Teacher decision making in participation of students with disabilities in large-scale assessment

Exceptional Children

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 7-22

  Destefano, Lizanne ^a   Shriner, James G ^a   Lloyd, Claire A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040154300     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440290106800101     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Braden, J. P., Elliott, S. N., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1997). The performance of students with and without exceptional educational needs on performance assessment and multiple choice achievement measures, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.*
2. Chard, D. J. (1999). Case in point: Including students with disabilities in large-scale testing. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 12, 39-42.
3. DeStefano, L. (1998, April). Translating classroom accommodations in large-scale assessment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.*
4. Elliott, J., Thurlow, M., & Ysseldyke, J. (1996). Assessment guidelines that maximize the participation of students with disabilities in large-scale assessments: Characteristics and considerations (Synthesis Report 25). National Center on Educational Outcomes. Minneapolis, MN. http://www.coled.umn.edu/ NCEO/OnlinePubs/synthesis25.html. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 404 803)
5. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Eaton, S. B., Hamlett, C., Binkley, E., & Crouch, R. (2000). Using objective data sources to enhance teacher judgments about test accommodations. Exceptional Children, 67, 67-81.
6. Hock, M. (1998, September). Standards, assessments & IEPs: Planning for success in the general curriculum. Paper presented at the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs IDEA Institute Series, New Orleans, LA.*
7. Illinois State Board of Education (1997). Illinos learning standards. Springfield, IL: State Board of Education.
8. McDonnell, L. M., McLaughlin, M. J., & Morison, P. (Eds.). (1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 409 677)
9. O'Shea, L. J., Stoddard, K., & O'Shea, D. J. (2000). IDEA '97 and educator standards: Special educators' perceptions of their skills and those of general educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 23, 125-141.
10. Phillips, S. (1999, June). Needs, wants, access, success: The stone soup of accommodations. Presentation at the 29th annual Council of Chief State School Officers National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment, Snowbird, UT.*
11. Poulson, J., & Fognani-Smaus, K. (1998). Using the IEP as a tool to access curriculum and instruction (Report for Special Services Unit). Aurora, CO: Aurora Public Schools.
12. Rouse, M., Shriner, J., & Danielson, L. (2000). National assessment and special education in the United States and England and Wales. In M. McLaughlin & M. Rouse (Eds.), Special education and school reform in the United States and Britain (pp. 66-97). London: Routledge.*
13. Shriner, J., & Danielson, L. (1998). Six scenarios for participation of students with disabilities in large scale assessment. Unpublished manuscript.
14. Thompson, S., & Thurlow, M. L. (1999). 1999 State special education outcomes: A report on state activities at the end of the century. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.*
15. Thurlow, M. L., Ysseldyke, J. E., Erickson, R., & Elliott, J. (1997). Increasing participation of students with disabilities in state and district assessment. (NCEO Policy Directions 6). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 416 627)
16. Thurlow, M. L., Seyfarth, A. L., Scott, D. L., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1997). State assessment policies on participation and accommodations for students with disabilities: 1997 update, (Synthesis Report 29). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 425 595)
17. Tindal, G., Heath, B., Hollenbeck, K., Almond, P., & Harniss, M. (1998). Accommodating students with disabilities on large-scale tests: An experimental study. Exceptional Children, 64, 439-450.
18. Wise, S. L., Lukin, L. E., & Roos, L. L. (1991). Teacher beliefs about training in testing and measurement. Journal of Special Education, 42(1), 37-42.
19. Yell, M. L., & Shriner, J. G. (1997). The IDEA Amendments of 1997: Implications for special and general education teachers, administrators, and teacher trainers. Focus on Exceptional Children, 30(1), 1-20.
20. Ysseldyke, J. E., Thurlow, M. L., & Shriner, J. G. (1992). Outcomes are for special educators too. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 25, 36-50.