Flowering time adaption in Swedish landrace pea (Pisum sativum L.)

BMC Genetics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Vanhala, Tytti ^a   Normann, Kjersti R ^b   Lundström, Maria ^a   Weller, James L ^c   Leino, Matti W ^a,d   Hagenblad, Jenny ^a,b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^d Swedish Museum of Cultural History   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Crop evolution; HIGH RESPONSE TO PHOTOPERIOD (HR); LATE FLOWERING (LF); Legumes; Local adaptation; STERILE NODES (SN)

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; CULTIVAR; FLOWER DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC BACKGROUND; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GROWING SEASON; HAPLOTYPE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANDRACE; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MODEL; NONHUMAN; PEA; PHOTOPERIODICITY; ADAPTATION; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SWEDEN;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENETIC VARIATION; PEAS; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SWEDEN;

EID: 85008319085     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12863-016-0424-z     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Mendel G. Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden. Verhandlungen Naturforschenden Vereines in Brunn. 1866;4(3):44.
2. Jing R, Vershinin A, Grzebyta J, Shaw P, Smykal P, Marshall D, Ambrose MJ, Ellis TH, Flavell AJ. The genetic diversity and evolution of field pea (Pisum) studied by high throughput retrotransposon based insertion polymorphism (RBIP) marker analysis. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:44.
3. Colledge S, Conolly J, Shennan S. The evolution of Neolithic farming from SW Asian origins to NW European limits. Eur J Archaeol. 2005;8:137-56.
4. Kreuz A, Marinova E, Schafer E, Wiethold J. A comparison of early Neolithic crop and weed assemblages from the Linearbandkeramik and the Bulgarian Neolithic cultures: differences and similarities. Vegetation Hist Archaeobotany. 2005;14:237-58.
5. Purugganan MD, Fuller DQ. The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature. 2009;457:843-8.
6. Hjelmqvist H. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der prahistorischen Nutzpflanzen in Schweden, Contributions to the knowledge of the prehistoric economic plants of Sweden. Sweden: Op Bot; 1979.
7. Hellström P. Växtodlingen i allmänhet. In: Norrlands Jordbruk. Uppsala & Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksells boktryckeri AB; 1917. p 337-426
8. Leino MW, Nygårds L. Puggor och pelusker -svenska lokalsorter av ärt. Sven Bot Tidskr. 2008;102:153-62.
9. Osvald H. Åkerns nyttoväxter. Stockholm: Sv. litteratur; 1959.
10. Bingefors S, Johansson N, Rydberg I. Improved field pea cultivars for modern farming In: Olsson G, editor. Svalöf 1886-1986. Research and Results in Plant Breeding. Stockholm: LTs förlag. 1986;185-195.
11. Leino MW, Bostrom E, Hagenblad J. Twentieth-century changes in the genetic composition of Swedish field pea metapopulations. Heredity (Edinb). 2013;110:338-46.
12. Hagenblad J, Zie J, Leino MW. Exploring the population genetics of genebank and historical landrace varieties. Genet Res Crop Evol. 2012;59:1185-99.
13. Khan MR, Ai XY, Zhang JZ. Genetic regulation of flowering time in annual and perennial plants. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2014;5:347-59.
14. Weller JL, Hecht V, Liew LC, Sussmilch FC, Wenden B, Knowles CL, Vander Schoor JK. Update on the genetic control of flowering in garden pea. J Exp Bot. 2009;60:2493-9.
15. Weller JL, Liew LC, Hecht VF, Rajandran V, Laurie RE, Ridge S, Wenden B, Vander Schoor JK, Jaminon O, Blassiau C, et al. A conserved molecular basis for photoperiod adaptation in two temperate legumes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:21158-63.
16. Foucher F, Morin J, Courtiade J, Cadioux S, Ellis N, Banfield MJ, Rameau C. DETERMINATE and LATE FLOWERING are two TERMINAL FLOWER1/ CENTRORADIALIS homologs that control two distinct phases of flowering initiation and development in pea. Plant Cell. 2003;15:2742-54.
17. Liew LC, Hecht V, Sussmilch FC, Weller JL. The Pea Photoperiod Response Gene STERILE NODES Is an Ortholog of LUX ARRHYTHMO. Plant Physiol. 2014;165:648-57.
18. Helfer A, Nusinow DA, Chow BY, Gehrke AR, Bulyk ML, Kay SA. LUX ARRHYTHMO encodes a nighttime repressor of circadian gene expression in the Arabidopsis core clock. Curr Biol. 2011;21:126-33.
19. Chow BY, Helfer A, Nusinow DA, Kay SA. ELF3 recruitment to the PRR9 promoter requires other Evening Complex members in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7:170-3.
20. Murfet IC. Flowering in Pisum: a three-gene system. Heredity. 1971;27:93-110.
21. Jones H, Leigh FJ, Mackay I, Bower MA, Smith LM, Charles MP, Jones G, Jones MK, Brown TA, Powell W. Population-based resequencing reveals that the flowering time adaptation of cultivated barley originated east of the Fertile Crescent. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:2211-9.
22. Aslan S, Forsberg NEG, Hagenblad J, Leino MW. Molecular Genotyping of Historical Barley Landraces Reveals Novel Candidate Regions for Local Adaption. Crop Sci. 2015;55:2766.
23. Murfet IC. Flowering in Pisum: Multiple Alleles at the lf Locus. Heredity. 1975; 35:85-98.
24. Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014.
25. Revelle W. psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University: Evanston R package 2014. version. 1.
26. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. In: Nucleic acids symposium series. 1999;41: 95-98.
27. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1451-2.
28. Ruijter JM, Ramakers C, Hoogaars WM, Karlen Y, Bakker O, van den Hoff MJ, Moorman AF. Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:e45.
29. Murfet IC. Pisum sativum L. In: Halevy AH, editor. CRC Handbook of flowering. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1985. p. 97-126.
30. Burstin J, Deniot G, Potier J, Weinachter C, Aubert G, Baranger A. Microsatellite polymorphism in Pisum sativum. Plant Breed. 2001;120:311-7.
31. Liew LC, Hecht V, Laurie RE, Knowles CL, Vander Schoor JK, Macknight RC, Weller JL. DIE NEUTRALIS and LATE BLOOMER 1 contribute to regulation of the pea circadian clock. Plant Cell. 2009;21:3198-211.
32. Hecht V, Laurie RE, Vander Schoor JK, Ridge S, Knowles CL, Liew LC, Sussmilch FC, Murfet IC, Macknight RC, Weller JL. The pea GIGAS gene is a FLOWERING LOCUS T homolog necessary for graft-transmissible specification of flowering but not for responsiveness to photoperiod. Plant Cell. 2011;23:147-61.
33. Nasiri J, Haghnazari A, Saba J. Genetic diversity among varieties and wild species accessions of pea (Pisum sativum L.) based on SSR markers. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8:3405-17.
34. Buckler ES, Thornsberry JM, Kresovich S. Molecular diversity, structure and domestication of grasses. Genet Res. 2001;77:213-8.