Semen quality in the 21 st century

Nature Reviews Urology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 120-130

  Virtanen, Helena E ^a   Jørgensen, Niels ^b   Toppari, Jorma ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

^c TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

1,1 DICHLORO 2,2 BIS(4 CHLOROPHENYL)ETHYLENE; 2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZO PARA DIOXIN; 4,4' ISOPROPYLIDENEDIPHENOL; ALCOHOL; DNA; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR; PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID; PHTHALIC ACID; POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL;

ADULT; AGE; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; DENMARK; DNA DAMAGE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ESTONIA; FINLAND; GEOGRAPHY; GERMANY; HUMAN; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; JAPAN; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MALE FERTILITY; MATERNAL SMOKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL STRESS; MOBILE PHONE; NORMAL VALUE; NORWAY; OBESITY; OLIGOSPERMIA; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; REVIEW; SMOKING; SPERM QUALITY; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; SWEDEN; TIME TO PREGNANCY; UNITED STATES; WIRELESS COMMUNICATION; YOUNG ADULT; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MALE INFERTILITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM; TRENDS;

ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, MALE; INTERNATIONALITY; LIFE STYLE; MALE; SEMEN; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM COUNT; SPERM MOTILITY;

EID: 85008400510     PISSN: 17594812     EISSN: 17594820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.261     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Mendiola, J., et al. Sperm counts may have declined in young university students in southern Spain. Andrology 1, 408-413 (2013).
2. Jørgensen, N., et al. Recent adverse trends in semen quality, testis cancer incidence among Finnish men. Int. J. Androl. 34, e37-48 (2011).
3. Lackner, J., et al. Constant decline in sperm concentration in infertile males in an urban population: experience over 18 years. Fertil. Steril. 84, 1657-1661 (2005).
4. Sripada, S., et al. Trends in semen parameters in the northeast of Scotland. J. Androl. 28, 313-319 (2007).
5. Feki, N. C., et al. Semen quality decline among men in infertile relationships: experience over 12 years in the south of Tunisia. J. Androl. 30, 541-547 (2009).
6. Geoffroy-Siraudin, C., et al. Decline of semen quality among 10 932 males consulting for couple infertility over a 20-year period in Marseille, France. Asian J. Androl. 14, 584-590 (2012).
7. Rolland, M., Le Moal, J., Wagner, V., Royère, D., De Mouzon, J. Decline in semen concentration, morphology in a sample of 26, 609 men close to general population between 1989, 2005 in France. Hum. Reprod. 28, 462-470 (2013).
8. Adiga, S. K., Jayaraman, V., Kalthur, G., Upadhya, D., Kumar, P. Declining semen quality among south Indian infertile men: a retrospective study. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 1, 15-18 (2008).
9. Romero-Otero, J., et al. Semen quality assessment in fertile men in Madrid during the last 3 decades. Urology 85, 1333-1338 (2015).
10. Jiang, M., et al. Semen quality evaluation in a cohort of 28213 adult males from Sichuan area of south-west China. Andrologia 46, 842-847 (2014).
11. Haimov-Kochman, R., et al. Is the quality of donated semen deteriorating Findings from a 15 year longitudinal analysis of weekly sperm samples. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 14, 372-377 (2012).
12. Rao, M., et al. Evaluation of semen quality in 1808 university students, from Wuhan, central China. Asian J. Androl. 17, 111-116 (2015).
13. Wang, L., et al. Decline of semen quality among Chinese sperm bank donors within 7 years (2008-2014). Asian J. Androl. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.179533 (2016).
14. Shine, R., Peek, J., Birdsall, M. Declining sperm quality in New Zealand over 20 years. N. Z. Med. J. 121, 50-56 (2008).
15. Splingart, C., et al. Semen variation in a population of fertile donors: evaluation in a French centre over a 34-year period. Int. J. Androl. 35, 467-474 (2012).
16. Centola, G. M., Blanchard, A., Demick, J., Li, S., Eisenberg, M. L. Decline in sperm count, motility in young adult men from 2003 to 2013: observations from a U. S. sperm bank. Andrology 4, 270-276 (2016).
17. Huang, C., et al. Decline in semen quality among 30, 636 young Chinese men from 2001 to 2015. Fertil. Steril. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.035 (2016).
