Interval lung cancer after a negative CT screening examination: CT findings and outcomes in National Lung Screening Trial participants

European Radiology

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 3249-3256

  Gierada, David S ^a   Pinsky, Paul F ^b   Duan, Fenghai ^c   Garg, Kavita ^d   Hart, Eric M ^e   Kazerooni, Ella A ^f   Nath, Hrudaya ^g   Watts, Jubal R ^g   Aberle, Denise R ^h  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Diagnostic errors; False negative reactions; Lung cancer; Mass screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRONCHUS INJURY; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; LUNG HILUS; LUNG NODULE; LYMPHADENOPATHY; MEDIASTINUM MASS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE PULMONARY NODULES; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; STANDARDS; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

AGED; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE PULMONARY NODULES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 85008227532     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4705-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD et al (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409
2. Humphrey LL, Deffebach M, Pappas M et al (2013) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the US Preventive services task force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 159:411–420
3. Harris RP, Sheridan SL, Lewis CL et al (2014) The harms of screening: a proposed taxonomy and application to lung cancer screening. JAMA Intern Med 174:281–285
4. Yip R, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Smith JP (2014) CT screening for lung cancer: alternative definitions of positive test result based on the national lung screening trial and international early lung cancer action program databases. Radiology 273:591–596
5. Gierada DS, Pinsky P, Nath H, Chiles C, Duan F, Aberle DR (2014) Projected outcomes using different nodule sizes to define a positive CT lung cancer screening examination. J Natl Cancer Inst 106
6. Pinsky PF, Gierada DS, Black W et al (2015) Performance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: a retrospective assessment. Ann Intern Med 162:485–491
7. Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC et al (2011) The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 258:243–253
8. Gurney JW (1996) Missed lung cancer at CT: imaging findings in nine patients. Radiology 199:117–122
9. White CS, Romney BM, Mason AC, Austin JH, Miller BH, Protopapas Z (1996) Primary carcinoma of the lung overlooked at CT: analysis of findings in 14 patients. Radiology 199:109–115
10. Diederich S, Lentschig MG, Overbeck TR, Wormanns D, Heindel W (2001) Detection of pulmonary nodules at spiral CT: comparison of maximum intensity projection sliding slabs and single-image reporting. Eur Radiol 11:1345–1350
11. Gruden JF, Ouanounou S, Tigges S, Norris SD, Klausner TS (2002) Incremental benefit of maximum-intensity-projection images on observer detection of small pulmonary nodules revealed by multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:149–157
12. Peloschek P, Sailer J, Weber M, Herold CJ, Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop C (2007) Pulmonary nodules: sensitivity of maximum intensity projection versus that of volume rendering of 3D multidetector CT data. Radiology 243:561–569
13. Armato SG 3rd, Li F, Giger ML, MacMahon H, Sone S, Doi K (2002) Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology 225:685–692
14. Rubin GD, Lyo JK, Paik DS et al (2005) Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection. Radiology 234:274–283
15. Li F, Sone S, Abe H, MacMahon H, Armato SG 3rd, Doi K (2002) Lung cancers missed at low-dose helical CT screening in a general population: comparison of clinical, histopathologic, and imaging findings. Radiology 225:673–683
16. Horeweg N, Scholten ET, de Jong PA et al (2014) Detection of lung cancer through low-dose CT screening (NELSON): a prespecified analysis of screening test performance and interval cancers. Lancet Oncol 15:1342–1350
17. Scholten ET, Horeweg N, de Koning HJ et al (2015) Computed tomographic characteristics of interval and post screen carcinomas in lung cancer screening. Eur Radiol 25:81–88
18. Gierada DS, Pilgram TK, Ford M et al (2008) Lung cancer: interobserver agreement on interpretation of pulmonary findings at low-dose CT screening. Radiology 246:265–272
19. Singh S, Pinsky P, Fineberg NS et al (2011) Evaluation of reader variability in the interpretation of follow-up CT scans at lung cancer screening. Radiology 259:263–270
20. Pinsky PF, Gierada DS, Nath PH, Kazerooni E, Amorosa J (2013) National lung screening trial: variability in nodule detection rates in chest CT studies. Radiology 268:865–873