Experiences of Collaborative Research

American Psychologist

Volumn 58, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 723-730

  Kahneman, Daniel ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ART; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; HISTORY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LITERATURE; UNITED STATES;

AUTOBIOGRAPHY; BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; PORTRAITS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0242330677     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.723     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Akerlof, G. A. (2002). Behavioral macroeconomics and macroeconomic behavior. American Economic Review, 92, 411-433.
2. Ariely, D., Kahneman, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2000). Joint comment on "When does duration matter in judgment and decision making?" Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 524-529.
3. Arrow, K. J. (1982). Risk perception in psychology and economics. Economic Inquiry, 20, 1-9.
4. Bateman, I. J., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2003). Is there loss aversion in buying? An adversarial collaboration to discriminate between alternative theories of loss aversion. Manuscript in preparation, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
5. Cohen, L. J. (1981). Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 317-331.
6. Coombs, C. H., Dawes, R. M., & Tversky, A. (1970). Mathematical psychology: An elementary introduction. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.
7. Frängsmyr, T. (Ed.). (in press). Les Prix Nobel 2002 [Nobel Prizes 2002]. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
8. Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond "heuristics and biases." In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2., pp, 83-115). Chichester, England: Wiley.
9. Gigerenzer, G. (1996). On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky. Psychological Review, 103, 592-596.
10. Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Varieties of regret: A debate and partial resolution. Psychological Review, 105, 602-605.
11. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality, American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
13. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 49-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986a). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59, S285-S300.
15. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986b). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review, 76, 728-741.
16. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325-1348.
17. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
18. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
19. Keysar, B., & Barr, D. J. (2002). Self-anchoring in conversation: Why language users do not do what they "should." In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 150-166). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Laibson, D., & Zeckhauser, R. (1998). Amos Tversky and the ascent of behavioral economics. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 16, 7-47.
21. Latham, G. P., Erez, M., & Locke, E. A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 753-772.
22. Lopes, L. A. (1991). The rhetoric of irrationality, Theory and Psychology, 1, 65-82.
23. Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12, 269-275.
24. Press release: The Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2002, (2002, October 9). Retrieved September 10, 2003, from http://www.nobel.se/economics/laureates/2002/press.html
25. Raiffa, H. (1968). Decision analysis: Introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
26. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 397-420). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.
28. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
29. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974, September 27). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
30. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, S251-S278.
31. Williams, A. C. (1966). Attitudes toward speculative risks as an indicator of attitudes toward pure risks. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 33, 577-586.