18. Chen, Z., et al. Temporal trends in human semen parameters in New England in the United States, 1989-2000. Arch. Androl. 49, 369-374 (2003).
19. Axelsson, J., Rylander, L., Rignell-Hydbom, A., Giwercman, A. No secular trend over the last decade in sperm counts among Swedish men from the general population. Hum. Reprod. 26, 1012-1016 (2011).
20. Jørgensen, N., et al. Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men. BMJ Open 2, e000990 (2012).
21. Costello, M. F., Sjoblom, P., Haddad, Y., Steigrad, S. J., Bosch, E. G. No decline in semen quality among potential sperm donors in Sydney, Australia, between 1983, 2001. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 19, 284-290 (2002).
22. Mukhopadhyay, D., et al. Semen quality, age-specific changes: a study between two decades on 3, 729 male partners of couples with normal sperm count, attending an andrology laboratory for infertility-related problems in an Indian city. Fertil. Steril. 93, 2247-2254 (2010).
23. Marimuthu, P., Kapilashrami, M. C., Misro, M. M., Singh, G. Evaluation of trend in semen analysis for 11 years in subjects attending a fertility clinic in India. Asian J. Androl. 5, 221-225 (2003).
24. Birdsall, M. A., Peek, J., Valiapan, S. Sperm quality in New Zealand: is the downward trend continuing N. Z. Med. J. 128, 50-56 (2015).
25. Johnson, S. L., Dunleavy, J., Gemmell, N. J., Nakagawa, S. Consistent age-dependent declines in human semen quality: a systematic review, meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 19, 22-33 (2015).
26. Jørgensen, N., et al. Regional differences in semen quality in Europe. Hum. Reprod. 16, 1012-1019 (2001).
27. Jørgensen, N., et al. East-West gradient in semen quality in the Nordic-Baltic area: a study of men from the general population in Denmark, Norway, Estonia, Finland. Hum. Reprod. 17, 2199-2208 (2002).
28. Richthoff, J., Rylander, L., Hagmar, L., Malm, J., Giwercman, A. Higher sperm counts in southern Sweden compared with Denmark. Hum. Reprod. 17, 2468-2473 (2002).
29. Andersen, A. G., et al. High frequency of sub-optimal semen quality in an unselected population of young men. Hum. Reprod. 15, 366-372 (2000).
30. Punab, M., et al. Regional differences in semen qualities in the Baltic region. Int. J. Androl. 25, 243-252 (2002).
31. Tsarev, I., Gagonin, V., Giwercman, A., Erenpreiss, J. Sperm concentration in Latvian military conscripts as compared with other countries in the Nordic-Baltic area. Int. J. Androl. 28, 208-214 (2005).
32. Fernandez, M. F., et al. Semen quality, reproductive hormone levels in men from southern Spain. Int. J. Androl. 35, 1-10 (2012).
33. Iwamoto, T., et al. Semen quality of 1559 young men from four cities in Japan: a cross-sectional population-based study. BMJ Open 3, e002222 (2013).
34. Paasch, U., et al. Semen quality in sub-fertile range for a significant proportion of young men from the general German population: a co-ordinated, controlled study of 791 men from Hamburg, Leipzig. Int. J. Androl. 31, 93-102 (2008).
35. Halling, J., et al. Semen quality, reproductive hormones in Faroese men: a cross-sectional population-based study of 481 men. BMJ Open 3, e001946 (2013).
36. Mendiola, J., et al. Reproductive parameters in young men living in Rochester, New York. Fertil. Steril. 101, 1064-1071 (2014).
37. Hart, R. J., et al. Testicular function in a birth cohort of young men. Hum. Reprod. 30, 2713-2724 (2015).
38. Perheentupa, A., et al. Semen quality improves marginally during young adulthood: a longitudinal follow-up study. Hum. Reprod. 31, 502-510 (2016).
39. Carlsen, E., Swan, S. H., Petersen, J. H., Skakkebaek, N. E. Longitudinal changes in semen parameters in young Danish men from the Copenhagen area. Hum. Reprod. 20, 942-949 (2005).
