Psychology, replication & beyond

BMC Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Laws, Keith R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH;

HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH;

EID: 85008507381     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20507283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alsheikh-Ali AA, Qureshi W, Al-Mallah MH, Ioannidis JP. Public availability of published research data in high-impact journals. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24357.
2. Bakan D. On method. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1967.
3. Banerjee P, Chatterjee P, & Sinha J. Is it light or dark? Recalling moral behavior changes perception of brightness. Psychol Sci 2012. 0956797611432497.
4. Bargh JA. Priming effects replicate just fine, thanks. Psychology Today 2012. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-naturalunconscious/ 201205/priming-effects-replicate-just-fine-thanks
5. Bargh JA, Chen M, Burrows L. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71(2):230.
6. Baron RM, Albright L, Malloy TE. Effects of behavioral and social class information on social judgment. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1995;21(4):308-15.
7. Bem D, Tressoldi P, Rabeyron T, Duggan M. Feeling the future: A metaanalysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events. F1000Research. 2015;4:1188.
8. Bem DJ. Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;100:407-25.
9. Bennett CM, Miller MB. How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1191(1):133-55.
10. Brandt MJ, IJzerman H, Blanken I. Does recalling moral behavior change the perception of brightness? A replication and meta-analysis of Banerjee, Chatterjee, and Sinha (2012). Soc Psychol. 2014;45:246-252.
11. Carter TJ, Ferguson MJ, Hassin RR. A single exposure to the American flag shifts support toward Republicanism up to 8 months later. Psychol Sci. 2011;22:1011-8.
12. Caruso EM, Vohs KD, Baxter B, Waytz A. Mere exposure to money increases endorsement of freemarket systems and social inequality. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013;142:301-6.
13. Coppens LC, Verkoeijen PJL, Bouwmeester S & Rikers RMJP (in press, this issue) The testing effect for mediator final test cues and related final 4 test cues in online and 5 laboratory experiments. BMC Psychology.
14. Coyne JC (in press, this issue) Replication initiatives will not salvage the trustworthiness of psychology. BMC Psychology.
15. Darley JM, Gross PH. A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44(1):20.
16. Doyen S, Klein O, Pichon C-L, Cleeremans A. Behavioral priming: It's all in the mind but whose mind? PLoS One. 2012;7:1-7. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0029081.
17. Driscoll R, Davis KE, Lipetz ME. Parental interference and romantic love: the Romeo and Juliet effect. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972;24(1):1.
18. Edwards W. Tactical note on the relation between scientific and statistical hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin. 1965;63:400-402.
19. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629-34.
20. Fanelli D. Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics. 2012;90:891-904.
21. Feinstein AR. Meta-analysis: Statistical alchemy for the 21st century. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:71-9.
22. Fischer P, Krueger JI, Greitemeyer T, Vogrincic C, Kastenmüller A, Frey D, Heene M, Wicher M, & Kainbacher M The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychol Bull. 2011;137:517-37.
23. Francis G. Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology. Psychon Bull Rev 2012;1-17.
24. Giner-Sorolla R. Science or art? How aesthetic standards grease the way through the publication bottleneck but undermine science. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7(6):562-71.
25. Gold C. Dose and effect in CBT for schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2015; 207(3):269. doi:10.1192/bjp.207.3.269.
26. Greenwald AG. There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7:99-108.
27. Hartshorne J, Schachner A. Tracking replicability as a method of postpublication open evaluation. Front Comput Neurosci. 2012;6:1-14.
28. Johnson DJ, Cheung F, Donnellan MB. Does cleanliness influence moral judgments? A directreplication of Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008). Soc Psychol. 2014;45:209-215
29. Jost JT, Glaser J, Kruglanski AW, Sulloway FJ. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(3):339.
30. Jussim L, Crawford JT, Anglin SM, Stevens ST, Duarte JL. Interpretations and methods: Towards a more effectively self-correcting social psychology. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2016. (in press)
31. Kahneman D. Experiences of collaborative research. Am Psychol. 2003;58(9):723.
32. Kahneman D. A new etiquette for replication. Social Psychology. 2014;45(4):310.
33. Klein RA, Ratliff K, Vianello M, Adams Jr AB, Bahník S, Bernstein NB, Cemalcilar Z. Investigating variation in replicability. A "Many Labs" Replication Project. Soc Psychol. 2014;45:142-152.
34. Lakens D, Hilgard J & Staaks J (in press, this issue) On the Reproducibility of Meta-Analyses: Six Practical Recommendations. BMC Psychology.
35. Lau J, Antman EM, Jimenez-Silva J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:248-54.
36. Laws KR. Negativland-A home for all findings in psychology. BMC Psychology. 2013;1(2):1-8. doi:10.1186/2050-7283-1-2.
37. Lykken DT. Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychol Bull. 1968;7:151.
38. Lynott D, Corker KS, Wortman J, Connell L, Donnellan MB, Lucas RE, & O'Brien K. Replication of "Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth" by Williams and Bargh (2008). Soc Psychol. 2014;45: 216-222.
39. Madden CS, Easley RW, Dunn MG. How journal editors view replication research. J Advert. 1995;24:78-87.
40. Makel MC, Plucker JA, Hegarty B. Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7:537-42.
41. Mosteller F. "Comment" on Jessica Utts, "Replication and metaanalysis in parapsychology". Statistical Science. 1991;6(4):395-396.
42. Neuliep JW, Crandall R. Editorial bias against replication research. J Soc Behav Pers. 1990;5:85-90.
43. Neuliep JW, Crandall R. Reviewer bias against replication research. J Soc Behav Pers. 1993;8:21-9.
44. Nosek BA, Lakens D. Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Soc Psychol. 2014;45:137-141.
45. Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015;349(6251):aac4716.
46. Popper KR. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge. 1959.
47. Reif F. The competitive world of the pure scientist. Science. 1961;134:1957-62.
48. Sapolsky A. An effort at studying Rorschach content symbolism: The frog response. J Consult Psychol. 1964;28(5):469.
49. Schnall S, Benton J, Harvey S. With a clean conscience cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychol Sci. 2008;19(12):1219-22.
50. Schweinsberg M, Madan N, Vianello M, Sommer SA, Jordan J, Tierney W, Srinivasan M. The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2016. (in press)
51. Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U. False-positive psychology undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol Sci. 2011;22:1359-66.
52. Simonsohn U, Nelson LD, Simmons JP. P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014;143:534-47.
53. Sinclair HC, Hood K, Wright B. Revisiting the Romeo and Juliet (Driscoll, Davis, & Lipetz, 1972): Reexamining the links between social network opinions and romantic relationship outcomes. Soc Psychol. 2014;45:170-178.
54. Sterling TD, Rosenbaum WL, Weinkam JJ. Publication decisions revisited: The effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to publish and vice versa. Am Stat. 1995;49(1):108-12.
55. Storm L, Tressoldi PE, Di Risio L. Meta-analysis of free-response studies, 1992-2008: Assessing the noise reduction model in parapsychology. Psychol Bull. 2010;136(4):471.
56. Taylor AE & Munafò MR (in press, this issue) Triangulating Meta-Analyses: The example of the serotonin transporter gene, stressful life events and major depression. BMC Psychology.
57. Van Hiel A, Onraet E, De Pauw S. The Relationship between Social-Cultural Attitudes and Behavioral Measures of Cognitive Style: A Meta-Analytic Integration of Studies. J Pers. 2010;78(6):1765-800.
58. Williams LE, Bargh JA. Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science. 2008;322(5901):606-7.