Data-Based Decision-Making: Developing a Method for Capturing Teachers’ Understanding of CBM Graphs

Learning Disabilities Research and Practice

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 8-21

  Espin, Christine A ^a,b   Wayman, Miya Miura ^a,c   Deno, Stanley L ^a   McMaster, Kristen L ^a   de Rooij, Mark ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008239921     PISSN: 09388982     EISSN: 15405826     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ldrp.12123     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Agresti, A. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/0470114754.
2. Ariely, D. (2009). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. London: Harper.
3. Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Berliner, D. C. (1989). Implications of studies of expertise in pedagogy for teacher education and evaluation. In New directions for teacher assessment: Proceedings of the 1988 ETS Invitational Conference (pp. 39–67). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
5. Berliner, D. C. (1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performances. In J. H. Mangieri & C. C. Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students (pp. 161–186). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
6. Berry Kuchle, L., Zumeta Edmonds, R., Danielson, L. C., Peterson, A., & Riley-Tillman, T. C. (2015). The next big idea: A framework for integrated academic and behavioral intensive intervention. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30, 150–158. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12084
7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Changing teaching through formative assessment: Research and practice. In Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 223–240). Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
8. Canham, M., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20, 155–166. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.014
9. Codding, R. S., Skowron, J., & Pace, G. M. (2005). Back to basics: Training teachers to interpret curriculum-based measurement data and create observable and measureable objectives. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 165–176. doi:10.1002/bin.194
10. Curcio, F. R. (1987). Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 382–393. doi:10.2307/749086
11. Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17, 7–28. doi:10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2
12. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
13. Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 184–192. doi:10.1177/00224669030370030801
14. Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
15. DeStefano, L., Shriner, J. G., & Lloyd, C. A. (2001). Teacher decision making in participation of students with disabilities in large-scale assessment. Exceptional Children, 68, 7–22. doi:10.1177/001440290106800101
16. Ericsson, K. A. (2006a). An introduction to The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: Its development, organization, and content. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 3–20). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816796.001
17. Ericsson, K. A. (2006b). Protocol analysis and expert thought: Concurrent verbalization of thinking during experts’ performance on representative tasks. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 223–242). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816796.013
18. Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J. & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.) (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816796
19. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Ericsson, K. A., & Ward, P. (2007). Capturing the naturally occurring superior performance of experts in the laboratory: Toward a science of expert and exceptional performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 346–355. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00533.x
21. Espin, C. A., Chung, S., Foegen, A., & Campbell, H. (in press). Curriculum-based measurement for secondary-school students. In M. Kennedy & P. Pullen (Eds.), RTI handbook. New York: Routledge.
22. Fausset, C. B., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk A. D. (2008). Visual graph display guidelines. Technical Report HFA-TR-0803. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Psychology – Human Factors and Aging Laboratory. Retrieved November 1, 2016 from https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/40573/HFA-TR-0803%20Graph_Guidelines_Final.pdf
23. Feltovich, P. J., Prietula, M. J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 41–68). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816796.004
24. Foegen, A., Espin, C. A., Allinder, R. M., & Markell, M. (2001). Translating research into practice: Preservice teachers’ beliefs about curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 34, 226–236. doi:10.1177/002246690103400405
25. Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 124–158. doi:10.2307/749671
26. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449–460. doi:10.3102/00028312021002449
27. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1989). Enhancing curriculum-based measurement through computer applications: Review of research and practice. School Psychology Review, 18, 317–327.
28. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Computer applications to curriculum-based measurement. Special Services in the Schools, 17, 1–14. doi:10.1300/1008v17n01_01
29. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989). Computers and curriculum-based measurement: Effects of teacher feedback systems. School Psychology Review, 18, 112–125.
30. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Hamlett, C. L. (2003). The potential for diagnostic analysis within curriculum-based measurement. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28, 13–22. doi:10.1177/073724770302800303
31. Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Responsiveness-to-Intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 195–203. doi:10.1177/0022219412442150
32. Garcia-Retamero, R., Okan, Y., & Cokely, E. T. (2012). Using visual aids to improve communication of risks about health: A review. The Scientific World Journal, 2012, 1–10. doi:10.1100/2012/562637
33. Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment & decision making (pp. 62–88). Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470752937.ch4
34. Koehler, D. J., & Harvey, N. (Eds.). (2007). Blackwell handbook of judgment & decision making. Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470752937
35. Kratochwill, T. R., Levin, J. R., Horner, R. H., & Swoboda, C. M. (2014). Visual analysis of single-case intervention research: Conceptual and methodological issues. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case intervention research: Statistical and methodological advances (pp. 91–125). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14376-004
36. Liang, K.-Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13–22. doi:10.2307/2336267
37. Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47, 71–85. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.667064
38. Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2013). A systematic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educational Researcher, 42, 30–37. doi:10.3102/0013189X12459803
39. Perkins, D. N. (2009). Decision making and its development. In E. Callan, T. Grotzer, J. Kagan, R. E. Nisbett, D. N. Perkins, & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Education and a civil society: Teaching evidence-based decision making (pp. 1–28). Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
40. Sabers, D., Cushing, K. S., & Berliner, D. C. (1991). Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensionality, and immediacy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 63–88. doi:10.2307/1162879
41. Schildkamp, K., Ehren, M., & Lai, M. K. (2012). Editorial article for the special issue on data-based decision making around the world: From policy to practice to results. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 123–131. doi:10.1080/09243453.2100.652122
42. Shah, P., & Freedman, E. G. (2011). Bar and line graph comprehension: An interaction of top-down and bottom-up processes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 560–578. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01066.x
43. Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.000245
44. Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795–819. doi:10.1002/pits.20113
45. Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9–17. doi:10.3102/0013189X024006009
46. Swanson, H. L., O'Connor, J. E., & Cooney, J. B. (1990). An information processing analysis of expert and novice teachers’ problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 533–556. doi:10.3102/00028312027003533
47. Tsui, A. B. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139524698
48. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137–146. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00070
49. Wayman, M. M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Tichá, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. Journal of Special Education, 41, 85–120.
50. Wickens, C. S., Lee, J., Liu, Y., & Gordon-Becker, S. (2004). An introduction to human factors engineering (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson /Prentice Hall.
51. Young, V. M., & Kim, D. H. (2010). Using assessments for instructional improvement: A literature review. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 18 (19), 1–37. doi:10.14507/epaa.v18n19.2010
52. Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. (1999). Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory & Cognition, 27, 1073–1079. doi:10.3758/BF03201236