Screening for lung cancer: Alternative definitions of positive test result based on the national lung screening trial and international early lung cancer action program databases

Radiology

Volumn 273, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 591-596

  Yip, Rowena ^a   Henschke, Claudia I ^a   Yankelevitz, David F ^a   Smith, James P ^b  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; LUNG CANCER; LUNG NODULE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME; CLINICAL TRIAL; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SMOKING; UNITED STATES;

AGED; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SMOKING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84908582356     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132950     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. Radiology 2004;231(1):164-168.
2. Henschke CI, Yip R, Yankelevitz DF, Smith JP; International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators. Definition of a positive test result in computed tomography screening for lung cancer: A cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2013;158(4):246-252.
3. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365(5):395-409.
4. Carter D, Vazquez M, Flieder DB, et al. Comparison of pathologic findings of baseline and annual repeat cancers diagnosed on CT screening. Lung Cancer 2007;56(2):193-199.
5. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(5):1053-1057.
6. Henschke CI, Shaham D, Yankelevitz DF, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: significance of diagnoses in its baseline cycle. Clin Imaging 2006;30(1):11-15.
7. Vazquez M, Carter D, Brambilla E, et al. Solitary and multiple resected adenocarcinomas after CT screening for lung cancer: histopathologic features and their prognostic implications. Lung Cancer 2009;64(2):148-154.
8. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Yip R, et al. Lung cancers diagnosed at annual CT screening: volume doubling times. Radiology 2012;263(2):578-583.
9. Wood DE, Eapen GA, Ettinger DS, et al. Lung cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2012;10(2):240-265.
10. Wood DE, Kazerooni E, Baum SL, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): lung cancer screening, version 1.2014. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician-gls/pdf/lung-screening.pdf. Published July 15, 2013. Accessed June 4, 2014.