40. Swan, S. H., et al. Geographic differences in semen quality of fertile U. S. males. Environ. Health Perspect. 111, 414-420 (2003).
41. Redmon, J. B., et al. Semen parameters in fertile US men: the Study for Future Families. Andrology 1, 806-814 (2013).
42. Swan, S. H., et al. Semen quality in relation to biomarkers of pesticide exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. 111, 1478-1484 (2003).
43. Iwamoto, T., et al. Semen quality of 324 fertile Japanese men. Hum. Reprod. 21, 760-765 (2006).
44. Iwamoto, T., et al. Semen quality of fertile Japanese men: a cross-sectional population-based study of 792 men. BMJ Open 3, e002223 (2013).
45. Stewart, T. M., et al. Associations between andrological measures, hormones, semen quality in fertile Australian men: inverse relationship between obesity, sperm output. Hum. Reprod. 24, 1561-1568 (2009).
46. Haugen, T. B., Egeland, T., Magnus, O. Semen parameters in Norwegian fertile men. J. Androl. 27, 66-71 (2006).
47. Skakkebaek, N. E., Rajpert-De Meyts, E., Main, K. M. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum. Reprod. 16, 972-978 (2001).
48. Skakkebaek, N. E., et al. Male reproductive disorders, fertility trends: influences of environment, genetic susceptibility. Physiol. Rev. 96, 55-97 (2016).
49. Vine, M. F., Margolin, B. H., Morrison, H. I., Hulka, B. S. Cigarette smoking, sperm density: a meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 61, 35-43 (1994).
50. Li, Y., Lin, H., Cao, J. Association between socio-psycho-behavioral factors, male semen quality: systematic review, meta-analyses. Fertil. Steril. 95, 116-123 (2011).
51. Sharma, R., Harlev, A., Agarwal, A., Esteves, S. C. Cigarette smoking, semen quality: a new meta-analysis examining the effect of the 2010 World Health Organization laboratory methods for the examination of human semen. Eur. Urol. 70, 635-645 (2016).
52. Rubes, J., et al. Smoking cigarettes is associated with increased sperm disomy in teenage men. Fertil. Steril. 70, 715-723 (1998).
53. Taha, E. A., Ez-Aldin, A. M., Sayed, S. K., Ghandour, N. M., Mostafa, T. Effect of smoking on sperm vitality, DNA integrity, seminal oxidative stress, zinc in fertile men. Urology 80, 822-825 (2012).
54. Robbins, W. A., et al. Effect of lifestyle exposures on sperm aneuploidy. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 111, 371-377 (2005).
55. Storgaard, L., et al. Does smoking during pregnancy affect sons' sperm counts Epidemiology 14, 278-286 (2003).
56. Jensen, T. K., et al. Association of in utero exposure to maternal smoking with reduced semen quality, testis size in adulthood: a cross-sectional study of 1, 770 young men from the general population in five European countries. Am. J. Epidemiol. 159, 49-58 (2004).
57. Jensen, M. S., Mabeck, L. M., Toft, G., Thulstrup, A. M., Bonde, J. P. Lower sperm counts following prenatal tobacco exposure. Hum. Reprod. 20, 2559-2566 (2005).
58. Ramlau-Hansen, C. H., et al. Is prenatal exposure to tobacco smoking a cause of poor semen quality A follow-up study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 165, 1372-1379 (2007).
59. Ravnborg, T. L., et al. Prenatal, adult exposures to smoking are associated with adverse effects on reproductive hormones, semen quality, final height, body mass index. Hum. Reprod. 26, 1000-1011 (2011).
60. Virtanen, H. E., Sadov, S., Toppari, J. Prenatal exposure to smoking, male reproductive health. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 19, 228-232 (2012).
61. Gundersen, T. D., et al. Association between use of marijuana, male reproductive hormones, semen quality: a study among 1, 215 healthy young men. Am. J. Epidemiol. 182, 473-481 (2015).
62. Dai, J. B., Wang, Z. X., Qiao, Z. D. The hazardous effects of tobacco smoking on male fertility. Asian J. Androl. 17, 954-960 (2015).
63. Jensen, T. K., et al. Alcohol, male reproductive health: a cross-sectional study of 8344 healthy men from Europe, the USA. Hum. Reprod. 29, 1801-1809 (2014).
