Translating research into practice: Preservice teachers' beliefs about curriculum-based measurement

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 226-236

  Foegen, Anne ^a   Espin, Christine A ^b   Allinder, Rose M ^c   Markell, Marc A ^d  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^d ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035530631     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002246690103400405     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abbott, M., Walton, C., Tapia, Y., & Greenwood, C. R. (1999). Research to practice: A "blueprint" for closing the gap in local schools. Exceptional Children, 65, 339-352.
2. Armore, D., Conroy-Osequerq, P., Cox, J., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools (Report No. R-2007-LAUSD). Santa Monica, CA: RAND. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 130 243)
3. Arokiasamy, C. V., Strohmer, D. C., Guice, S., Angelocci, R., & Hoppe, M. (1994). Effects of politically correct language and counselor skill level on perceptions of counselor credibility. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 37, 304-314.
4. Austin, E. W., & Dong, Q. (1994). Source v. content effects of judgments of news believability. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 973-983.
5. Billups, L. H. (1997). Response to Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 525-527.
6. Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513-521.
7. Chartprasert, D. (1993). How bureaucratic writing style affects source credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 150-159.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Daly, P. M., & Cooper, J. O. (1993). Persuading student teachers and inservice teachers to use Precision Teaching after the course is over. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 316-325.
10. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
11. Deno, S. L. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement and special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 1-17). New York: Guilford Press.
12. Deno, S. L., & Fuchs, L. S. (1987). Developing curriculum-based measurement systems for data-based special education problem solving. Focus on Exceptional Children, 19, 1-16.
13. Deno, S. L., Marston, D., Mirkin, P., Lowry, L., Sindelar, P., & Jenkins, J. (1982). The use of standard tasks to measure achievement in reading, spelling and written expression: A normative and developmental study (Research Report No. 87). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
14. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-47.
15. Elliott, S. N. (1988). Acceptability of behavioral treatments: Review of variables that influence treatment selection. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 68-80.
16. Espin, C. A., & Tindal, G. (1998). Curriculum-based measurement for secondary students. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 214-253). New York: Guilford Press.
17. Forness, S. R., Kavale, K. A., Blum, I. M., & Lloyd, J. W. (1997). Megaanalysis of meta-analyses: What works in special education and related services. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(6), 4-10.
18. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1998). Researchers and teachers working together to adapt instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 126-137.
19. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Marston, D. (1983). Improving the reliability of curriculum-based measures of academic skills for psychoeducational decision making. Diagnostique, 8, 135-149.
20. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1993). Effects of systematic observation and feedback on teachers' implementation of curriculum-based measurement. Teacher Education and Special Education, 16, 178-187.
21. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1994). Strengthening the connection between assessment and instructional planning with expert systems. Exceptional Children, 61, 138-146.
22. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Ferguson, C. (1991). Effects of expert system advice within curriculum-based measurement using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children, 20, 49-66.
23. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1987). Using computers with curriculum-based monitoring: Effects on teacher efficiency and satisfaction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8, 14-27.
24. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., & Bentz, J. (1994). Classwide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge of student diversity. Exceptional Children, 60, 518-537.
25. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617-642.
26. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Monitoring basic skills progress (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
27. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., Fuchs, D., Stecker, P. M., & Ferguson, C. (1988). Conducting curriculum-based measurement with computerized data collection: Effects on efficiency and teacher satisfaction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9, 73-85.
28. Gersten, R., Keating, T., & Irvin, L. K. (1995). The burden of proof: Validity as improvement of instructional practice. Exceptional Children, 61, 510-519.
29. Gersten, R., Morvant, M., & Brengelman, S. U. (1995). Close to the classroom is close to the bone: Coaching as a means to translate research into classroom practice. Exceptional Children, 62, 52-67.
30. Good, R. H., & Jefferson, G. (1998). Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 61-88). New York: Guilford Press.
31. Hasbrouck, J. E., Woldbeck, T., Ihnot, C., & Parker, R. I. (1999). One teacher's use of curriculum-based measurement: A changed opinion. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 118-126.
32. Hilton, C. B., Motes, W. H., & Fielden, J. S. (1993). Educational recruitment ads: Does prose style really count for much? Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 4, 361-377.
33. Hoeken, H. (1997, July). Designing persuasive texts: What constitutes a convincing argument. Paper presented at the eighth annual meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Utrecht, Holland.
34. Jenkins, J. R., & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59, 421-432.
35. Jones, E. D., & Krouse, J. P. (1988). *struction by student teachers in classrooms for pupils with mild learning handicaps. Teacher Education and Special Education. 11, 9-19.
36. Kaminski, R. A., & Good, R.H., III (1998). Assessing early literacy skills in a problem-solving model: Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 113-142). New York: Guilford Press.
37. Langdon, C. A. (1999). The fifth Phi Delta Kappa of teachers' attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 611-618.
38. Lipsey, M. W. (1990). Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research. Newbury Park. CA: Sage.
39. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1998). Constructing more meaningful relationships in the classroom: Mnemonic research into practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 138-145.
40. Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.
41. Miltenberger, R. G. (1990). Assessment of treatment acceptability: A review of the literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 24-38.
42. O'Connor, R. E. (1999). Teachers learning ladders to literacy. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 203-214.
43. Reimers, T., & Wacker, D. (1988). Parents' ratings of the acceptability of behavioral treatment recommendations made in an outpatient clinic: A preliminary analysis of the influence of treatment effectiveness. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 7-15.
44. Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 559-586.
45. Rose, L. D., & Gallup, A. M. (1998). The 30th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 41-56.
46. Schumm, J. S., & Vaughn, S. (1995). Meaningful professional development in accommodating students with learning disabilities: Lessons learned. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 344-353.
47. Speece, D. L., MacDonald, V., Kilsheimer, L., & Krist, J. (1997). Research to practice: Preservice teachers reflect on reciprocal teaching. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 177-187.
48. Stone, C. A. (1998). Moving validated instructional practices into the classroom: Learning from examples about the rough road to success. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 121-125.
49. Swain, K. D., & Allinder, R. M. (1997). An exploration of the use of curriculum-based measurement by elementary special educators. Diagnostique, 23, 87-104.
50. Tindal, G., & Marston, D. (1996). Technical adequacy of alternative reading measures as performance assessments. Exceptionality, 6, 201-230.
51. Vadasy, P. R., Jenkins, J. R., Antil, L. R., Phillips, N. B., & Pool, K. (1997). The research-to-practice ball game: Classwide peer tutoring and teacher interest, implementation, and modifications. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 142-156.
52. Wesson, C. L. (1991). Curriculum-based measurement and two models of follow-up consultation. Exceptional Children, 57, 246-257.
53. Wesson, C. L., King, R., & Deno, S. L. (1984). Direct and frequent measurement: If it's so good for us, why don't we use it? Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 45-48.
54. Wong, B. Y. L. (1997). Clearing hurdles in teacher adoption and sustained use of research-based instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 482-485.
55. Yell, M. L., Deno, S. L., & Marston, D. B. (1992). Barriers to implementing curriculum-based measurement. Diagnostique, 18, 99-114.