Correction to: Investigating variation in replicability: A 'many labs' replication project (Social Psychology (2014) 45:3 (142-152) DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000178);Investigating variation in replicability: A "many labs" replication project

Social Psychology

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 142-152

  Klein, Richard A ^a   Ratliff, Kate A ^a   Vianello, Michelangelo ^b   Adams Jr , Reginald B ^c   Bahník, Štěpán ^d   Bernstein, Michael J ^e   Bocian, Konrad ^f   Brandt, Mark J ^g   Brooks, Beach ^a   Brumbaugh, Claudia Chloe ^h   Cemalcilar, Zeynep ⁱ   Chandler, Jesse ^j,aj   Cheong, Winnee ^k   Davis, William E ^l   Devos, Thierry ^m   Eisner, Matthew ^j   Frankowska, Natalia ^f   Furrow, David ^o   Galliani, Elisa Maria ^b   Hasselman, Fred ^p   Hicks, Joshua A ^l   Hovermale, James F ^q   Hunt, S Jane ^r   Huntsinger, Jeffrey R ^s   Ijzerman, Hans ^g   John, Melissa Sue ^t   Joy Gaba, Jennifer A ^q   Kappes, Heather Barry ^u   Krueger, Lacy E ^r   Kurtz, Jaime ^v   Levitan, Carmel A ^w   Mallett, Robyn K ^s   Morris, Wendy L ^x   Nelson, Anthony J ^c   Nier, Jason A ^y   Packard, Grant ^z   Pilati, Ronaldo ^aa   Rutchick, Abraham M ^ab   Schmidt, Kathleen ^ac   Skorinko, Jeanine L ^t   Smith, Robert ⁿ   Steiner, Troy G ^c   Storbeck, Justin ^h   Van Swol, Lyn M ^ad   Thompson, Donna ^o   Van 'T Veer, A E ^g   Vaughn, Leigh Ann ^ae   Vranka, Marek ^af   Wichman, Aaron L ^ag   Woodzicka, Julie A ^ah   Nosek, Brian A ^ac,ai   more..

^a University of Florida ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^e PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f SWPS UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES   (Poland)

^g TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^h CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

ⁱ KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^k HELP UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

^l TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^m SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁿ OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^o MOUNT SAINT VINCENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^p RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^q VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^r TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY COMMERCE   (United States)

^s LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^t WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^u LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^v JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^w OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^x MCDANIEL COLLEGE   (United States)

^y The Holleran Center for Community Action and Public Policy   (United States)

^z WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^aa UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

^ab CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ac UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^ad UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^ae ITHACA COLLEGE   (United States)

^af CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^ag WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ah WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ai CENTER FOR OPEN SCIENCE   (United States)

^aj PRIME Research   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Cross cultural; Generalizability; Replication; Reproducibility; Variation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901716350     PISSN: 18649335     EISSN: 21512590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000373     Document Type: Erratum

References (38)

1. Aronson, E. (1992). The return of the repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 303-311.
2. Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1, 319-322.
3. Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R.,... van 't Veer, A. (2013). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217-224.
4. Carter, T. J., Ferguson, M. J., & Hassin, R. R. (2011). A single exposure to the American flag shifts support toward Republicanism up to 8 months later. Psychological Science, 22, 1011-1018.
5. Caruso, E. M., Vohs, K. D., Baxter, B., & Waytz, A. (2013). Mere exposure to money increases endorsement of freemarket systems and social inequality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 301-306.
6. Cesario, J. (2014). Priming, replication, and the hardest science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 40-48.
7. Collins, H. M. (1974). The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Science Studies, 4, 165-185.
8. Crisp, R. J., Miles, E., & Husnu, S. (2014). Support for the replicability of imagined contact effects. Commentaries and rejoinder on Klein et al. (2014). Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/1000202
9. Ferguson, M. J., Carter, T. J., & Hassin, R. R. (2014). Commentary on the attempt to replicate the effect of the American flag on increased republican attitudes. Commentaries and rejoinder on Klein et al. (2014). Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/1000202
10. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93.
11. Greenwald, A. G., Pratkanis, A. R., Leippe, M. R., & Baumgardner, M. H. (1986). Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? Psychological Review, 93, 216-229.
12. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29.
13. Henry, J. D., MacLeod, M. S., Phillips, L. H., & Crawford, J. R. (2004). A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychology and Aging, 19, 27.
14. Husnu, S., & Crisp, R. J. (2010). Elaboration enhances the imagined contact effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 943-950.
15. Hyman, H. H., & Sheatsley, P. B. (1950). The current status of American public opinion. In J. C. Payne (Ed.), The teaching of contemporary affairs: 21st yearbook of the National Council of Social Studies (pp. 11-34). New York, NY: National Council of Social Studies.
16. Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124.
17. Jacowitz, K. E., & Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1161-1166.
18. Kahneman, D. (2014). A new etiquette for replication. Commentaries and rejoinder on Klein et al. (2014). Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/1000202
19. Kay, A. C, & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837.
20. Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B. Jr., Bahnfk, S., Bernstein, M. J.,... Nosek, B. A. (2014). Theory building through replication: Response to commentaries on the "Many Labs" replication project. Commentaries and rejoinder on Klein et al. (2014). Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/1000202
21. Knox, R. E., & Inkster, J. A. (1968). Postdecision dissonance at posttime. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 319.
22. Lorge, I., & Curtiss, C. C. (1936). Prestige, suggestion, and attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 386-402.
23. Monin, B., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The limits of direct replications and the virtues of stimulus sampling. Commentaries and rejoinder on Klein et al. (2014). Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/1000202
24. Moskowitz, G. B. (2004). Social cognition: Understanding self and others. New York: Guilford Press.
25. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, Me = female, therefore math 5 Me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44-59.
26. Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2011). Implicit social cognitions predict sex differences in math engagement and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1125-1156.
27. Open Science Collaboration. (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 657-660.
28. Open Science Collaboration. (2014). The reproducibility project: A model of large-scale collaboration for empirical research on reproducibility. In V. Stodden, F. Leisch, & R. Peng (Eds.), Implementing reproducible computational research (A volume in the R series) (pp. 299-323). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
29. Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872.
30. Oppenheimer, D. M., & Monin, B. (2009). The retrospective gambler's fallacy: Unlikely events, constructing the past, and multiple universes. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 326-334.
31. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411-419.
32. Rugg, D. (1941). Experiments in wording questions: II. Public Opinion Quarterly, 5, 91-92.
33. Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90-100.
34. Schwarz, N., Hippler, H. J., Deutsch, B., & Strack, F. (1985). Response scales: Effects of category range on reported behavior and comparative judgments. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 388-395.
35. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does merely going through the same moves make for a "direct" replication? Concepts, contexts, and operationalizations. Commentaries and rejoinder on Klein et al. (2014). Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/1000202
36. Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199-214.
37. Turner, R. N., Crisp, R. J., & Lambert, E. (2007). Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 427-441.
38. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.