Identifying teacher, school, and district characteristics associated with middle and high school teachers' use of technology: A multilevel perspective

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 369-393

  O'Dwyer, Laura M ^a   Russell, Michael ^b   Bebell, Damian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL   (United States)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746360541     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/4BVW-5NDJ-L2G3-EAND     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Beaton, A. E., & O'Dwyer, L. M. (2002). Separating school, classroom and student variances and their relationship to socio-economic status. In D. F. Robitaille & A. E. Beaton (Eds.), Secondary analysis of the TIMSS results: A synthesis of current research (pp. 211-231). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Bebell, D., Russell, M., & O'Dwyer, L. M. (2004). Measuring teachers' technology uses: Why multiple-measures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 45-63.
3. Becker, H. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
4. Becker, H. J., & Anderson, R. (1998). Teaching, learning and computing: A national survey of schools and teachers. Retrieved January 28, 2003, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/html/tlc_home.html.
5. Becker, H., & Anderson, R. (2001). School investments in instructional technology. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
6. Becker, H. J., Ravitz, J. L., & Wong, Y. T. (1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers and software (Report no. 3). Irvine, CA: Teaching, learning and computing. Retrieved January 28, 2003, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/findings/report3/startpage.html.
7. Glennan, T. K., & Melmed, A. (1996). Fostering the use of educational technology: Elements of a national strategy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
8. Lemke, C., & Coughlan, E. (1998). Technology in American schools: Seven dimensions for gauging progress. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology.
9. Mathews, J. (1996, October). Predicting teacher perceived technology use: Needs assessment model for small rural schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Rural Education Association, San Antonio, TX.
10. Mathews, J., & Guarino, A. (2000). Predicting teacher computer use: A path analysis. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(4).
11. Market Data Retrieval. (2001). Technology in education 2001. Shelton, CT: Author.
12. Market Data Retrieval. (2003). Technology in education 2003. Shelton, CT: Author.
13. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., Gregory, K., Hoyle, C., & Shen, C. (2000). TIMSS indicators of effective schools in mathematics and science. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.
14. Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L. & Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the primary school years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.
15. Maine Education Policy Research Institute (MEPRI). (2003). The Maine Learning Technology Initiative: Teacher, student, and school perspectives mid-year evaluation report. Retrieved November 6, 2003 from http://www.usm. maine.edu/cepare/pdf/ts/mlti.pdf
16. O'Dwyer, L. M. (2002). Extending the application of multilevel modeling to data from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. In D. F. Robitaille & A. E. Beaton (Eds.), Secondary analysis of the TIMSS results: A synthesis of current research (pp. 359-373). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. O'Dwyer, L. M., Russell, M., & Bebell, D. J. (2004, September 14). Identifying teacher, school and district characteristics associated with elementary teachers' use of technology: A multilevel perspective. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(48). Retrieved September 14, 2004 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n48/
18. Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection, OTA-EHR-616. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19. Quality Education Data, Inc. (QED). (2003, September 16). QED's technology purchasing forecast 2003-2004 (9th ed.). Retrieved November 11, 2003, from http://www.qeddata.com/technologypurchasingforecast.htm
20. Ravitz, J., Wong, Y., & Becker, H. (1998). Teaching, learning, and computing: A national survey of schools and teachers describing their best practices, teaching philosophies, and uses of technology. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
21. Ravitz, J., Wong, Y., & Becker, H. (1999). Report to participants. Irvine, CA: Center for Research in Information Technology in Organizations. Retrieved April 7, 2002, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/ special_report/index.htm
22. Ravitz, J. L., Becker, H. J., & Wong, Y. T. (2000). Constructivist-compatible beliefs and practices among U.S. teachers (Report no. 4). Irvine, CA: Teaching, learning and computing. Retrieved February 27, 2002, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/findings/report4/startpage.html.
23. Ravitz, J., Wong, Y., & Becker, H. (2000). Constructivist-compatible and practices among US teachers. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
24. Russell, M., O'Dwyer, L. M., Bebell, D., & Miranda, H. (2004). Technical report for the USEIT study. Boston, MA: Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College.
25. Russell, M., Bebell. D., & Higgins, J. (2004). Laptop learning: A comparison of teaching and learning in upper elementary classrooms equipped with shared carts of laptops and permanent 1:1 laptops. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(3)313-330.
26. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Teachers' tools for the 21st century. A report on teachers' use of technology. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 10, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/spider/webspider/2000102.shtml. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED444599).
27. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, & National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2002). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Washington, DC: Author.
28. U.S. Department of Education. (2004) at Shttp://www.ed.gov/about/ overview/budget/budget04/summary/edlite-section1.html