Comparison of traditional and problem solving assessment criteria

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 252-264

  Reid, Carol ^a   Udall, Ann ^a   Romanoff, Brenda ^a   Algozzine, Bob ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001911479     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001698629904300404     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alvino, J., McDonnel, R., & Richert, S. (1981). National survey of identification practices in gifted education. Exceptional Children, 48, 124-132.
2. Baldwin, A. Y. (1978). The Baldwin identification matrix. In A. Y. Baldwin (Ed.), Education planning for the gifted: Overcoming cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers (pp. 33-36). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
3. Bardos, A. N., & Prewett, P. N. (1991). Predictive validity of the Matrix Analogies Test - Short Form. Diagnostique, 16, 101-106.
4. Barkan, J. H., & Bernal, E. M. (1991). Gifted education for bilingual and limited English proficient students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 144-147.
5. Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164-171.
6. Carroll, J. B. (1982). The measurement of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 29-120). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cassidy, J., & Hossler, A. (1992, January/February). State and federal definitions of the gifted: An update. Gifted Child Today, 15, 46-53.
8. Clarizo, H. F. (1982). Intellectual assessment of Hispanic children. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 61-71.
9. Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. J. (1995). State identification policies: Gifted students from special populations. Roeper Review, 17, 268-275.
10. Corman, L., & Budoff, M. (1974a). Factor structures of retarded and nonretarded children on Raven's Progressive Matrices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 407-412.
11. Corman, L., & Budoff, M. (1974b). Factor structures of Spanish-speaking and non-Spanish-speaking children on Raven's Progressive Matrices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 977-981.
12. Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1983). A manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Tests. New York: H. K. Lewis.
13. Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
14. Frasier, M. (1989). Identification of gifted Black students: Developing new perspectives. In C. J. Maker & S. W. Schiever (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities (Vol. 2, pp. 213-225). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
15. Frasier, M. (1991). Response to Kitano: The sharing of giftedness between culturally diverse and non-diverse gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 20-30.
16. Gallagher, J. J. (1985). Teaching the gifted child (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
17. Gallagher, J., Weiss, P., Oglesby, K., & Thomas, T. (1983). Report of education of the gifted: Surveys and evidence of program effectiveness. Los Angeles: National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
18. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
19. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
20. Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 200-209.
21. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihaly, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley Interscience.
22. Kitano, M. (1991). A multicultural education perspective on serving the culturally diverse gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 4-19.
23. Kornhaber, M., & Krechevsky, M. (1995). Expanding definitions of learning and teaching: Notes from the MI underground. In P. W. Cookson, Jr., & B. Scheider (Eds.), Transforming schools (pp. 181-208). New York: Garland Publishing.
24. Maker, C. J. (1993). Creativity, intelligence, problem solving: A definition and design for cross-cultural research and measurement related to giftedness. Gifted Education International, 9, 68-77.
25. Maker, C. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes, and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 23-33.
26. Maker, C. J., & Nielson, A. B. (1996). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
27. Maker, C. J., Nielson, A. B., & Rogers, J. A. (1994). Giftedness, diversity, and problem solving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27, 4-18.
28. Marland, S. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented. Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
29. Matthews, D. (1988). Gardner's multiple intelligence theory: An evaluation of relevant research literature and a consideration of its application to gifted education. Roeper Review, 11, 100-104.
30. Mills, C. J., & Tissot, S. L. (1995). Identifying academic potential in students from under-represented populations: Is using the Raven's Progressive Matrices a good idea? Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 209-217.
31. Montgomery, D. (1989). Identification of gifted among American Indian people. In C. J. Maker & S. W. Schiever (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities (Vol. 2, pp. 79-90). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
32. Naglieri, J. A. (1985). Matrix analogies test (Short form). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
33. Nicholson, C. (1989-90). Matrix Analogies Test (MAT). Diagnostique, 15, 115-123.
34. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. Plucker, J. A., Callahan, C. M., & Tomchin, E. M. (1996). Wherefore art thou, multiple intelligences? Alternative assessments for identifying talent in ethnically diverse and low income students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 81-92.
36. Prewett, P. (1995). A comparison of two screening tests (the Matrix Analogies Test - Short Form and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test) with the WISC-III. Psychological Assessment, 7, 69-72.
37. Prewett, P. N., & Farhney, M. R. (1994). The concurrent validity of the Matrix Analogies Test - Short Form with the Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition and the KTEA-BF (Academic Achievement). Psychology in the Schools, 31, 20-25.
38. Renzulli, J. (1979). What makes giftedness? Brief #6. Los Angeles: National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and the Talented.
39. Rhodes, L. (1992). Focusing attention on the individual in identification of gifted Black students. Roeper Review, 14, 108-110.
40. Ross, P. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
41. Salvia, J. A., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1998). Assessment in special and remedial education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
42. Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (1991). Enrichment and acceleration: An overview and new directions. In G. Davis & N. Colangelo (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 99-110). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
43. Sternberg, R. J. (1981). A componential theory of intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 86-93.
44. Sternberg, R. J. (1985a). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Sternberg, R. J. (1985b). Human intelligences: The model is the message. Science, 230, 1111-1118.
46. Torrance, E. P. (1973). Non-test indicators of creative talent among disadvantaged children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 17, 3-9.
47. Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B., & Thurlow, M. L. (1992). Critical issues in special education (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
48. Wiedl, K. H., & Carlson, J. J. (1976). The factorial structure of Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 408-413.
49. Zappia, I. (1989). Identification of gifted Hispanic students: A multidimensional view. In C. J. Maker & S. W. Schiever (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities (Vol. 2, pp. 19-26). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.