Meeting the needs of gifted learners through innovative high school programs

Roeper Review

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 213-219

  Buchanan, Nina ^a   Woerner, Bill ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT HILO   (United States)

^b West Hawai i Explorations Academy Public Charter School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007849940     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190209554182     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson, G. L., & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12-21.
2. Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Buchanan, N. K., Woerner, B., Cascade, C., & Bigam, N. (1998). Developing talent in high school students: An integrative model. Roeper Review, 19, 208-212.
4. Clark, B. (1997). Growing up gifted (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Coutant, M. F. (1983). A constituency for the gifted and talented. In A. H. Roldan (Ed.), Talented and gifted children, youth and adults: Their social perspectives and culture (pp. 142-143). Monroe, NY: Trillium.
6. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Reframing the school reform agenda: Developing capacity for school transformation. In E. Clinchy (Ed.), Transforming public education, a new course for America's future (pp. 38-55). New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Fogerty, R. (1991). Ten ways to integrate curriculum. Educational Leadership, 48(5), 61-65.
8. Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.
9. George Lucas Educational Foundation (1999). Leam and Live. Retrieved from http://glef.org.
10. Gregory, T. B., & Smith, G. R. (1987). High schools as communities: The small school reconsidered. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
11. Hannay, L. M., & Ross, J. A. (1997). Initiating secondary school reform: The dynamic relationship between restructuring, reculturing, and retiming. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 33 (Supplement), 576-603.
12. Hill, M. B. (1983). Enrichment programs for gifted/talented pupils. Ventura, CA: Office of the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools for the National/State Leadership Institute for the Gifted and Talented.
13. Holtzman, L. (1997). Schools for growth: Radical alternatives to current educational models. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Horenstein, M. A. (1993). Twelve schools that succeed. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
15. Legters, N. E. (1999, January). Small learning communities meet school-to-work: Whole-school restructuring for urban comprehensive high schools. Center for Social Organization of Schools. Retrieved from http:llwww, csos.jhu.edulcrespar/ Reports/report31entire.htm.
16. Maslow, A. (1959). Creativity in self-actualizing people. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation. New York: Harper & Row.
17. McQuillan, P. J. (1997). Humanizing the comprehensive high school: A proposal for reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(Supplement), 644-682.
18. Meier, D. (1995). How our schools could be. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(5), 369-373.
19. Noddings, N. (1993). Educating for intelligent belief or unbelief. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (1998, March). Catalog of School Reform Models. Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org/ecslecsweb.nsf/.
21. Oakes, J., & Wells, A. S. (1998). Detracking for high school achievement. Educational Leadership, 55(6), 38-41.
22. Oxley, D. (1994). Organizing schools into small units: Alternatives to homogeneous grouping. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(1), 521-530.
23. Oxley, D. (1997). Theory and practice of school communities. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 33(Supplement), 624-643.
24. Plucker, J.A. (1998). Is gifted education still viable? Education Week, March 11, 1998.
25. Raywid, M. A. (1997). About replacing the comprehensive high school. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 33(Supplement), 541-545.
26. Raywid, M. A. (1998). Small schools: A reform that works. Educational Leadership, 55(4), 34-39. Available: http://www.ascd.org/readingroom/edlead/9712/raywid.html.
27. Renzulli, J. S. (1979). The Enrichment Triad Model: A guide for developing a defensible program for the gifted and talented. In J. C. Gowan, J. Khatena, & E. P. Torrance (Eds.), Educating the ablest: A book of readings on the education of the gifted (pp. 111-127). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
28. Shermis, S.S. (1994). Talent development in social, historical, and philosphical perspectives. In J.B. Hansen & S.M. Hoover (Eds.), Talent developemnt: Theories & practice (pp. 5-22). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt. 1994
29. Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. S. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
30. Shore, B. M., & Tsiamis, A. (1986). Identification by provision: Limited field test of a radical alternative for identifying gifted children. In K. A. Heller (Ed.), Identifying and nurturing the gifted. Toronto: Hans Huber.
31. Sizer, T. (2001). Coalition of Essential Schools. Retrieved from http://www.essentialschools. org/index.html
32. Southwest Regional Education Board. (2001). High Schools That Work. Retrieved from http://www.sreb.org/programs/hstw/hstwindex. asp
33. U.S. Department of Education. (2001). High School Initiatives. New American High Schools. Retrieved from http://www.newamericanschools.org/index.html.
34. Wolf, J. S., & Stephens, T. M. (1985). Social and emotional development of gifted children and youth. In R. H. Swassing (Ed.), Teaching gifted children and adolescents (pp. 60-91). Columbus, OH: Merrill.