A conserved molecular basis for photoperiod adaptation in two temperate legumes

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 51, 2012, Pages 21158-21163

  Weller, James L ^a   Liew, Lim Chee ^a,f   Hecht, Valérie F G ^a   Rajandran, Vinodan ^a   Laurie, Rebecca E ^b   Ridge, Stephen ^a   Wenden, Bénédicte ^c,g   Schoor, Jacqueline K Vander ^a   Jaminon, Odile ^d   Blassiau, Christelle ^d   Dalmais, Marion ^e   Rameau, Catherine ^c   Bendahmane, Abdelhafid ^e   Macknight, Richard C ^b   Lejeune Hénaut, Isabelle ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^c INSTITUT JEAN PIERRE BOURGIN   (France)

^d Université de Lille 1 Sciences et Technologies   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ D EVRY VAL D ESSONNE   (France)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^g CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Crop adaptation; Lens culinaris; Pisum sativum

Indexed keywords

EARLY FLOWERING 3 PROTEIN; HIGH REPONSE TO PHOTOPERIOD PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; FLOWERING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GERMPLASM; HAPLOTYPE; LEGUME; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PEA; PHENOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHOTOACCLIMATIZATION; PLANT GROWTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; WILD ANIMAL;

ACCLIMATIZATION; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CIRCADIAN CLOCKS; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; FABACEAE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; LENS PLANT; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PEAS; PHENOTYPE; PHOTOPERIOD; SEASONS;

