Exploiting the use of technology to teach: The value of distributed cognition

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 389-404

  Schwartz, Neil H ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008852656     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2008.10782513     Document Type: Note

References (51)

1. Angeli, C. (2005). Transforming a teacher education method course through technology: Effects on preservice teachers’ technology competency. Computers & Education, 45(4), 383-398.
2. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: An instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292-302.
3. Azevedo, R. (2005a). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition- Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 367-379.
4. Azevedo, R. (2005b). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist (Special Issue on Computers as Metacognitive Tools for Enhancing Student Learning), 40(4), 199-209.
5. Azevedo, R. (in press). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia. In D. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Current perspectives on cognition, learning, and instruction. Charlottesville, NC: Information Age Publishing.
6. Brownlee, J., Purdie, N., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2001) Changing epistemologi- cal beliefs in pre-service teacher education students. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 247-268.
7. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Clarke, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Hyattsville, MD: American Psychological Association.
9. Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). New York: Cambridge University Press
10. Derry, S. J. (1996). Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate. Educational Psychologist, 31(314), 163-174.
11. Dillenbourg, P. (2006). The solo/duo gap. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 155-159.
12. Doering, A., Huffman, D. & Hughes, J. (2003). Pre-service teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 342-361.
13. Giere, R. N. (2002). Scientific cognition as distributed cognition. In P. Carruthers, S. Stitch, & M. Siegal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 285-299). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University'Press.
14. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002) (Eds.) Personal epistemology: Thepsychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
15. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsch, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM transactions on computer-human interaction, 7(2), 174-196.
16. Howard, B. C., McGee, S., Schwartz, N. H., & Purcell, S. (2000). The experience of constructivism: Transforming teacher epistemology. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 77-93.
17. Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
18. Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speed. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 265-288.
19. Hutchins, E., & Clausen, T. (1998). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Y. Engestrom & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 15-34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Jonassen, D. H., & Carr, C. S. (1999). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools II: No more walls: Theory change, paradigm shifts and their injluence on the use of computers for instructional purposes (pp. 165-196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Karasawidis, I. (2002). Distributed cognition and educational practice, Journal of Interactive learning Research, 13(1/2), 11-29.
22. Keren-Kolb, E., & Fishman, B. (2006). Using drawings and interviews to diagram entering preservice teachers’ preconceived beliefs about technology integration. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on learning sciences, (pp. 328-334). Bloomington, IN: ICLS.
23. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
24. Koschmann, T. (2002). Dewey’s contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2002 (pp. 12-22), Boulder, CO.
25. Koschmann, T., Zemel, A., Conlee-Stevens, M., Young, N., Robbs, J. & Bar- hart, A. (2005). How do people learn? Members’ methods and communicative mediation. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds). Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication: And how they may be overcome (pp. 265-287). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series Vol. 5. New York: Springer.
26. Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 67-94). London: Harvard University Press.
27. McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & the PDP Research Group, (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Minsky, M. (1986). The society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
29. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006).Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
30. Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-342.
31. Munsterberg, H. (1914). Psychology: General and applied. New York: Appleton.
32. Paige, R. (2005). Toward a new golden age in American education: How the Internet, the law and todays students are revolutionizing expectations (National Education Technology Plan 2005). Jessup, MD: US Department of Education.
33. Piaget, J. (1976). The grasp of consciousness: Action and concept in the young child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37-68.
36. Schwartz, N. H., & Ligorio, M. B. (2004). Understanding cognitive transactions in teaching and learning within virtual communities. In C. Vrasidas & G. V. Glass, (Eds.), Current perspectives on applied information technologies: Online professional development for teachers (pp. 301-316). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
37. Schwartz, N. H., Stroud, M., Hong, N. S., Lee, T., Scott, B. & McGee, S. M. (2006). Summoning prior knowledge: The influence of metaphorical priming on learning in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(1), 1-30.
38. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Suthers, D. D. (2005). Technology affordances for intersubjective learning: A thematic agenda for CSCL. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.) Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10years (pp. 662-671). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Tearle, P. (2003). ICT implementation: What makes the difference? British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 567-583.
41. Thelan, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Totter, A., Stuetz, D., & Grote, G. (2006). ICT and schools: Identification of factors influencing the use of new media in vocational training schools. The Electronic Journal of e-learning, 4(1), 95-102.
43. Tsai, C. (2005). Beyond cognitive and metacognitive tools: The use of the Internet as an ‘epistemolcgical’ tool for instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 525-536.
44. von Glaserfeld, E. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In L. Sterfe & J. Gale (Eds.) Constructivism in educaiion. (pp. 3-16). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
45. van Merrienboer, J., & Sweier, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-177.
46. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E, (1993). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99-174). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
48. Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems: Computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
49. Wundt, W. (1921). Elements of folk psychology. London: Allen & Unwin.
50. Yuen, A., & Ma, W. (2002). Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 365-382.
51. Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. A. (2001) Teacher adoption of technology: a perceptual control theory perspective. Journal for Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 5-30.