. (1976). Research on classrooms and schools: Formulation of questions, design, and analysis (Occasional paper). Stanford, CA: Stanford Evaluation Consortium, Stanford University.
6. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold & underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Glennan, T. K., & Melmed, A. (1996). Fostering the use of educational technology: Elements of a national strategy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
8. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. London: Edward Arnold.
9. Haney, W. (1980). Units and levels of analysis in large-scale evaluation. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 6, 1-15.
10. Healy, J. (1998). Failure to connect: How computers affect our children's minds-for better or worse. New York: Simon and Schuster.
11. Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12. Mathews, J. (1996, October). Predicting teacher perceived technology use: Needs assessment model for small rural schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Rural Education Association, San Antonio, TX.
13. Mathews, J., & Guarino, A. (2000). Predicting teacher computer use: A path analysis. International Journal of Instructional Media. 27(4).
14. Market Data Retrieval. (2001). Technology in education 2001. Shelton, CT: Author.
15. McNabb, M., Hawkes, M. & Rouk, U. (1999). Critical issues in evaluating the effectiveness of technology. A summary report on the Secretary's Conference on Educational Technology: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Technology. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
16. Oppenheimer, T. (1997, July). The computer delusion. The Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved September 26, 2003, from http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/ 97jul/computer.htm
17. Ravitz, J.; Wong, Y., & Becker, H. (1998). Teaching learning, and computing: A national survey of schools and teachers describing their best practices, teaching philosophies, and uses of technology. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
18. Ravitz, J., Wong, Y., & Becker, H. (1999). Report to Participants. Irvine, CA: Center for Research in Information Technology in Organizations. Retrieved April 7, 2002, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/ special_report/index.htm
19. Ravitz, J., Wong, Y., & Becker, H. (2000). Constructivist-compatible and practices among US teachers. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
20. Robinson, W.S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351-357.
21. Stoll, C. (1999). High-tech heretic. New York: Random House.
22. United States Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Teachers' tools for the 21st century. A report on teachers' use of technology. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 10, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/spider/webspider/2000102.shtml. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED444599).
23. United States Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, & National Telecommunications and Information Administration. A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Washington DC: Author.