Performance of lung-RADS in the national lung screening trial: A retrospective assessment

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 162, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 485-491

  Pinsky, Paul F ^a   Gierada, David S ^b   Black, William ^c   Munden, Reginald ^d   Nath, Hrudaya ^e   Aberle, Denise ^f   Kazerooni, Ella ^g  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d Los Angeles ^*  (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SPECIFIC SURVIVAL; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOW DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA; LUNG CANCER; LUNG RADS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SQUAMOUS CELL LUNG CARCINOMA; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

AGED; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84926609696     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/M14-2086     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Moyer VA; U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: U. S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:330-8. [PMID: 24378917] doi: 10.7326/M13-2771
2. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, et al; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:395-409. [PMID: 21714641] doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873
3. Gierada DS, Pinsky P, Nath H, Chiles C, Duan F, Aberle DR. Projected outcomes using different nodule sizes to define a positive CT lung cancer screening examination. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106. [PMID: 25326638] doi:10.1093/jnci/dju284
4. Henschke CI, Yip R, Yankelevitz DF, Smith JP; International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators. Definition of a positive test result in computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:246-52. [PMID: 23420233] doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00004
5. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP, et al; Fleischner Society. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society [Editorial]. Radiology. 2005;237:395-400. [PMID: 16244247]
6. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Lung Cancer Screening Version 1.2014. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2013. Accessed at www.nccn.org/professionals/physician-gls/f-guidelines.asp#detection on 26 January 2015.
7. Naidich DP, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Pistolesi M, Goo JM, et al. Recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules detected at CT: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2013;266:304-17. [PMID: 23070270] doi:10.1148/radiol.12120628
8. Church TR, Black WC, Aberle DR, Berg CD, Clingan KL, Duan F, et al; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1980-91. [PMID: 23697514] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1209120
9. Aberle DR, De Mello S, Berg CD, Black WC, Brewer B, Church TR, et al; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:920-31. [PMID: 24004119] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1208962
10. Horeweg N, Van Der Aalst CM, Vliegenthart R, Zhao Y, Xie X, Scholten ET, et al. Volumetric computed tomography screening for lung cancer: three rounds of the NELSON trial. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:1659-67. [PMID: 23845716] doi:10.1183/09031936.00197712
11. American College of Radiology. Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS). Accessed at www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/LungRADS on 11 August 2014.
12. Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC, Church TR, Fagerstrom RM, Galen B, et al; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology. 2011;258:243-53. [PMID: 21045183] doi:10.1148/radiol.10091808
13. Saeki H, Tango T. Non-inferiority test and confidence interval for the difference in correlated proportions in diagnostic procedures based on multiple raters. Stat Med. 2011;30:3313-27. [PMID: 21953516] doi:10.1002/sim.4364
14. Moskowitz CS, Pepe MS. Comparing the predictive values of diagnostic tests: sample size and analysis for paired study designs. Clin Trials. 2006;3:272-9. [PMID: 16895044]