Projected outcomes using different nodule sizes to define a positive CT lung cancer screening examination

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Volumn 106, Issue 11, 2014, Pages

  Gierada, David S ^a   Pinsky, Paul ^b   Nath, Hrudaya ^c   Chiles, Caroline ^d   Duan, Fenghai ^e   Aberle, Denise R ^f  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^d WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^e BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SURVIVAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; LUNG CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VOLUME; ADULT; AGED; CANCER STAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LUNG; LUNG NEOPLASMS; LUNG NODULE; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MULTIPLE PULMONARY NODULES; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; STANDARDS;

ADULT; AGED; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE PULMONARY NODULES; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84984985735     PISSN: 00278874     EISSN: 14602105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju284     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC, et al. The national lung screening trial: Overview and study design. Radiology. 2011;258(1):243-253.
2. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395-409.
3. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al. Lung cancer screening with ct: Mayo clinic experience. Radiology. 2003;226(3):756-761.
4. Henschke CI, Yip R, Yankelevitz DF, Smith JP. Definition of a positive test result in computed tomography screening for lung cancer: A cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(4):246-252.
5. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on ct scans: A statement from the fleischner society. Radiology. 2005;237(2):395-400.
6. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Baseline characteristics of participants in the randomized national lung screening trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(23):1771-1779.
7. Marcus PM, Gareen IF, Miller AB, et al. The national lung screening trial's endpoint verification process: Determining the cause of death. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011;32(6):834-840.
8. Aberle DR, DeMello S, Berg CD, et al. Results of the two incidence screenings in the national lung screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(10):920-931.
9. Church TR, Black WC, Aberle DR, et al. Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(21):1980-1991.
10. Sobin LH, Wittekind C. Tnm classification of malignant tumors. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss; 2002.
11. Pinsky PF, Church TR, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS. The national lung screening trial: Results stratified by demographics, smoking history, and lung cancer histology. Cancer. 2013;119(22):3976-3983.
12. Diederich S, Thomas M, Semik M, et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography: Results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(4):691-702.
13. MacRedmond R, Logan PM, Lee M, Kenny D, Foley C, Costello RW. Screening for lung cancer using low dose ct scanning. Thorax. 2004;59(3):237-241.
14. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP, et al. Ct screening for lung cancer: Suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. Radiology. 2004;231(1):164-168.
15. Wilson DO, Weissfeld JL, Fuhrman CR, et al. The pittsburgh lung screening study (pluss): Outcomes within 3 years of a first computed tomography scan. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(9):956-961.
16. Patz EF Jr., Pinsky P, Gatsonis C, et al. Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(2):269-274.
17. Lung cancer screening version 1.2014. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2013.
18. Gierada DS, Pilgram TK, Ford M, et al. Lung cancer: Interobserver agreement on interpretation of pulmonary findings at low-dose ct screening. Radiology. 2008;246(1):265-272.
19. Singh S, Pinsky P, Fineberg NS, et al. Evaluation of reader variability in the interpretation of follow-up ct scans at lung cancer screening. Radiology. 2011;259(1):263-270.
20. McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening ct. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(10):910-919.