64. Jensen, T. K., et al. Habitual alcohol consumption associated with reduced semen quality, changes in reproductive hormones; a cross-sectional study among 1221 young Danish men. BMJ Open 4, e005462 (2014).
65. Pajarinen, J., et al. Moderate alcohol consumption, disorders of human spermatogenesis. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 20, 332-337 (1996).
66. Ramlau-Hansen, C. H., et al. Maternal alcohol consumption during pregnancy, semen quality in the male offspring: two decades of follow-up. Hum. Reprod. 25, 2340-2345 (2010).
67. Anifandis, G., et al. The impact of cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption on sperm parameters, sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) measured by Halosperm(® ). Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 290, 777-782 (2014).
68. Martini, A. C., et al. Effects of alcohol, cigarette consumption on human seminal quality. Fertil. Steril. 82, 374-377 (2004).
69. WHO. Obesity. Situation, trends. Global Health Observatory (GHO) data [online], http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk-factors/obesity-text/en/(2016).
70. Sermondade, N., et al. BMI in relation to sperm count: an updated systematic review, collaborative meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 19, 221-231 (2013).
71. Macdonald, A. A., Stewart, A. W., Farquhar, C. M. Body mass index in relation to semen quality, reproductive hormones in New Zealand men: a cross-sectional study in fertility clinics. Hum. Reprod. 28, 3178-3187 (2013).
72. Eisenberg, M. L., et al. The relationship between male BMI, waist circumference on semen quality: data from the LIFE study. Hum. Reprod. 29, 193-200 (2014).
73. Tsao, C. W., et al. Exploration of the association between obesity, semen quality in a 7630 male population. PLoS ONE 10, e0119458 (2015).
74. Andersen, J. M., et al. Body mass index is associated with impaired semen characteristics, reduced levels of anti-Müllerian hormone across a wide weight range. PLoS ONE 10, e0130210 (2015).
75. Belloc, S., et al. High body mass index has a deleterious effect on semen parameters except morphology: results from a large cohort study. Fertil. Steril. 102, 1268-1273 (2014).
76. Ehala-Aleksejev, K., Punab, M. The different surrogate measures of adiposity in relation to semen quality, serum reproductive hormone levels among Estonian fertile men. Andrology 3, 225-234 (2015).
77. Lu, J. C., et al. Body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio cannot predict male semen quality: a report of 1231 subfertile Chinese men. Andrologia 47, 1047-1054 (2015).
78. Nordkap, L., et al. Psychological stress, testicular function: a cross-sectional study of 1, 215 Danish men. Fertil. Steril. 105, 174-187.e2 (2016).
79. Janevic, T., et al. Effects of work, life stress on semen quality. Fertil. Steril. 102, 530-538 (2014).
80. Li, Y., et al. Socio-psycho-behavioural factors associated with male semen quality in China: results from 1346 healthy men in Chongqing. J. Fam. Plann. Reprod. Health Care 39, 102-110 (2013).
81. Mojtabai, R., Jorm, A. F. Trends in psychological distress, depressive episodes, mental health treatment-seeking in the United States: 2001-2012. J. Affect. Disord. 174, 556-561 (2015).
82. Bergman, Å., Heindel, J., Jobling, S., Kidd, K., Zoeller, R. State of the science of endocrine disrupting chemicals 2012. (United Nations Environment Programme, the World Health Organization, 2013).
83. Gore, A. C., et al. EDC-2: the Endocrine Society's second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocr. Rev. 36, E1-E150 (2015).
84. Vested, A., Giwercman, A., Bonde, J. P., Toft, G. Persistent organic pollutants, male reproductive health. Asian J. Androl. 16, 71-80 (2014).
85. Guo, Y. L., Hsu, P. C., Hsu, C. C., Lambert, G. H. Semen quality after prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls, dibenzofurans. Lancet 356, 1240-1241 (2000).
86. Mocarelli, P., et al. Perinatal exposure to low doses of dioxin can permanently impair human semen quality. Environ. Health Perspect. 119, 713-718 (2011).
87. Mocarelli, P., et al. Dioxin exposure, from infancy through puberty, produces endocrine disruption, affects human semen quality. Environ. Health Perspect. 116, 70-77 (2008).