HORDEUM; LENS CULINARIS; PISUM SATIVUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84871374199     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1207943110     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Zohary D, Hopf M (2000) Domestication of Plants in the Old World (Oxford Univ Press, New York).
2. Vershinin AV, Allnutt TR, Knox MR, Ambrose MJ, Ellis TH (2003) Transposable elements reveal the impact of introgression, rather than transposition, in Pisum diversity, evolution, and domestication. Mol Biol Evol 20(12):2067-2075.
3. Jing R, et al. (2010) The genetic diversity and evolution of field pea (Pisum) studied by high throughput retrotransposon based insertion polymorphism (RBIP) marker analysis. BMC Evol Biol 10:44.
4. Alonso-Blanco C, et al. (2009) What has natural variation taught us about plant development, physiology, and adaptation? Plant Cell 21(7):1877-1896.
5. Abbo S, Shtienberg D, Lichtenzveig J, Lev-Yadun S, Gopher A (2003) The chickpea, summer cropping, and a new model for pulse domestication in the ancient near east. Q Rev Biol 78(4):435-448.
6. Makasheva RK (1984) The Pea (A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam).
7. Lejeune-Hénaut I, et al. (1999) Floral initiation in field-grown forage peas is delayed to a greater extent by short photoperiods, than in other types of European varieties. Euphytica 109:201-211.
8. Zong X, et al. (2009) Analysis of a diverse global Pisum sp. collection and comparison to a Chinese local P. sativum collection with microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 118(2):193-204.
9. Foucher F, et al. (2003) DETERMINATE and LATE FLOWERING are two TERMINAL FLOWER1/CENTRORADIALIS homologs that control two distinct phases of flowering initiation and development in pea. Plant Cell 15(11):2742-2754.
10. Hecht V, et al. (2011) The pea GIGAS gene is a FLOWERING LOCUS T homolog necessary for graft-transmissible specification of flowering but not for responsiveness to photoperiod. Plant Cell 23(1):147-161.
11. Murfet IC (1985) CRC Handbook of Flowering, ed Halevy A (CRC Press, Boca Raton), pp 97-126.
12. Murfet IC (1971) Flowering in Pisum. Three distinct phenotypic classes determined by the interaction of a dominant early and a dominant late gene. Heredity 26(2):243-257.
13. Reid JB (1982) Flowering in peas: Effect of the gene Hr on spectral sensitivity. Crop Sci 22(2):266-268.
14. Liew LC, et al. (2009) DIE NEUTRALIS and LATE BLOOMER 1 contribute to regulation of the pea circadian clock. Plant Cell 21(10):3198-3211.
15. McWatters HG, Bastow RM, Hall A, Millar AJ (2000) The ELF3 zeitnehmer regulates light signalling to the circadian clock. Nature 408(6813):716-720.
16. Hazen SP, et al. (2005) LUX ARRHYTHMO encodes a Myb domain protein essential for circadian rhythms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(29):10387-10392.
17. Allen T, et al. (2006) Arabidopsis FHY3 specifically gates phytochrome signaling to the circadian clock. Plant Cell 18(10):2506-2516.
18. Salathia N, et al. (2006) FLOWERING LOCUS C-dependent and -independent regulation of the circadian clock by the autonomous and vernalization pathways. BMC Plant Biol 6:10.
19. Michaels SD, Bezerra IC, Amasino RM (2004) FRIGIDA-related genes are required for the winter-annual habit in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(9):3281-3285.
20. Hecht V, et al. (2005) Conservation of Arabidopsis flowering genes in model legumes. Plant Physiol 137(4):1420-1434.
21. Bordat A, et al. (2011) Translational genomics in legumes allowed placing in silico 5460 unigenes on the pea functional map and identi fi ed candidate genes in Pisum sativum L. G3 (Bethesda) 1(2):93-103.
22. Murfet IC (1973) Flowering in Pisum. Hr, a gene for high response to photoperiod. Heredity 31(12):157-164.
23. Lejeune-Hénaut I, et al. (2008) The flowering locus Hr colocalizes with a major QTL affecting winter frost tolerance in Pisum sativum L. Theor Appl Genet 116(8):1105-1116.
24. Yu JW, et al. (2008) COP1 and ELF3 control circadian function and photoperiodic flowering by regulating GI stability. Mol Cell 32(5):617-630.
25. Nusinow DA, et al. (2011) The ELF4-ELF3-LUX complex links the circadian clock to diurnal control of hypocotyl growth. Nature 475(7356):398- 402.
26. Deulvot C, et al. (2010) Highly-multiplexed SNP genotyping for genetic mapping and germplasm diversity studies in pea. BMC Genomics 11:468.
27. Triques K, et al. (2008) Mutation detection using ENDO1: Application to disease diagnostics in humans and TILLING and Eco-TILLING in plants. BMC Mol Biol 9:42.
28. Sarker A, Erskine W, Sharma B, Tyagi MC (1999) Inheritance and linkage relationships of days to flower and morphological loci in lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus subsp. culinaris). J Hered 90(2):270-275.
29. Millan T, et al. (2006) Chickpea molecular breeding: New tools and concepts. Euphytica 147(1-2):81-103.
30. Erskine W, et al. (1998) A bottleneck in lentil: Widening its genetic base in south Asia. Euphytica 101(2):207-211.
31. Jiménez-Gómez JM, Wallace AD, Maloof JN (2010) Network analysis identifies ELF3 as a QTL for the shade avoidance response in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet 6(9):6.
32. Colledge S, Conolly J (2006) The Origins and Spread of Domestic Plants in Southwest Asia and Europe (Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA).
33. Purugganan MD, Fuller DQ (2009) The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature 457(7231):843-848.
34. Abbo S, et al. (2011) Experimental growing of wild pea in Israel and its bearing on Near Eastern plant domestication. Ann Bot (Lond) 107(8):1399-1404.
35. Yan L, et al. (2004) The wheat VRN2 gene is a flowering repressor down-regulated by vernalization. Science 303(5664):1640-1644.
36. Beales J, Turner A, Grif fi ths S, Snape JW, Laurie DA (2007) A pseudo-response regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 115(5):721-733.
37. Murakami M, Matsushika A, Ashikari M, Yamashino T, Mizuno T (2005) Circadian-associated rice pseudo response regulators (OsPRRs): Insight into the control of fl owering time. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69(2):410-414.
38. Murphy RL, et al. (2011) Coincident light and clock regulation of pseudoresponse regulator protein 37 (PRR37) controls photoperiodic flowering in sorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(39):16469-16474.
39. Erskine W, Ellis RH, Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH, Hussain A (1990) Characterization of responses to temperature and photoperiod for time to flowering in a world lentil collection. Theor Appl Genet 80:193-199.
40. Zakhrabekova S, et al. (2012) Induced mutations in circadian clock regulator Mat-a facilitated short-season adaptation and range extension in cultivated barley. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(11):4326-4331.
41. Faure S, et al. (2012) Mutation at the circadian clock gene EARLY MATURITY 8 adapts domesticated barley (Hordeum vulgare) to short growing seasons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(21):8328-8333.
42. Saito H, et al. (2012) Ef7 encodes an ELF3-like protein and promotes rice flowering by negatively regulating the floral repressor gene Ghd7 under both short- and long-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 53(4):717-728.