DynaFlexPro for Maple

IEEE Control Systems

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 127-138

  Bhatt, Rajankumar M ^a   Krovi, Venkat N ^b  

^a M S UNIVERSITY OF BARODA   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008066061     PISSN: 1066033X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MCS.2006.252839     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. “DynaFlexPro portal,” May 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.maplesoft.com/dynaflexpro
2. U. Ascher and L. Petzold, Computer Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations and Differential-Algebraic Equations. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1998.
3. J. Garcia-de-Jalon and E. Bayo, Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: The Real-Time Challenge. New York: Springer-Verlag: New York: 1994.
4. E. Haug, Computer Aided Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechanical Systems. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1989.
5. W. Schiehlen, Multibody Systems Handbook. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
6. A.A. Shabana, Computational Dynamics. New York: Wiley, 2001.
7. A. Erdman and J.P. Sadler, Modern Kinematics: Developments in the Last Forty Years. New York: Wiley, 1992.
8. R.B. Gillespie, “A survey of multibody dynamics for virtual environments,” in Proc. Int. Mechanical Engineering Conf. Exhibition, Dallas, TX, 1997.
9. W. Schiehlen, “Multibody system dynamics: Roots and perspectives,” Multibody Syst. Dynam., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 149-188, 1997.
10. “Multibody system dynamics: Research activities,” May 2006 [Online]. Available: http://real.uwaterloo.ca/~mbody/
11. R. Lot and M. Da Lio, “A symbolic approach for automatic generation of the equations of motion of multibody systems,” Multibody Syst. Dynam., vol. 12, no. 142–172, 2004.
12. “MBsymba,” May 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.dim.unipd.it/lot/mbsymba.html.
13. A. Durrbaum, W. Klier, and H. Hahn, “Comparison of automatic and symbolic differentiation in mathematical modeling and computer simulation of rigid body systems,” Multibody Syst. Dynam., vol. 7, no. 331–355, 2002.
14. P. Shi and J. McPhee, “Dynamics of flexible multibody systems using virtual work and linear graph theory,” Multibody Syst. Dynam., vol. 4, no. 331-355, 2000.
15. C. Schmitke and J. McPhee, “Effective use of Subsystem Models in Multibody and Mechatronic System Dynamics,” Int. J. Multiscale Computational Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 139–159, 2003.
16. C. Schmitke, Modelling Multibody, Multi-domain Systems using Subsystems and Linear Graph Theory. Waterloo, ON, Canada: University of Waterloo, 2004.
17. J. McPhee, C. Schmitke, and S. Redmond, “Dynamic Modelling of Mechatronic Multibody Systems with Symbolic Computing and Linear Graph Theory,” Math. Computer Modelling Dynam. Syst., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2004.
18. “MATLAB/Simulink,” May 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/helpdesk.html
19. W.A. Khan, V. Krovi, S.K. Saha, and J. Angeles, “Modular and recursive kinematics and dynamics for parallel manipulators,” Multibody Syst. Dynam., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 419–455, 2005.
20. W.A. Khan, V. Krovi, S.K. Saha, and J. Angeles, “Recursive kinematics and inverse dynamics for a planar 3R parallel manipulator,” ASME J. Dynam. Syst. Meas. Contr., vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 529–536, 2005.
21. T. Geike and J. McPhee, “Inverse dynamics analysis of parallel manipulators with full mobility,” Mechanism Mach. Theory, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 549-562,2003.