88. Vested, A., et al. Associations of in utero exposure to perfluorinated alkyl acids with human semen quality, reproductive hormones in adult men. Environ. Health Perspect. 121, 453-458 (2013).
89. Vested, A., et al. In utero exposure to persistent organochlorine pollutants, reproductive health in the human male. Reproduction 148, 635-646 (2014).
90. Buck Louis, G. M., et al. Persistent environmental pollutants, couple fecundity: the LIFE study. Environ. Health Perspect. 121, 231-236 (2013).
91. Axelsson, J., et al. Prenatal phthalate exposure, reproductive function in young men. Environ. Res. 138, 264-270 (2015).
92. Cai, H., et al. Human urinary/seminal phthalates or their metabolite levels, semen quality: a meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 142, 486-494 (2015).
93. Phthalate exposure, reproductive parameters in young men from the general Swedish population. Environ. Int. 85, 54-60 (2015).
94. Thurston, S. W., et al. Phthalate exposure, semen quality in fertile US men. Andrology 4, 623-628 (2016).
95. Mínguez-Alarcón, L., Hauser, R., Gaskins, A. J. Effects of bisphenol A on male, couple reproductive health: a review. Fertil. Steril. 106, 864-870 (2016).
96. Christiansen, S., et al. Synergistic disruption of external male sex organ development by a mixture of four antiandrogens. Environ. Health Perspect. 117, 1839-1846 (2009).
97. Rider, C. V., Furr, J. R., Wilson, V. S., Gray, L. E. J. Cumulative effects of in utero administration of mixtures of reproductive toxicants that disrupt common target tissues via diverse mechanisms of toxicity. Int. J. Androl. 33, 443-462 (2010).
98. Dama, M. S., Bhat, M. N. Mobile phones affect multiple sperm quality traits: a meta-analysis. F1000Res 2, 40 (2013).
99. Adams, J. A., Galloway, T. S., Mondal, D., Esteves, S. C., Mathews, F. Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: a systematic review, meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 70, 106-112 (2014).
100. Liu, K., et al. Association between mobile phone use, semen quality: a systemic review, meta-analysis. Andrology 2, 491-501 (2014).
101. NTP. Cell phones. National Toxicology Program [online], https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/(2016).
102. Avendanõ, C., Mata, A., Sanchez Sarmiento, C. A., Doncel, G. F. Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility, increases sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil. Steril. 97, 39-45.e32 (2012).
103. Guzick, D. S., et al. Sperm morphology, motility, , concentration in fertile, infertile men. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 1388-1393 (2001).
104. Bonde, J. P., et al. Relation between semen quality, fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners. Lancet 352, 1172-1177 (1998).
105. Menkveld, R., Stander, F. S., Kotze, T. J., Kruger, T. F., van Zyl, J. A. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum. Reprod. 5, 586-592 (1990).
106. Slama, R., et al. Time to pregnancy, semen parameters: a cross-sectional study among fertile couples from four European cities. Hum. Reprod. 17, 503-515 (2002).
107. Zinaman, M. J., Brown, C. C., Selevan, S. G., Clegg, E. D. Semen quality, human fertility: a prospective study with healthy couples. J. Androl. 21, 145-153 (2000).
108. Buck Louis, G. M., et al. Semen quality, time to pregnancy: the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility, the Environment Study. Fertil. Steril. 101, 453-462 (2014).
109. Patel, C. J., Sundaram, R., Buck Louis, G. M. A data-driven search for semen-related phenotypes in conception delay. Andrology http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/andr.12288 (2016).
110. Zhao, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., Li, Y. Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy, miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review, meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 102, 998-1005.e1008 (2014).
111. Evenson, D. P., et al. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic, prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum. Reprod. 14, 1039-1049 (1999).
112. Spanò, M., et al. Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. Fertil. Steril. 73, 43-50 (2000).
113. WHO. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen, sperm-cervical mucus interaction. (Press Concern, 1980).
114. WHO. WHO laboratory manual for the examination, processing of human semen. 5th edn, (WHO press, 2010).
115. MacLeod, J., Heim, L. M. Characteristics, variations in semen specimens in 100 normal young men. J. Urol. 54, 474-482 (1945).